Spiritual Orphanhood as a Factor in the Simulation of the Art World in the Russian Literature of 20-30s of the 20th Century: Self-Identification of the “Former” People

Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates


Release:

2017, Vol. 3. №2

Title: 
Spiritual Orphanhood as a Factor in the Simulation of the Art World in the Russian Literature of 20-30s of the 20th Century: Self-Identification of the “Former” People


For citation: Burova S. N. 2017. “Spiritual Orphanhood as a Factor in the Simulation of the Art World in the Russian Literature of 20-30s of the 20th Century: Self-Identification of the ‘Former’ People”. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates, vol. 3, no 2, pp. 82-100. DOI: 10.21684/2411-197X-2017-3-2-82-100

About the author:

Serafima N. Burova, Cand. Sci. (Philol.), Associate Professor, Department of Russian and Foreign Literature, Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities, University of Tyumen; snburova@hotmail.com

Abstract:

Post-revolutionary experiments in the socio-ideological sphere were reflected in the Soviet mainstream and underground literature in the 20-30s in the system of motives, which evidenced the attempts of the contemporaries to relate the events with the same shocks depicted in the mythological consciousness of generation. The objective of such modeling was to find spiritual support in the past, helping to accept the fact of spiritual abandonment as inevitable, and to comprehend that it is not impossible to change or hope for the possibility of spiritual opposition to the processes of individual’s devaluation. In A. Tolstoy’s “Aelita”, E. Zamyatin’s “We”, Yuri Tynianov’s “Death of Wazir-Mukhtar”, Ya. Golosovker’s “Burnt Novel”, S. Krzhizhanovsky’s “The Return of Baron Munchausen”, K. Vaginov’s “Goat Song”, G. Chulkov’s “Pest” and other works, reminiscence-psychological, historical and religious, historical and philosophical analogies prompted the solution to the problem of spiritual self-preservation.

References:

  1. Andreev N. P. 1988. Problema tozhdestva syuzheta. Folklor. Problemy istorizma [The Problem of Plot’s Equivalence. Folklore. The Problems of Historism], pp. 230-243. Moscow.
  2. Vaginov К. K. 1991. “Kozlinaya pesn (1926-1927-1929)” [Goat Song (1926-1927-1929)]. In: Vagonov K. K. Kozlinaya pesn. Romany [Goat Song. Novels], pp. 12-161. Moscow: Sovremennik. 
  3. Vaginov К. K. 1989. “Kozlinaya pesn (1926-1927)” [Goat Song (1926-1927)]. In: Vagonov K. K. Kozlinaya pesn; Trudy i dni Svistonova; Bambochada [Goat Song; Works and Days of Svistonov; Bambochada], pp. 19-206. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura. 
  4. Golosovker Ya. E. 1987. Logika mifa [Myth’s Logic]. Moscow: Nauka.
  5. Golosovker Ya. E. 1991. Sozhennyy roman [Burnt Novel]. http://fanread.ru/book/10795666/?page=1-12
  6. Gudkova V. 2008. Rozhdenie sovetskih syuzhetov: Tipologiya otechestvennoy dramy 1920-kh — nachala 1930-kh godov [Birth of the Soviet Plots. The Typology of the Russian Drama of the 1902 — early 1930s]. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie.
  7. Burova S. N. 2015. Istoriya otechestvennoy literatury XX veka. Russky literaturny andergraund [The history of the Russian Literature in the 20th Century. The Russian Literary Underground]. Tyumen: Tyumen State University Publishing.
  8. Kozyrev М. 1991. Pyatoe puteshestvie Lemyuelya Gullivera [The Fifth Travel of Lemuel Gulliver]. Tekst. http://az.lib.ru/k/kozyrew_m_j/text_0024.shtml
  9. Krzhizhanovsky S. D. 1991. “Vozvraschenie Myunhgauzena” [Return of Munchausen]. In: Krzhizhanovsky S. D. Skazky dlya vunderkindov: Povesti, rasskazy, pp. 581-685. Moscow: Sovetsky pisatel’.
  10. Silantyev I. V. 2009. Syuzhetologicheskie issledovaniya [Plot Research]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury.
  11. Sinyavskiy А. D. 2002. Osnovy sovetskoy tsivilizatsii [Foundatinos of the Soviet Civilization]. Moscow: Agraf.
  12. Smirnov I. P. 2008. Oliteraturennoe vremya [Literated Time]. St. Petersburg: RHGA.
  13. Tolstoy А. N. 1958-1961. Sobranie sochineniy [Selected Woks] in 10 vols. Vol. 3, pp. 533-685, “Aelita” [Aelita]. Vol. 5, pp. 7-307, “Syostry” [Sisters]. Moscow: Khudozhestvennaya literatura.
  14. Tynyanov Yu. N. 1983. Smert’ Vazir-Muhtara [Death of Wazir-Mukhtar]. Moscow: Pravda.
  15. Uspenskiy B. A. 2004. Istoriko-philologicheskie ocherki [Hictorical and Philological Studies]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury.
  16. Uspenskiy B. A. 2005. Semiotika iskustva: Poetika kompozitsii. Semiotika ikony. Stat’i ob iskustve [Semiotics of Art: The Poetics of Composition. Semiotics of Icon. Articles about Art]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kul’tury.
  17. Khalil Kh. I. 2008. “Nitssheanskie motivy v romane A. N. Tolstogo ‘Aelita’” [Nietzschean Motives in A. N. Tolstoy’s “Aelita”]. Vestnik Sankt-Peterburgskogo universiteta, series 9, vol. 4, no 2, pp. 82-84.
  18. Tsivyan T. V. 2001. Semioticheskie puteshestviya [Semiotic Travels]. St. Petersburg: Izdatel’stvo Ivana Limbaha.
  19. Chudakova M. O. 2001. Izbrannye raboty [Selected Works], vol. 1. Literatura sovetskogo proshlogo [Literature of the Soviet Past]. Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kul’tury.
  20. Chulkov G. I. 1998. Vreditel’ [Spoiler]. In: Chulkov G. I. Valtasarovo tsartctvo, pp. 314-340. Moscow: Respublika.
  21. Shmid V. 2003. Narratologiya [Narratology]. Moscow: Yuzyki slavyanskoy kul’tury.