Onomastic reflection in works of V. P. Krapivin

Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates


2019, Vol. 5. №2

Onomastic reflection in works of V. P. Krapivin

For citation: Labunets N. V., Kochneva N. S. 2019. “Onomastic reflection in works of V. P. Krapivin”. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates, vol. 5, no 2, pp. 6-19. DOI: 10.21684/2411-197X-2019-5-2-6-19

About the authors:

Natalia V. Labunets, Dr. Sci. (Philol.), Professor, Department of Russian Language and General Linguistics, University of Tyumen; eLibrary AuthorID, n.v.labunec@utmn.ru

Natalia S. Kochneva, Postgraduate Student, Department of Russian Language and General Linguistics, University of Tyumen; n.s.kochneva@utmn.ru


The subject under research is the relevant, but insufficiently studied phenomenon of onomastic reflection. The aim is to identify the specifics of onomastic reflexives in the space of fairy-tale texts of V.P. Krapivin in the aspect of language game. The works of V.P.  Krapivin (which he himself denoted as Krapivin’s tales) served as the source. Onomastic constructions (more than 1,500 units), included in the reflexive context of the author’s vision of the proper name, became the material of the research. Contextual and component analysis, as well as the techniques of the descriptive method (observation, interpretation, and systematization) are the main research methods. Based on the material of Krapivin’s texts, the heuristic nominativeness, onomastic loading of texts were first examined from the standpoint of the presentation of the estimated information contained in the metalinguistic statements-reflections on the proper name. The specificity of the studied reflexives is that they can be either explicitly or implicitly expressed estimations, coupled with different textual parameters — from the word-onym (quasi-reflexive) through the onomastic phrase to the detailed evaluative characteristic of the onomastic construction. A special feature of Krapivin’s onym is to be found in the author’s desire to show various functional facets of a proper name: onym-nominative — onym-characterizer. The manifestation of the reflective beginning in the text is carried out in various ways: by directly commenting on the proper name using special lexical means, syntactic constructions, as well as through its graphic (orthofraphic), phonetic design, structuring of the component composition. Associative links of the name, manifested through onomastic reflexives, create the effect of onomastic games.


  1. Boykova T. A. 2017. “Personal name as an object of language reflection (on the material of metalinguistic statements of Russians and Americans)”. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Moscow: Moscow State Pedagogical University. [In Russian]
  2. Vasilyeva N. V. 2009. A Proper Name in the World of Text. 2nd edition, revised. Moscow: URSS. [In Russian]
  3. Vepreva I. T. 2005. Language Reflection in the Post-Soviet Era. Moscow: Olma-press. [In Russian]
  4. Gridina T. A. 2013. Language Game in a Literary Text. 3rd edition, revised. Ekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University. [In Russian]
  5. Kochneva N. S. 2013. “‘Why such a name?’ (Interview with the writer V. P. Krapivin)”. In: Krapivin V. P. (ed.). Tales from the Other Side: Collection Of Novellas, Short Stories, Poems and Articles, pp. 144-157. Tyumen: University of Tyumen. [In Russian]
  6. Krapivin V. P. 2018. Steamboat “Grandpa Mazay”. Moscow: Iskatel. [In Russian]
  7. Krapivin V. P. 2000-2001. Collected Works: in 30 vols. Moscow: Tsentrpoligraf. [In Russian]
  8. Krapivin V. P. 2006. The Guardian of the Lopukhasty Islands. Moscow: Astrel. [In Russian]
  9. Krapivin V. P. 2018. The Tramp of Chess Horses. Moscow: Izdatelskiy dom Meshcheryakova. [In Russian]
  10. Kryukova I. V. 2012. “Proper name as an object of language reflection: research directions”. Proceedings of the 13th International Scientific Conference “Onomastics of the Volga Region” (13-14 September 2012, Yaroslavl). Edited by R. V. Razumov and V. I. Suprun. Pp. 8-12. Yaroslavl: Yaroslavl State Pedagogical University. [In Russian]
  11. Maksimov B. 1999. “Disturbing Tales”. Esli, no 3, pp. 207-215. Saint Petersburg. URL: https://www.fantlab.ru/work111706 [In Russian]
  12. Nikolina N. A. 2006. “Language and speech reflection in the plays of A. N. Ostrovsky”. Russian language at school, no 3, pp. 62-68. [In Russian]
  13. Perfilyeva N. P. 2006. Metatext in the Light of Text Categories. Novosibirsk: Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University. [In Russian]
  14. Sandzhi-Garyayeva Z. S. 1999. “Language reflection of Yu. Trifonov”. Stylistic Issues: Interuniversity Collection of Scientific Works, vol. 28, pp. 275-281. Saratov: Saratov State University. [In Russian]
  15. Trapeznikova A. A. 2010. “Onomastic consciousness of the modern citizen (based on the ergonymy of Krasnoyarsk)”. Cand. Sci. (Philol.). Krasnoyarsk: Siberian Federal University. [In Russian]
  16. Shumarina M. R. 2010. “Reflection of the proper name in fiction speech”. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference “Russian Studies of the 21st Century: traditions and trends”, pp. 286-289. Tambov: Izdatelstvo TOIPKRO. [In Russian]
  17. Shumarina M. R. 2011. Language in the Mirror of a Fiction Text (Meta-Language Reflection in Works of Russian Prose). Moscow: Flinta; Science. [In Russian]