On the model “The quality of the scientific text” (to clarify the concept of “logicality — psychological aspect”)

Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates


Release:

2019, Vol. 5. №1

Title: 
On the model “The quality of the scientific text” (to clarify the concept of “logicality — psychological aspect”)


For citation: Kotyurova M. P. 2019. “On the model ‘The quality of the scientific text’ (to clarify the concept of ‘logicality — psychological aspect’)”. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates, vol. 5, no 1, pp. 6-15. DOI: 10.21684/2411-197X-2019-5-1-6-15

About the author:

Maria P. Kotyurova, Dr. Sci. (Philol.), Professor, Department of Russian Language and Stylistics, Perm State National Research University; kotyurova@yandex.ru

Abstract:

The article represents one of the most significant features of scientific texts — “logicality — associativity” that was earlier developed in the model “The quality of the scientific text”. The author proposes to make a methodological specification and to replace the second notion by a more logical one — “psychological aspect”. In order to substantiate this specification, the author uses the arguments that relate to static and dynamic character of the stated knowledge. The dynamic manner of statement relates to the following additional senses: intensification, emphasis, addition, limitation, etc. It also relates to an individual style of thinking and speech that defines gradual expression of the psychological component of the communicative-cognitive activity of the author.

References:

  1. Bychko I. V., Zharikov E. S. 1965. “Scientific search”. In: Kopnin P. V., Popovich M. V. (eds). The Logic of Scientific Research. 1965. Moscow. [In Russian]
  2. Gak V. G. 1974. “On the semantic organization of the text”. In: Text Linguistics, part 1. 1974. Moscow. [In Russian]
  3. Gurova L. L. 1979. “Intuition and logic in the psychological structure of problem solving”. In: Semantics, logic and intuition in human mental activity: Psychological research, pp. 8-45. Moscow. [In Russian]
  4. Danilevskaya N. V. 2005. The Role of Evaluation in the Mechanism of the Deployment of Scientific Text. Perm State University Publishing House. [In Russian]
  5. Knyazeva E. N. 2000. “Topology of cognitive activity: synergistic approach”. In: Merkulova I. P. (ed.). 2000. Evolution. Language. Cognition, pp. 221-244. Moscow. [In Russian]
  6. Kozhina M. N., Titova L. M. 1976. “To the question of the author’s individuality in the scientific style of speech”. Issledovaniya po stilistike, vol. 5. Perm. [In Russian]
  7. Kotyurova M. P., Tikhomirova L. S., Solovyeva N. V. 2011. Idiostylistics of Scientific Speech. Our View of a Scientist’s Speech Individuality: Monograph. Perm: ZUIEP. [In Russian]
  8. Kotyurova M. P., Kushnina L. V. 2015. “On the devaluation and (not) demand for scientific knowledge”. In: Kotyurova M. P. (ed.). 2015. Stereotype and Creativity in the Text. Interacademic Collection of Scientific Papers, vol. 19, pp. 69-82. Perm. [In Russian]
  9. Kotyurova M. P. 1988. On the Extralinguistic Foundations of the Semantic Structure of a Scientific Text (Functional and Stylistic Aspect). Krasnoyarsk. [In Russian]
  10. Kotyurova M. P., Solovyeva N. V. 2017. The Modern Scientific Text (through the Prism of Discursive Changes): Monograph. Perm: Perm State National Research University. [In Russian]
  11. Kotyurova M. P. 2012. Stylistics of scientific speech: Textbook for Students of Institutions of Higher Education, 2d ed. Moscow: Akademiya. [In Russian]
  12. Ryabtseva N. K. 2018. “Integration of rational, emotional, and aesthetic in modern scientific communication”. Proceedings of the International Conference “Emotional Sphere of a Person in Language and Communication: Synchrony and Diachrony”, pp. 97-113. Moscow, Yaroslavl: Kantsler. [In Russian]
  13. Frolova O. E. 2018. “On the conceptualization of emotions (on the example of verbs and predicate expressions describing emotional states)”. Proceedings of the International Conference “Emotional Sphere of a Person in Language and Communication: Synchrony and Diachrony”, pp. 134-141. Moscow, Yaroslavl: Kantsler. [In Russian]
  14. Chzhan K. 2018. “Rationalization of emotions in etiquette communication situations”. Proceedings of the International Conference “Emotional Sphere of a Person in Language and Communication: Synchrony and Diachrony”, pp. 56-69. Moscow, Yaroslavl: Kantsler. [In Russian]
  15. Shakhovsky V. I. 2018. “Communication in the human emotional sphere: ecological and emotional intelligence”. Proceedings of the International Conference “Emotional Sphere of a Person in Language and Communication: Synchrony and Diachrony”, pp. 145-162. Moscow, Yaroslavl: Kantsler. [In Russian]