Lexical representations of sensory images in Osip Mandelstam’s lyrics

About the author:

Nadezhda V. Razumkova, Cand. Sci. (Philol.), Associate Professor, Department of Russian Language and Linguistics, University of Tyumen; 18nadezhda3@mail.ru; ORCID: 0000-0003-3260-2076

Abstract:

This article is dedicated to the 100th anniversary of the publication of Osip Mandelstam’ “Tristia”. The relevance of this research lies in the anthropological vector of contemporary linguistics, which focuses its attention on the studies of authorial linguistic personality within their world-image. The anthropocentricity of Mandelstam’s poetry can be seen in his active use of lexemes with the semantics of visual, auditory, olfactory, gustatory, and tactile sensations. This article aims to study the structural and semantic content of sensory images in Mandelstam’s poetry. The objectives include estimating the influence of the text’s genre on author’s representation of sensations and experiences. The theoretical part discusses the methodological foundations of the study and highlights the factors influencing the interpretation of creative works. In the practical part, the author describes the methods of lexicalization of the complex of sensory images, connected by an ideological and semantic commonality with the category of emotivism. The sphere of artistic perception is illustrated by quotations from poems. The conclusion presents the results of a contextual analysis of different types of sensations embodied in verbal data. The study of the composition and structure of text units is based on such parameters as the way of perception (sight, hearing, touch, smell, taste), the principle of describing the lyrical situation (direct — figurative), and the principle of relating to different spheres of life (physi­cal, mental, social). The conclusions are the following: 1) in the analyzed material, semantic relations in the field of perception are closely connected with the idea of gravity; 2) lexical means of expressing sensory impressions have a metaphorical and metonymic motivation; 3) sensory complexes are formed at the intersection of visual, acoustic, tactile, olfactory, gustatory images (the listing corresponds to the descending order of word usage); 4) synthetic combination of individual aspects of sensory perception is carried out in various forms (agglutination, amplification, word typing); 5) repeating the Ovid’s genre experiment, Mandelstam created an ori­ginal literary and historical metaphor, through which he told, with his characteristic creative courage, about his time and about himself, using the impressive possibilities of the language as a means of poetic thought.

References:

1. Averintsev S. S. 1996. “Destiny and news of Osip Mandelstam”. In: Poets, pp. 189-276. Moscow: Yazyki russkoy kultury. [In Russian]
2. Artemiyeva G. M. 2012. Mandelstam Code. Moscow: Astrel. 288 pp.[In Russian]
3. Bystrov N. V. 2004. “On the ontological status of words in Mandelstam’s poetry”. News of Ural State University, no. 33, pp. 87-97. [In Russian]
4. Wierzbicka A. 2001. Comparison of Cultures through Vocabulary and Pragmatics. Translated from English by A. D. Schmelev. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Cultures. 272 pp. [In Russian]
5. Gasparov M. L. 1995. Selected Articles. Moscow: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenir. 480 pp. [In Russian]
6. Gasparov M. L. 1978. “Ovid in exile”. In: Gasparov M. L., Osherov S. A. (eds.). Publius Ovid Nason. Tristia. Letters from Pontus, pp. 189-224. Moscow: Nauka. [In Russian]
7. Karaulov Yu. N. 1987. Russian Language and Linguistic Personality: Monograph. Moscow: Nauka. 264 pp. [In Russian]
8. Kornilov O. V. 2003. Language Pictures of the World as Derivatives of National Mentalities. Moscow: ChRo. 349 pp. [In Russian]
9. Lotman Yu. M. “Literary text structure”. Infolio: Electronic Library. Accessed 3 March 2021. https://www.modernlib.net/books/lotman_yuriy/struktura_hudozhestvennogo_teksta/read/ [In Russian]
10. Mandelshtam N. Ya. 2006. “Third book. Memories”. Moscow: Agraf. 560 pp. [In Russian]
11. Mandelstam O. E. 1991. “Literary Moscow”. In: Mandelstam O. E. Collected Works in 4 vols. Vol. 2. Edited by G. P. Struve and B. A. Filippov. Pp. 326-331. Moscow: Terra. [In Russian]
12. Mandelstam O. E. 1991. “Talk about Dante”. In: Mandelstam O. E. Collected Works in 4 vols. Vol. 2. Edited by G. P. Struve and B. A. Filippov. Pp. 366-413. Moscow: Terra. [In Russian]
13. Mandelstam O. E. 1991. “Word and culture In: Mandelstam O. E. Collected Works in 4 vols. Vol. 2. Edited by G. P. Struve and B. A. Filippov. Pp. 222-227. Moscow: Terra. [In Russian]
14. Mandelshtam O. E. 1991. “Tristia”. In: Mandelstam O. E. Collected Works in 4 vols. Vol. 2. Edited by G. P. Struve and B. A. Filippov. Pp. 55-91. Moscow: Terra. [In Russian]
15. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Yu. 1993. Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language. Moscow: AZ. 960 pp. [In Russian]
16. Panova L. G. 2003. “World”, “Space”, “Time” in the Poetry of Osip Mandelstam: Monograph. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoy kultury. 808 pp. [In Russian]
17. Petruchenko O. 1914. Latin-Russian Dictionary. Reprinted 9th edition. Moscow. 810 pp. [In Russian]
18. Rogacheva N. A. 2010. Olfactory Space of Russian Poetry of the Late 19th — Early 20th Centuries: Problems of Poetics: Monograph. Tyumen: Publishing House of Tyumen State University. 404 pp.[In Russian]
19. Ruzin I. G. 1994. “Cognitive naming strategies: Perception modes (sight, hearing, touch, smell, taste) and their expression in language”. Voprosy yazykoznaniya, no. 6, pp. 79-100. [In Russian]
20. Florensky P. A. “Reverse perspective”. In: Florensky P. A. Works in 4 vols. Vol. 3 (1), pp. 46-98. Accessed 16 June 2022. http://www.philologoz.ru/florensky/fl_persp.htm [In Russian]
21. Chudinov A. P. 2012. “Postulates of the Ural political metaphorology”. Ural Philological Bulletin. Series “Language. System. Personality: Linguistics of Creativity”, no. 2, pp. 85-93. [In Russian]