Creating a database of Modern Russian clause linkers: principles, problems, results

About the authors:

Irina M. Kobozeva, Dr. Sci. (Philol.), Professor, Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Leading Researcher, Laboratory for Study and Preservation of Minority Languages, Institute of Linguistics (RAS), Moscow, Russia. kobozeva@list.ru; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4214-2878
Natalia V. Serdobolskaya , Cand. Sci. (Philol.), Senior Researcher, Laboratory for Study and Preservation of Minority Languages, Institute of Linguistics (RAS); Senior Researcher Pushkin State Russian Language Institute, Moscow, Russia. serdobolskaya@gmail.com
Anastasia I. Kryukova, Master Student, Department of Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Lomonosov Moscow State University; Research Assistant, Laboratory for Study and Preservation of Minority Languages, Institute of Linguistics (RAS), Moscow, Russia nastyakryukova0077@gmail.com
Diana A. Pilyugina, Master Student, Faculty of International Relations, Diplomatic Academy of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation, Research Assistant, Laboratory for Study and Preservation of Minority Languages, Institute of Linguistics (RAS), Moscow, Russia

Abstract:

This paper presents a project on creating a database of Russian connectives (clause linkers), which are linguistic units that connect clauses in polypredicative constructions. This functional class includes conjunctions, particles, prepositional phrases, adverbs, and parenthetical words and phrases. The inventory of connectives was extracted from volume 2 of the “Russkaya Grammatika” (1982), explanatory dictionaries, and dictionaries of functional words. All connectives were manually tagged for various syntactic and semantic parameters, such as their position in a sentence, the relative positioning of the main and subordinate clause, the number of connective components, and the possibility to expand them by adding modifiers (e. g., по той причине что — по той простой причине что). Additionally, all connectives were categorized based on the semantic zone they belong to, such as condition, time, cause, etc. The systematic tagging of connectives allowed for the discovery of several new semantic zones, meanings, varieties of meaning combinations, and new valency structures. Furthermore, problematic connectives were delimited, such as those posing issues regarding their part of speech or their treatment as a collocation (в тот момент, когда; в тех целях чтобы, etc.). This article is based on a paper presented at the 7th International Research Symposium “Russian Grammar: Constants, Contexts, Perspectives” (October 10–14, 2023, Tyumen, Russia).

References:

Gerasimov, D. V. (2022). On two types of dicendial markers of reason (mainly in Eurazian languages). Voprosy jazykoznanija, (2), 7–29. [In Russian]

Efremova, T. F. (2004). Еxplanatory dictionary of the Russian functional parts of speech. Astrel’, AST. [In Russian]

Evgen’eva A. P. (Ed.). (1981–1984). Dictionary of the Russian Language: In 4 vols. Russkiy yazyk.

Zaika, N. M. (2019). Polypredicative causative constructions in world languages: the space of typological possibilities. Voprosy jazykoznanija, 4, 7–32. [In Russian]

Zacman, I. M., In’kova, O. Ju., Kruzhkov, M. G., Popkova, N. A. (2016). Representation of cross-lingual knowledge of connectors in superset databases. Informatika i ee primenenija, 10(1), 106–118. [In Russian]

In’kova, O., Manzotti, E. (2019). Connectivity of the text: mereological logic-semantic relations. Izdatel’skij dom JaSK. [In Russian]

Iomdin, L. L. (2014). Khorosho menya tam ne bylo: syntax and semantics of a class of Russian colloquial constructions. In M. Nomachi, A. Danylenko, & P. Piper (Eds.). Grammaticalization and Lexicalization in the Slavic Languages. Proceedings from the 36th meeting of the commission on the Grammatical Structure of the Slavic Languages of the International Committee of Slavists. Verlag Otto Sagner.

Iordanskaja, L. N. (1988). Semantics of the Russian conjunction raz (contrasted with some other Russian conjunctions). Russian Linguistics, 12(3), 239–267. [In Russian]

Kibrik, A. A., & Podlesskaja, V. I. (Eds.). (2009). Night Dream Stories: A corpus study of spoken Russian discourse. Jazyki slavjanskih kul’tur. [In Russian]

Kuznecov, S. A. (Ed.). (1998). Big explanatory dictionary of the Russian language. Norint. [In Russian]

Morkovkin, V. V. (Ed.) (2003). Еxplanatory dictionary of Russian: structure words: prepositions, conjunctions, particles, interjections, parentheticals, pronouns, numerals, copulative verbs: about 1200 units. Gos. in-t rus. jaz. im. A. S. Pushkina. Astrel’, AST. [In Russian]

Russian National Corpus. (2003–2023). https://ruscorpora.ru

Sannikov, V. Z. 2005. Illocutionary use or syntactic ellipsis? Russkiy yazyk v nauchnom osveshchenii, (2), 121–136.

Ushakov, D. N. (1935–1940). Еxplanatory Russian dictionary. Sovetskaja enciklopedija. [In Russian]

Shimchuk, E. G., & Schur, M. G. (1999). Dictionary of Russian particles. Peter Lang. [In Russian]

Haspelmath, M., & König, E. (1998). Concessive conditionals in the languages of Europe. In J. van der Auwera(Ed.). Adverbial Constructions in the Languages of Europe (pp. 563–640). De Gruyter Mouton.

Kortmann, B. (2012). Adverbial Subordination: A Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages. Walter de Gruyter.

Mann, W. C., & Thompson S. A. (1988). Rhetorical Structure Theory: Toward a functional theory of text organization. Text, 8(3), 243–281.

Thompson, S. A., & Longacre, R. E. (1985). Adverbial clauses. In T. Shopen (Ed.). Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. 2: Complex constructions. Cambridge University Press.

Tsunoda, T. (2018). Levels in Clause Linkage. (Comparative Handbooks of Linguistics, 2). Mouton de Gruyter.

Wierzbicka, А. (1971). Metatekst w tekście. In M. R. Mayenova (Ed.). O spójności textu (pp. 105–121). Wroclaw — Warsawa — Kraków — Gdańsk.