Indirect speech acts of modern communication: speech genre of hidden request

Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates


Release:

2022, Vol. 8. № 3 (31)

Title: 
Indirect speech acts of modern communication: speech genre of hidden request


For citation: Bagirova E. P., Gavrikova E. O. 2022. “Indirect speech acts of modern communication: speech genre of hidden request”. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates, vol. 8, no. 3 (31), pp. 6-22

About the authors:

Elena P. Bagirova, Cand. Sci. (Philol.), Assistant Professor, Department of General Linguistics, Tyumen State University; bagirovaelena@mail.ru

Elina O. Gavrikova, Cand. Sci. (Philol.), Associate Professor, Department of General Linguistics, University of Tyumen; elina_gavrikova@mail.ru

Abstract:

This article analyzes the phenomena that have developed in the field of expressing will in contemporary speech communication. Namely, the illocutionary goals of imperative indirect speech and ways of implementing indirect imperativeness at the lexical and grammatical levels. Additionally, the authors describe markers of hidden forms of motivation and factors, which determine the degree of motivation, and reveal non-imperative forms of motivation. The theoretical basis of the work includes the works by N. I. Formanovskaya, A. Vezhbitskaya, J. Searle, M. Ya. Blokh , G. G. Yarmarkina and other researchers of the phenomenon of directive speech acts. The article analyzes request forms in indirect speech presented as declarative and interrogative sentences. The authors establish that communicative acts expressing will are implemented by a variety of linguistic means and models aimed at softening the expression of a request. For example, among declarative sentences, there are constructions with the lexeme хочу (“I want”), predicative adverbs надо (“need”), нужно (“necessary”), etc.; among interrogative sentences — interrogatives with the modal part правда (“truth”), modal constructions with хотеть (“want”) and мочь (“to be able”), indirect directives containing the interrogative indicative of the verb of the causal action with the negative particle не (“not”). A speaker’s choice of a specific means and form of request affects its assessment as categorical, neutral, polite and over-polite.

References:

  1. Gak V. G. 1982. “Pragmatics, usage and grammar of speech”. Foreign Languages at School, no. 5, pp. 7-11. [In Russian]
  2. Klyuev E. V. 2002. Speech Communication: The Success of Speech Interaction. Moscow: RIPOL Classic. 316 pp. [In Russian]
  3. Mozhde D. Kh. 2014. “The request of modern Russian speech in an indirect form”. Bulletin of the Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia. Series: Theory of Language. Semiotics. Semantics, no. 3, pp. 175-183. [In Russian]
  4. Paducheva E. V. 2011. Semantic Studies: Semantics of Time and Aspect in the Russian Language. The Semantics of Narrative. 2nd edition, revised. Moscow: Languages of Slavic Culture. 480 pp. [In Russian]
  5. Searle J. R. 1986. “Indirect speech acts”. In: New in Foreign Linguistics, no. 17: Theory of Speech Acts, pp. 195-222. Moscow: Progress. [In Russian]
  6. Evgenieva A. P. (ed.). 1999. Dictionary of the Russian Language in 4 vols. 4th edition. Vol. 1. A-Y. 702 pp.; Vol. 2. K-O. 736 pp.; Vol. 3. P-R. 750 pp.; Vol. 4. S-Ya. 797 pp. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Linguistic Research; Russian Language; Polygraphresources. [In Russian]
  7. Ushakov D. N. (ed.). 2014. Explanatory Dictionary of the Modern Russian Language. Moscow: Adelant. 800 pp. [In Russian]
  8. Formanovskaya N. I. 1998. Communicative-Pragmatic Aspects of Units of Communication. Moscow. 291 pp. [In Russian]
  9. Shiryaev E. N. 2000. “The structure of intentional dialogue in spoken language”. Active Language Processes at the End of the 20th Century: Abstracts of the International Conference of the 4th Shmelyov Readings (23-25 February, Moscow, Russia), p. 84. [In Russian]