Wolfram von Soden’s Listenwissenschaft and the problem of interpreting Sumerian lexical lists

Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates


Release:

2022, Vol. 8. № 2 (30)

Title: 
Wolfram von Soden’s Listenwissenschaft and the problem of interpreting Sumerian lexical lists


For citation: Grigorishyn S. V. 2022. “Wolfram von Soden’s Listenwissenschaft and the problem of interpreting Sumerian lexical lists”. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates, vol. 8, no. 2 (30), pp. 94-132. DOI: 10.21684/2411-197X-2022-8-2-94-132

About the author:

Sergey V. Grigorishyn, Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Associate Professor, Department of Archeology, Ancient History, and Middle Ages, Tyumen State University; s.v.grigorishyn@gmail.com; ORCID: 0000-0002-2509-6382

Abstract:

The subject of this study is the Listenwissenschaft theory by German Assyriologist Wolfram von Soden. Since there are two editions of this theory — 1936 and 1960, respectively — it should be clarified that our analysis is devoted to a later version of W. von Soden‘s theory. A detailed description of the elements of this theory is followed by ist systematization, the results of which are reflected in the intellectual map presented in the study. Since the Listenwissenschaft was often criticized for being abstract and speculative, the views of W. von Soden‘s critics were introduced into the study.

As a result of the analysis of this criticism, the author of this article comes to the conclusion that the main argument of the Listenwissenschaft theory — the presence of a system in lexical lists — remained unshaken after the criticism. This, in turn, leads to the conclusion that W. von Soden’s theory is included in the field of research of philosophical thought in Assyriology, which makes it possible to clarify the epistemological foundations of the Sumerian and Babylonian lexical lists.

The novelty of the study lies in the fact that the Listenwissenschaft for the first time since 1999 (the time of the publication of an article by W. von Soden’s student, D.-O. Edzard) was presented in a positive light, which, in turn, prompts a re-examination of this theory in order to solve the epistemological tasks set for Assyriology, in particular, in the context of the discussion about lexical lists.

The study applies the method of phenomenology of religion in the edition of J. Waanderburg.

References:

