Pure Azure and the Sibyl’s milk: The birth of a poem in the poetic imagination of Stéphane Mallarmé and Innokenty Annensky

Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates


Release:

2026. Vol. 12. № 2 (46)

Title: 
Pure Azure and the Sibyl’s milk: The birth of a poem in the poetic imagination of Stéphane Mallarmé and Innokenty Annensky


For citation: Sokolov, R. E, & Ganin, M. V. (2026). Pure Azure and the Sibyl’s milk: The birth of a poem in the poetic imagination of Stéphane Mallarmé and Innokenty Annensky. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates, 12(2), 55–71. https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-197X-2026-12-2-55-71

About the authors:

Roman E. Sokolov, Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Independent Researcher, Cheboksary, Russia

raymondq@mail.ru, https://orcid.org/0009-0006-5958-3804

Maxim V. Ganin, Cand. Sci. (Philol.), Associate Professor of the Department of National and General History, Chuvash State Pedagogical University named after I. Ya. Yakovlev, Cheboksary, Russia

isaaa@yandex.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9050-6715

Abstract:

This article examines selected aspects of artistic reflection in the works of Innokenty Annensky and Stéphane Mallarmé. It aims to provide a comparative analysis of how each author conceptualizes the emergence of a poetic text. The study focuses on three works: Mallarmé’s “Don du Poème” (The Poem’s Gift), Annensky’s translation of this poem, and the latter’s “Third Tormenting Sonnet”. Drawing on intertextual analysis and a hermeneutic approach to poetic imagery, understood here as the description of specific modes of phenomenologization within the texts, the authors identify fundamental differences in how these writers conceive the genesis of a literary work. This divergence stems from their radically opposed views of both the poetic process and the role of the author within it. For Mallarmé, the meaning of this process lies exclusively in the creation of a perfect artistic form; for Annensky, by contrast, the primary aim is the transmission of a particular experience. The analysis thus highlights two distinct modes of poetic phenomenologization: On the one hand, a mode of deconstructing poetic images grounded in the (self-)disclosure of their dark intertextual depth (Mallarmé); on the other, a mode oriented toward conveying the immediate impression underlying the event of the text, thereby connecting it to the living reality from which it emerges (Annensky).

Keywords:

  • Stéphane Mallarmé
  • Innokenty Annensky
  • poetic text genesis
  • phenomenologization
  • poetic experience
  • intertextuality
  • poetic image

References:

Akimova, A. V. (2001). The Problem of the Author and the “Great Work” in the oeuvre of Stéphane Mallarmé [Cand. Sci. dissertation]. St. Petersburg. [In Russian]

Alyokhina, N. M. (2014). French Symbolism in the Artistic and Critical Reception of I. F. Annensky [Cand. Sci. dissertation abstract]. Tomsk.

Annensky, I. F. (1990). Poems and Tragedies. Sovetsky Pisatel.

Akhmatova, A. A. (2020). Small Collection of Works. Azbuka.

Blanchot, M. (2002). The Space of Literature. ΛΟΓΟΣ.

Dubrovkin, R. M. (2000). Stéphane Mallarmé and Innokenty Annensky: Translation and the Bible. Vsemirnoe Slovo = All-World Word, (13), 101–106.

Kochetkov, P. V. (2023). The poetry of S. Mallarmé in Russian and translation problems. Moscow University Translation Studies Bulletin, (3), 39–51. Retrieved July 16, 2026, from https://vestnik-translation.ru/articles/article/14503/

Krivulin, V. B. (1996). Illness as a factor in Annensky’s poetics. In G. T. Savelyeva (Ed.), Innokenty Annensky and Russian Culture of the 20th Century: Collection of Scientific Papers (pp. 105–109). ARSIS.

Li, P. V. (2024). The sonnet “Don du poème” by S. Mallarmé in Russian translations. Far Eastern Philological Journal, 2(3), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.24866/2949-2580/2024-3/9-21

Mallarmé, S. (1995). Works in Verse and Prose: Collection. Raduga.

Sartre, J.-P. (1998). Situations. Ladomir.

Jakobson, R. O. (1975). Linguistics and poetics. In Structuralism “For” and “Against”: Collection of Articles (pp. 193–230). Progress.

Abastado, Cl. (1970). Expérience et théorie de la création poétique chez Mallarmé. Archives des Lettres Modernes, (119). Minard.

Banville, Th. de. (1873). Oeuvres de Théodore de Banville: Odes funambulesques; suivies d’un commentaire. Librarie Alphonse le Merre.

Gautier, Th. (1970a). Poésies complètes (Vol. 1). Nizet.

Gautier, Th. (1970b). Poésies complètes (Vol. 2). Nizet.

Hambly, P. S. (1990). Lecture intertextuelle de Don du poème. Littératures, (22), 93–103.

Hugo, V. (1964). Oeuvres poétiques (Tome 1). Bibliothèque de la Pléiade.

Mallarmé, S. (2019). Correspondance (1854–1898) (B. Marchal, Éd.; J.-Y. Tadié, Dir.). Gallimard.

Steinmetz, J.-L. (1975). Mallarmé en corps. Littérature, (17), Les jeux de la métaphore, 105–128.