Article 29/39 of the Magna Carta in the Public Controversy of the Late 16th Century

About the author:

Abstract:

The article is devoted to the reception life of Article 29/39 of the Magna Carta in the political and right-wing controversy of England at the end of the 16^th century. It is shown that the Magna Carta, which fell out of use in the late Middle Ages, returned to the political and right-wing space in the Elizabethan era. It was customary to use the Magna Carta in the 1225 edition, otherwise the edition of Henry III, which was confirmed more than 30 times and was perceived as an act of parliament. An analysis of the treatises of common law jurists William Fleetwood and Robert Snape led to the conclusion that the Magna Carta was considered a document that restored the ancient best and just right, trampled by the Norman invasion, and ensured continuity with the beyond the memory of British antiquity. Article 29 was considered the core and quintessence of the liberties and rights of subjects. A study of the controversy between common law lawyers James Maurice, Robert Beale and civilist Richard Coisin around the judicial powers of the High Commission, its ex officio inquisition procedure and specific incidents of persecution of nonconformist priests led to the conclusion that these common law lawyers insisted on the fundamental nature of Article 29, on the unlawfulness of the prosecutions, the inability of the commission to issue criminal sentences and to use the ex officio inquisition oath. They argued that the royal authority did not have the prerogative to create commissions in violation of Article 29. Civilist Richard Coisin objected that ecclesiastical jurisdiction is an independent branch of law and is not subject to Magna Carta.

References:

1. Petrushevskiy D. M. (ed.). 1936. “Magna Carta (1215)”. Monuments of the History of England 11^th-13^th centuries. Moscow: State Social and Economic Publishing House. Pp. 96-117. [In Russian]

2. Erokhin V. N. (ed.). 2009. Formation of the Anglican Church in the 16^th — first decades of the 17^th centuries in Covering Contemporary British Historiography: A Monograph. Nizhnevartovsk: Nizhnevartovsk Humanitarian University Publishing House. 329 p. [In Russian]

3. Stewart A. 2012. “A Discourse upon the Commission of Bridewell”. Oxford Francis Bacon. Vol. 1: Early Writings 1584-96. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Pp. 51-60.

4. Baker J. 2017. Reinvention of Magna Carta 1216-1616. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 570 p.

5. Cosin R. 1591. Apologie: of, and for Sundrie Proceedings by Jurisdiction Ecclesiasticall. London: Imprinted by the Deputies of Christopher Baker, Printer to the Queenes most excellent Maiestie. 255 p.

6. Helmholz R. H. 1990. Roman Canon Law in Reformation England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. xxiv, 209.

7. Morrice J. 1590. Briefe Treatise of Oathes Exacted by Ordinaries and Ecclesiasticall Iudges, to Answere Generallie to All Such Articles or Interrogatories, as Pleaseth Them to Propound. And of Their Forced and Constrained Oathes Ex Officio, Wherein is Proued That the Same Are Vnlawfull. Middleburg. 58 p.

8. McGlynn M. 2003. Royal Prerogative and Learning of the Inns of Court. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 386 p.

9. McKechnie W. S. 1914. Magna Carta: A Commentary on the Great Charter of King John, with an Historical Introduction, by W. S. McKechnie. Glasgow: James MaClehose and Sons. 530 p.

10. Neale J. E (ed.). 1957. Elizabethan and Her Parliaments: 1584-1601. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Vol. 2. 452 p.

11. Snagg R. 1654. Antiquity and Original of Court of Chancery and Authority of Lord Chancellor of England Being a Branch of Serjeant Snagg’s reading, upon the 28 Chapter of Magna Charta, at the Middle Temple, in Lent, 13 Eliz. With His Congratulatory Epistle, (By Way of Preface) to the Lord Chancellor Hatton, in 29 Eliz. London. 88 p.

12. Tanner J. R. (ed.). 1940. Tudor Constitutional Documents a.d. 1485-1603 with Historical Commentary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp. xxiv, 636.

13. Thompson F. 1948. Magna Carta: Its Role in the Making of the English constitution 1300-1629. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 410 p.

14. Usher R. 1913. Rise and Fall of the High Commission. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 380 p.