Active derivational processes in the field of univerbation in scientific and media discourse

Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates


Release:

2024. Vol. 10. № 3 (39)

Title: 
Active derivational processes in the field of univerbation in scientific and media discourse


For citation: Batulina, A. V. (2024). Active derivational processes in the field of univerbation in scientific and media discourse. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates, 10(3), 39–52. https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-197X-2024-10-3-39-52

About the author:

Anna V. Batulina, Cand. Sci. (Philol.), Associate Professor, Yaroslav-the-Wise Novgorod State University, Veliky Novgorod, Russia; b.av@bk.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6341-5965

Abstract:

This article presents the results of a multidimensional analysis of productive types of univerbation in scientific and media discourse. Analyzing various perspectives on the univerbation phenomenon, the author explains univerbation as a process of forming a one-word nomination based on a stable phrase or combination with an adjacent analyte adjective, in which an attributive or substantive component bearing the main semantic load becomes the formal representative of the motivating one. Both the motivating phrase as a whole and one of the phrases included in the generating database can have semantic integrity in the univerbation. Based on the quantitative analysis of the use of neological univerbs, the results show that in media speech, in a group of meaningfully equivalent suffixal and coderivate univerbs formed by zero suffixation, there is a gradual withdrawal from the use of derivatives with a materially pronounced suffix. Having analyzed contexts of using univerbs in the media, Internet communication, and academic speech, the authos has described the word-formation structure of neological univerbs, models of motivating phrases, and productive formants. The tendency to increase productivity in the analyzed types of discourse of the univerbs with a zero suffix is revealed.

References:

Batulina, A. V. (2022). New tendencies in the formation of universals (the case of the Russian language). In E. S. Sheremetieva, E. A. Starodumova, & A. A. Anisova (Eds.), Russian Grammar in the Dialog of Scientific Schools, Directions, Methods: A Collection of Research Articles (pp. 7–13). Far Eastern Federal University. [In Russian]

Vinogradov, V. V., et al. (Eds.). (1952). Grammar of the Russian Language (Vol. 1). Publishing House of the USSR Academy of Sciences. [In Russian]

Vinogradov, V. V. (1972). Russian Language (Grammatical Doctrine of the Word). Vysshaya shkola. [In Russian]

Vinogradova, V. N. (2012). The system of Russian Word Formation in the Functional and Stylistic Aspect. Infotekh. [In Russian]

Dozorova, D. V. (2015). Word-formation models of university schools in modern Russian. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod Herald, (2), 392–396. [In Russian]

Zemskaya, E. A. (1981). Russian Colloquial Speech: General Questions. Word Formation. The Syntax. Nauka. [In Russian]

Zemskaya, E. A. (2014). Language as An Activity. FLINTA: Nauka. [In Russian]

Kopot, L. V. (2008). Univerbs in Russian Colloquial Speech: Structure and Semantics: Based on the Material of the Za Rulem Magazine. Adyghe State University. [In Russian]

Krysin, L. P. (2003). Social differentiation of the modern Russian national language system. In Modern Russian language: Social and Functional Differentiation (pp. 33–102). Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury. [In Russian]

Kuznetsov, S. A. (Ed.). (1998). А Large Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language.  Norint.  [In Russian]

Markova, E. M. (2023). Verbal univerbation as one of the modern derivational trends. VERBA. Northwestern Linguistic Journal, (1), 61–71. [In Russian]

Russian National Corpus. (n.d.). Retrieved Jul. 5, 2023, from https://ruscorpora.ru/ [In Russian]

Neshchimenko, G. P. (2010). The tendency of linguistic economy as a factor in the dynamics of literary norms. In New Phenomena in Slavic Word Formation: System and Functioning. Reports of the 11th International Research Conference of the Commission on Slavic Word Formation under the International Committee of Slavists (pp. 116–134). Maks Press. [In Russian]

Novikov, V. I. (2019). Dictionary of Fashionable Words. The Linguistic Picture of Modernity. Slovari XXI veka. [In Russian]

Osipova, L. I. (1994). Active Processes in Modern Russian Word Formation: (Suffixation and Truncation): The Manual for the Special Course. Prometey. [In Russian]

Osipova, L. I. (2000). New Words in the Russian Language: Feminine Suffixal Univerbs with the suffix -k(a). Referential Dictionary on the Materials of the Press and Literature of the 1960s and 1990s. MPGU. [In Russian]

Sklyarevskаyа, G. N. (Ed.). (2008). Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language of the early 21st century. Current Vocabulary. Eksmo. [In Russian]

Tsinsyan, V. (2019). Russian Neologisms-Univerbs: methods of education, semantics, features of functioning. Svet. [In Russian]

Shvedova, N. Yu. (Ed.). (1970). Grammar of the Modern Russian Literary Language (Vol. 1). Nauka. [In Russian]

Shvedova, N. Yu. (Ed.). (1980). Russian Grammar: in 2 vols. (Vol. 1). Nauka. [In Russian]

Shirshov, I. A. (2004). Russian Explnatory Dictionary: appr. 37,000 words of the Russian Language, combined into 2,000 word-formation nests: a comprehensive description of Russian vocabulary and word formation. AST: Astrel: Russkie slovari: Ermak. [In Russian]