The Reception of N. V. Gogol’s Works in the Novel “Return to Egypt” by V. A. Sharov

About the authors:

Galina I. Danilina, Dr. Sci. (Philol.), Associate Professor, Department of Russian and Foreign Literature, University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia; g.i.danilina@utmn.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0100-0948

Olga V. Khavraleva, Postgraduate Student, Assistant, Department of Russian and Foreign Literature, University of Tyumen; olya.havraleva@yandex.ru

Abstract:

The subject of this article is the novel “Return to Egypt” (2013) by a distinguished contemporary writer V. A. Sharov. This novel has received a number of literary prizes, yet, it has not been sufficiently studied. This fact makes the novel topical for us. It is noteworthy that the novel is connected with N. V. Gogol’s works, which allows identifying the problem of the originality of the literary reception of the classic.

This article describes the type of the reception of classic literature based on the works of the well-known researchers, such as G. M. Vasilyeva and E. V. Abramovskikh.

The present paper foregrounds that along with the known types of literary reception (e. g., criticism, parody, selective interpretation), in the novel “Return to Egypt” by V. A. Sharov, there is also a completely new type of reception — completing a classic work. It reflects the connection of writers with the historical discourse about the fate of Russia in the world and appears as an evaluation form of national history.

References:

1. Abramovskikh E. V. 2007. Tipologiya kreativnoy retseptsii nezakonchennogo teksta (na materiale dopisyvanij nezakonchennykh proizvedenij A. S. Pushkina) [Typology of Creative Reception of an unfinished Text (On the Material of the Additions of Unfinished Works by A. S. Pushkin)]. Vestnik OGU, no 5, pp. 57-64.
2. Bloom H. 2011. “Strakh vliyaniya” [The Anxiety of Influence]. In: Sravnitel’noe literaturovedenie. Khrestomatiya, pp. 254-264. Tyumen: UTMN Publishing House.
3. Vasilyeva G. M. 2012. “‘Faust” Gyote i semanticheskiy kompleks evropeyskoy kul’tury. Monografiya [Goethe’s “Faust” and the Semantic Complex of European Culture]. Vol. 1. Novosibirsk: Novosibirskiy gosudastvenniy universitet ekonomiki i upravleniya.
4. Kozhinov V. V. et al. (eds.). 1985. Gogol’: Istoriya i sovremennost’: K 175-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya [Gogol, Past and Present: On the 175th Anniversary of His Birth]. Moscow: Sovietskaya Rossiya.
5. Gogol N. V. 2012. Vybrannye mesta iz perepiski s druz’yami [Chosen Excerpts from Correspondence with Friends]. Saint Petersburg.
6. Danilina G.I. 2003. “I. Bakhman i I.-V. Gyote: kompozitsiya kak tsitata” [I. Bakhman and I.-V. Goethe: Composition as a Quote]. In: Turaev S. V. (ed.). Getevskie chteniya-2003, pp. 221-237. Moscow.
7. Izer V. 1999. “Retseptivnaya estetika. Problema perevodimosti: germenevtika i sovremennoe gumanitarnoe znanie” [Receptive Aesthetics. The Problem of Translatability: Hermeneutics and Modern Humanitarian Knowledge]. Published by I. Ilyin. Akademicheskie tetrad, no 6, pp. 59-96.
8. Proceedings of the All-Russian Research Conference “Istoriya literatury: tipologiya i khudozhestvennoe vzaimodeystvie” [Literature History: Typology and Artistic Interaction]. 2016. No 20. Saint Petersburg.
9. Kuritsyn V. 2000. Russkiy literaturnyy postmodernizm [Russian Litereary Post-Modern]. Moscow.
10. Nauman M. 1978. “Vvedenie v osnovnye teoreticheskie i metodologicheskie problemy” [Introduction to the Basic Theoretical and Methodological Problems]. In: Obshchestvo. Literatura. Chtenie: Vospriyatie literatury v teoreticheskom aspekte. Translated from German. Pp. 29-83. Moscow.
11. Rodnyanskaya I. 1993. “Gipsovyj veter. O filosofskoy intoksikatsii v tekushchey slovesnosti” [Gypsum Wind. About Philosophical Intoxication in the Current Literature]. Zhurnal’nyj zal: elektronnaya biblioteka. Novyj mir, no 12. Accessed on 14.10.2016. http://magazines.russ.ru/novyi_mi/1993/12/rodnyan.html 
12. Rodnyanskaya I., Kostyrko S. 1993. “Sor iz izby. Vokrug romana Vladimira Sharova ‘Do i vo vremya’” [Dirty Linen in Public. Around Vladimir Sharov’s Novel “Before and During”]. Noviy mir, no 5.
13. Sazonova L. I. 2012. Pamyat’ kul’tury: nasledie Srednevekov’ya i barokko v russkoy literature Novogo vremeni [The Memory of Culture: The Legacy of the Middle Ages and Baroque in the Russian Literature of Modern Times]. Moscow.
14. Leyderman N. L., Lipovetskiy M. N. 2013. Sovremennaya russkaya literatura: 1959-e — 1990-e gody [Modern Russian Literature: 1959s-1990s] in 2 vols. Vol. 2. 1968-1990. Moscow: Academia.
15. Tyupa V. I. 2011. “Narrativ i drugie registry govoreniya” [Narrative and Other Speaking Registers]. Narratorium: mezhdistsiplinarnyj zhurnal, no 1-2 (Spring — Autumn). Moscow. Accessed on 23.10.2017. http://narratorium.rggu.ru/article.html?id=2027584 
16. Filatova A. I. 2005. “Sharov V.A.”. In: Skatov N. N. (ed.). Russkaya literatura XX veka. Prozaiki, poehty, dramaturgi: bio-bibl. slovar’, in 3 vols. Vol. 3. P-Ya, pp. 682-685. Moscow.
17. Khavraleva O. V. 2017. “‘Dopisyvanie klassiki’ kak vid literaturnoj retseptsii: o romane V. A Sharova ‘Vozvrashchenie v Egipet’” [“Finishing Classics” as a type of literary reception: about the novel by V.A. Sharov “Returning to Egypt”]. Proceedings of the 6th International Research Conferences for Younger Researchers “Aktual’nye voprosy filologicheskoj nauki XXI veka”. Vol. 2, pp. 110-115. Yekaterinburg: Ural’skiy federal’nyy universitet.
18. Sharov V. 2015. Vozvrashchenie v Egipet [Return to Egypt]. Moscow.
19. Shmid V. 2003. Narratologiya [Narratology]. Moscow: Yazyki slavyanskoj kul’tury.
20. Eliade M. 1998. Mif o vechnom vozvrashchenii [Myth about the Eternal Return]. Saint Petersburg.
21. Epshtejn M. N. 2016. “Drugoy Sharov” [Another Shatrov]. In: Sharov V. A. Rama vody: sbornik stikhov [Water Shape: Collection of Poems], pp. 83-84. Moscow.
22. Bal M. 1997. Narratology. Introduction to the Theory of Narrative. 2nd edition. Toronto.
23. Chatman S. B. 1986. Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film. Ithaca. London.
24. Perrie M. 2014. “Moscow in 1666: New Jerusalem, Third Rome, Third Apostasy”. Questio Rossica, no 3, pp. 75-85. Accessed on 25.10.2017 https://journals.urfu.ru/index.php/QR/article/view/062
25. Prince G. 1982. Narratology. The form and Functioning of Narrative. Berlin. DOI: 10.1515/9783110838626