  1. Grigorishin S. V. 2016. “Significance of the theory of dynamic cultures for the study of Ancient Eastern canonical books”. Philosophy and Politics, no. 4, pp. 35-41. [In Russian]
  2. Grigorishyn S. V. 2016. “Benno Landsberger’s theory of the specific concepts of the ancient near east cultures”. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 113-128. DOI: 10.21684/2411-197X-2016-2-4-113-128 [In Russian]
  3. Grigorishin S. V. 2014. “Between Oppenheim and Kramer: the role of scientific attitude in the study of Middle Eastern mythology”. Tirosh, no. 14, pp. 58-70. [In Russian]
  4. Dyakonov I. M. 1980. “Babylonian philology (III-I thousand B. C.)”. History of Linguistic Doctrines. The Ancient World, pp. 17-37. Leningrad: Nauka. [In Russian]
  5. Dyakonov I. M. 1982. “Scientific ideas in the ancient East (Sumer, Babylonia, West Asia)”. Essays on the History of Natural-Science Knowledge in Antiquity, pp. 59-119. Moscow: Nauka. [In Russian]
  6. Zoden W. von. Bilingualism in the Spiritual Culture of Babylonia. (Manuscript). [In Russian]
  7. Landsberger B. The Peculiarity of the Babylonian World. (Manuscript). [In Russian]
  8. Landsberger B. The spiritual achievements of the Sumerians. (Manuscript). [In Russian]
  9. Oppenheim A. L. 1990. Ancient Mesopotamia. Portrait of a Lost Civilization. Moscow: Nauka. [In Russian]
  10. Sharpen D. 2009. Reading and Writing in Babylonia. Moscow: Izdatelsvo RGGU. [In Russian]
  11. Edzard D.-O. Science of the Sumero-Akkadian lists and other aspects of ancient Mesopotamian rationality. Translated from German by A. Vedrov. (Manuscript). [In Russian]
  12. Bottéro J. La religion babylonienne / J. Bottéro. Paris, 1952.
  13. Bottéro J. Mésopotamie: l’écriture, la raison et les dieux / J. Bottéro. Gallimard, 1987.
  14. Cavigneaux A. Lexikalischelisten / A. Cavigneaux // Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie. Berlin; New York. Walter de Gruyter, 1980-1983. Band 6. S. 609-641.
  15. Civil M. Lexicography / M. Civil // Sumerological Studies in Honor of Thorkild Jacobsen. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1975. Pp. 123-157.
  16. Deimel A. Pantheon Babylonicum oder Keilschriftkatalog der Babylonicum Genesis / A. Deimel. Rome: Verlag der Pӓpstl. Bibelinstituts, 1950.
  17. Dhorme E. La Religion assyro-babylonienne: conférences données à l’Institut catholique de Paris / E. Dhorme. Paris, 1910.
  18. Dhorme E. Les religions de Babylonie et d’Assyrie / E. Dhorme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France, 1945.
  19. Edzard D. O. Sumerisch-akkadische Listenwissenschaft und andere Aspekte altmesopotamischer Rationalität / D. O. Edzard // Rationalitätstypen. Freiberg/München: Verlag Karl Alber, 1999. S. 246-267.
  20. Falkenstein A. Grammatik der Sprache Gudeas von Lagaš / A. Falkenstein. Rome, 1949-1950. 2 Bӓnde.
  21. Hilgert M. Von ‚Listenwissenschaft‘ und ‚epistemischen Dingen‘. Konzeptuelle Annäherungen an altorientalische Wissenspraktiken / M. Hilgert // Journal for General Philosophy of Science. 2009. № 40. S. 277-309.
  22. Jacobsen T. The Treasures of Darkness. A History of Mesopotamian Religion / T. Jacobsen. New Haven; London, 1976.
  23. Kramer S. N. History Begins at Sumer: Thirty-Nine Firsts in Man’s Recorded History / S. N. Kramer. University of Pennsylvania Press, 1956.
  24. Krebernik M. Götter und Mythen des Alten Orients / M. Krebernik. C. H. Beck: München, 2012.
  25. Labat R. Le Caractére religieux de la royauté assyro-babylonienne / R. Labat. Paris, 1939.
  26. Lambert W. Göttergenealogie / W. Lambert // Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie. Berlin; New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1957. Band 3. S. 469-470.
  27. Lambert W. Götterlisten / W. Lambert // Reallexikon der Assyriologie und Vorderasiatischen Archäologie. Berlin; New York. Walter de Gruyter, 1957. Band 3. S. 473-479.
  28. Landsberger B. Die Eigenbegrifflichkeit der babylonischen Welt / B. Landsberger // Islamica. 1926. № 2. S. 355-372.
  29. Landsberger B. Die geistigen Leistungen der Sumerer / B. Landsberger // Ankara Dil ve Tarih Çoğrafya Fakültesi Dergisi. 1945. № 3. S. 150-158.
  30. Meissner B. Babylonien und Assyrien / B. Meissner. Heidelberg, 1920-1925. Band I-II.
  31. Oppenheim A. L. Ancient Mesopotamia: Portrait of a Dead Civilization / A. L. Oppenheim. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1964.
  32. Politheismus und Monotheismus in den Religion des Vorderen Orients. Münster, 2002.
  33. Soden W. von. Leistung und Grenze sumerischer und babylonischer Wissenschaft / W. von Soden // Die Welt als Geschichte. Zeitschrift für universalgeschichtliche Forschung. 1936. № 2. S. 411-464; 509-557.
  34. Soden W. von. Zweisprachigkeit in der geistigen Kultur Babyloniens / W. von Soden. Wien, 1960.
  35. Veldhuis N. History of the Cuneiform Lexical Tradition / N. Veldhuis. Münster: Ugarit- Verlag, 1999.
  36. What is God? Anthropomorophic and Non-anthropomorphic ascpects of Deity in Ancient Mesopotamia. Winona Lake, 2009.
  37. Zimmern H. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der babylonischen Religion / H. Zimmern. Leipzig, 1901.
  38. Zimmern H. Zur Herstellung der großen babylonischen Götterliste An=(ilu) Anum / H. Zimmern. Leipzig, 1911. S. 83-125.