Anthropomorphic Metaphorical Models in Conceptual Field “Nature” in the Poetry of S. Yesenin and of Hǎi Zi

Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates


Release:

2021, Vol. 7. № 4 (28)

Title: 
Anthropomorphic Metaphorical Models in Conceptual Field “Nature” in the Poetry of S. Yesenin and of Hǎi Zi


For citation: Kupchik E. V., Ma Xun. 2021. “Anthropomorphic Metaphorical Models in Conceptual Field “Nature” in the Poetry of S. Yesenin and of Hǎi Zi”. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates, vol. 7, no. 4 (28), pp. 60-77. DOI: 10.21684/2411-197X-2021-7-4-60-77

About the authors:

Elena V. Kupchik, Dr. Sci. (Philol.), Professor, Department of Russian Language and General Linguistics, University of Tyumen; e.v.kupchik@utmn.ru

Ma Xun, Senior Lecturer, Department of Russian, Qufu Normal University (China); maxun198821@sina.com

Abstract:

The article presents the analysis of metaphorical models that are characterized by nature phenomena’s adaptation of human traits in the poetry of S. Yesenin and of Hǎi Zi (often called “Chinese Yesenin”). The study of cognitive models in their linguacultural representations as well as the research on metaphors as a mean of perception of national worldview persist to appear often in linguistic discourse and are still considered to be a promising area in linguistics. The novelty of the present article is due to the study of anthropomorphic metaphors of these two poets as a cognitive phenomenon and due to its comparative nature. The subject of the research is comparative tropes that are manifestations of metaphorical models in poetic texts of the Russian and Chinese poets. The aim of the work is to reveal and to characterize anthropomorphic metaphors of nature in the poems of S. Yesenin and Hǎi Zi. The research methodology includes the descriptive and the comparative methods as well as the method of quantitative estimation. The research resulted in description of composition of nature objects that are within target domain of anthropomorphic metaphors as well as of objects within source domain. The authors of the research also present topic classification of language material, define nature things reflected in anthropomorphic metaphors that are significant for each of these two poets. In addition, the common and different characteristics of anthropomorphic metaphors of S. Yesenin and Hǎi Zi are highlighted. It was discovered that both of these poets use anthropomorphic metaphors to describe the whole spectrum of nature things related to flora and fauna, natural phenomena, as well as to earth, water and air space. The research is concluded by stating that the expression of individual poetic identity of both poets coexists with the reflection of features of national cultures in anthropomorphic metaphors.

References:

  1. Black M. 1990. “Metaphor”. In: Arutyunova N. D., Zhurinskaya M. A. (eds.). 1990. Theory of Metaphor, pp. 153-173. Moscow: Progress. [In Russian]

  2. Boldyreva E. M. 2021. “Hai Zi — Chinese Sergei Yesenin: tanatological poetics and ‘romance with death’”. Vestnik of Kostroma State University, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 151-161. DOI: 10.34216/1998-0817-2021-27-4-151-161 [In Russian]

  3. Budaev E. V. 2010. “Comparative political metaphorology”. Dr. Sci. (Philol.) diss. Ekaterinburg. 474 p. [In Russian]

  4. Wang X. 2017. “S. A Yesenin and Chinese poet Hai Zi: biographic and artistic parallels”. Modern studies on S. Yesenin, no. 2 (41), pp. 14-18. [In Russian]

  5. Wang X. 2021. “Hai-Zi’s poetic cycle ‘Yesenin, the Poet” as an important step in literary analysis of Yesenin‘s poetic heritage in China”. Foreign Languages in Tertiary Education, no. 1 (56), pp. 24-34. DOI: 10.37724/RSU.2021.56.1.003 [In Russian]

  6. Voronova O. E. 2002. Sergei Yesenin and Russian Spiritual Culture: Monograph. Ryazan: Uzorechie. 520 p. [In Russian]

  7. Kasatkin L. L., Klobukov E. V., Lekant P. A. 1991. Short Reference of Contemporary Russian. Edited by P. A. Lekant. Moscow: Vyshaya Shkola. 383 p. [In Russian]

  8. Kupchik E. V. 2021. “Metaphorical models with the HUMAN subjective zone in the poetry of A. Mariengoff and S. Yesenin”. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates, vol. 7, no. 2 (26), pp. 23-41. DOI: 10.21684/2411-197X-2021-7-2-23-41 [In Russian]

  9. Lakoff G., Johnson M. 2008. Metaphors We Live by: Translation from English. Edited by and Foreword by A. N. Baranov. 2nd Edition. Moscow: LKI Publishing house. 256 p. [In Russian]

  10. Ma Xun, Ertner D. E. 2017. “Metaphoric models and their symbolic representations in the poetry of S. Yesenin and Hai Zi”. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates, vol. 3, no 2, pp. 32-44. DOI: 10.21684/2411-197X-2017-3-2-32-44 [In Russian]

  11. Popova Z. D., Sternin I. A. 2003. Language and National Worldview. Voronezh: Istoki. 60 p. [In Russian]

  12. Postovalova V. I. 1998. “Worldview in human life”. In: Serebrennikov B. A. (ed.). 1998. The Role of Human Factor in Language. Language and Worldview, pp. 8-69. Moscow: Nauka. [In Russian]

  13. Rezanova Z. I., Abramova A A. 2014. “Anthropomorphic metaphorical interpretation of the conceptual sphere ‘vehicles’ (degree of metaphoricalness of the conceptual sphere and productivity of this metaphorical model)”. Tomsk State University Herald. Philology, no. 3 (29), pp. 60-73. [In Russian]

  14. Richards A. 1990. “The philosophy of rhetoric”. In: Arutyunova N. D., Zhurinskaya M. A. (eds.). 1990. Theory of Metaphor, pp. 44-67. Moscow: Progress. [In Russian]

  15. Samodelova E. A. 2010. “Yesenin as folklorist”. Issues of Scientific Biography of S. A. Yesenin: Collection of the Works of the Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Devoted to the 114th Anniversary of S. A. Yesenin (15-17 October 2009). Moscow; Konstantinovo; Ryazan: Pressa. Pp. 236-252. [In Russian]

  16. Sidelnikov V. M. 1974. Writer and Folk Poetry. Moscow: Sovremennik. 191 p. [In Russian]

  17. Tsybikova V. V. 2009. “Artistic images in Hai-Zi’s poetry (1964-1989)”. Buryat State University Herald. Oriental Studies, no. 8, pp. 209-213. [In Russian]

  18. Tsybikova V. V. 2012. “Artistic originality of Hai Zi’s poetry (1964-1989) and his role in Chinese literature”. Cand. Sci. (Philol.) diss. abstract. Moscow. 20 p. [In Russian]

  19. Chudinov A. P. 2001. Russia in a Metaphorical Mirror: Cognitive Research of Political Metaphor (1991-2000): monograph. Ekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University. 238 p. [In Russian]

  20. 顾蕴璞. 叶赛宁诗选. 北京: 外语教学与研2006. 275页. Gù Yùnpú. 2006. Selected Poems of S. A. Yesenin. Beijing: Wài Yǔ Jiào Xué Yǔ Yán. 275 p. [In Chinese]

  21. 海子. 海子诗集. 北京: 人民出版社, 2006. 278页. Hǎi Zi. 2006. Hǎi Zi De Shī. Poems of Hǎi Zi. Beijing: Rén Mín Chū Bǎn Shè. 278 p. [In Chinese]