Ladder locus in Chekhov’s work of 1890s–1900s: from the spiritual to the obscene

Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates


Release:

2024. Vol. 10. № 2 (38)

Title: 
Ladder locus in Chekhov’s work of 1890s–1900s: from the spiritual to the obscene


For citation: Rasskazova, K. S. (2024). Ladder locus in Chekhov’s work 1890s–1900s: from the spiritual to the obscene. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates, 10(2), 71–84. https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-197X-2024-10-2-71-84

About the author:

Kristina S. Rasskazova, Junior Researcher, Center of Urban Studies, University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia; k.s.rasskazova@utmn.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5240-6078

Abstract:

The research focuses on studying the structure of the ladder locus in Chekhov’s works of the 1890s–1900s, fixing non-classical shifts in the structure of the locus and assessing their amount. Using the historical and literary approach (M. M. Bakhtin, Yu. M. Lotman, and D. S. Likhachev), the author continues the study of the symbolic potential of Chekhov’s creativity, started by A. P. Chudakov, I. N. Sukhoi, and S. A. Komarov. In spatial terms, the article relies on M. O. Goryacheva and N. E. Razumova’s research. Using the continuous sampling method, 56 fragments from 1888 to 1903 were selected, 32 fragments were analyzed. The results show that when creating the author’s myth, Chekhov relies on the folklore, biblical context, imagery of Nietzsche, Merezhkovsky, Griboyedov, Gogol, and Dostoevsky; he creatively rethinks the material of the sources. Three individual author’s motives related to the ladder locus are identified: 1) the motive of the shameful and obscene, 2) falling down the stairs, and 3) the vertical gap. The analysis of the structure of the Chekhov ladder locus confirms the conclusions drawn earlier on the material of other spatial units: the topos of the garden, forest, manor, and the locus of the bench. The non-classical nature of spaces in the late creative period of the writer leads to the need to remove the attitude towards the realism of Chekhov’s texts and indicates the beginning of the modernization process in Russian literature in the last decade of the 19th c.

References:

Anisimov, K. (2011). A. P. Chekhov’s Siberian-Sakhalin travelogue in the history of the artistic “imagination” of the Trans-Urals: between nature and society. In Chekhov and Time (pp. 246–260). Tomsk University Press. [In Russian].

Barthes, R. (2016). How to Live Together. Ad Marginem. [In Russian].

Bakhtin, M. (1975). Questions of Literature and Aesthetics. Research from Different Years. Khudozhestvennaya literatura. [In Russian].

Berdnikov, G. (1984). A. P. Chekhov. Ideological and Creative Pursuits. Khudozhestvennaya literatura. [In Russian].

Bible. The books of the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testaments. Synodal translation. (n.d.). Retrieved December 29, 2023, from https://azbyka.ru/biblia/ [In Russian].

Gitovich, N. (1955). Chronicle of Chekhov’s Life and Work. Goslitizdat. [In Russian].

Goryacheva, M. (1992). The Problem of Space in the Art World of A. P. Chekhov [Cand. Sci. (Philol.) dissertation]. [In Russian].

Demidova, T. (2019). N. V. Gogol’s interpretation of the “ladder” by I. Lesvichnik in the Dead Souls. In Gogol’s Readings. Retrieved December 29, 2023, from https://www.domgogolya.ru/science/researches/15757/ [In Russian].

Dostoevsky, F. (1972–1990). The Complete Collection of Writings (Vols. 1–30). Nauka. [In Russian].

Kozmin, V. (1999). Mikhailovsky’s Locus in the Poetic Work of A. S. Pushkin [Cand. Sci. (Philol.) dissertation]. [In Russian].

Komarov, S. (2002). A. Chekhov–V. Mayakovsky: a comedian in dialogue with Russian culture of the late XIX – first third of the XX century [Dr. Sci. (Philol.) dissertation]. [In Russian].

Cubasov, A. (2015). Friedrich Nietzsche in russian prose at the end of the century: Ironists and adherents (A. P. Chekhov, P. D. Boborykin). Ural Philological Bulletin, (3), 158–174. [In Russian].

Climacus, J. (2013). The Ladder of Divine Ascent. Izdatelstvo Sretenskogo monastyrya. [In Russian].

Likhachev, D. (1979). The Poetics of Ancient Russian Literature. Nauka. [In Russian].

Lotman, Yu. (1988). The artistic space in Gogol’s prose. In At the School of the Poetic Word: Pushkin. Lermontov (pp. 251–292). Prosveshchenie. [In Russian].

Maslova, A. (2003). The Poetics of the Chronotope in the Early Works by B. Pasternak [Cand. Sci. (Philol.) dissertation]. [In Russian].

Menchikov, G. (2015). On the “rediscovery” of space and time and their specifics in social and humanitarian knowledge. Scientific Notes of Kazan University, (1). https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/o-pereotkrytii-prostranstva-i-vremeni-i-ih-spetsifike-v-sotsialno-... [In Russian].

Mosin, I. (2016). A Large Illustrated Encyclopedia. Impressionism. SZKEO. [In Russian].

Nietzsche, F. (2007). Thus Spoke Zarathustra. In F. Nietzsche, The Complete Collection of Writings and Letters. Vols. 1–30 (Vol. 4). [In Russian].

Propp, V. (2000). The Historical Roots of the Fairy Tale. Labirint. [In Russian].

Razumova, N. (2001). The Work of A. P. Chekhov in the Aspect of Space. Tomsk State University. [In Russian].

Ryken, L., Wilhoit, J. C., & Longman III, T. (Eds.). (2005). Dictionary of Biblical Imagery. Bibkiya dlya vsekh. [In Russian].

Sukhih, I. (2007). Problems of A. P. Chekhov’s poetics. Faculty of Philology of St. Petersburg State University. [In Russian].

Chekhov, A. (1974–1983). The Complete Collection of Writings and Letters (Vols. 1–30). Nauka. [In Russian].

Chudakov, A. (1986). Chekhov’s World: Emergence and Formation. Sovetskiy pisatel. [In Russian].

Chudakov, A. (1971). Chekhov’s Poetics. Nauka. [In Russian].

Schopenhauer, A. (2011). The world as will and representation. In A. Schopenhauer, The Complete Collection of Writings. Vol. 1. Respublika. [In Russian].

Eliade, M. (2015). Shamanism and Archaic Ecstasy Techniques. Ladomir. [In Russian].

Yampolsky, M. (2022). The return of Adam. ID Ivana Limbakha.