Expected Features of Speech under the Influence of the Iranian-Russian Interference at the Suprasegmental Level

UT Research Journal. Humanities Research. Humanities


Release:

2018, Vol. 4. №2

Title: 
Expected Features of Speech under the Influence of the Iranian-Russian Interference at the Suprasegmental Level


For citation: Agafonova M. P. 2018. “Expected Features of Speech under the Influence of the Iranian-Russian Interference at the Suprasegmental Level”. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates, vol. 4, no 2, pp. 44-56. DOI: 10.21684/2411-197X-2018-4-2-44-56

About the author:

Marina P. Agafonova, Postgraduate Student, Department of Phonetics, Faculty of Philology, St. Petersburg State University; m.p.agafonova@yandex.ru

Abstract:

This article presents the potential features of interference in the speech of bilinguals speaking Tajik and Russian languages. The main source of phonetic interference is differences in the systems of interacting languages. Descriptions of the Tajik language phonetic system on suprasegmental level made by several researches were analyzed and a comparative analysis of the phonetic systems of Tajik and Russian languages was carried out. Among the revealed features are: stress shift on the last syllable; shorter duration of the accented syllable, higher pitch level on the stressed syllable; the influence of word stress on the melodic pattern of the language; the higher rising tone on the negative particle; the implementation of incompleteness with a higher pitch, than in Russian language; the errors of the syntagmatic division of the sentence in Russian; the absence of a number of intonation patterns and types of design of prosodic units in the speech of speakers. The objective for further research is to analyze the dynamics of the interference of different language groups on the phonetic level in speech of children and young adults.

References:

  1. Agafonova M. P. 2018. “Vzaimoobuslovlennost melodicheskogo oformleniya predcentrovoj chasti I intonacionnogo centra pri raznyh tipah intonacii nezavershennosti v spontannoj rechi i chtenii (na materiale russkogo yazyka)” [Interdependence of Melodic Design of the Center and Head with Different Types of Intonation of Incompleteness in Spontaneous Speech and Reading (Based on the Material of the Russian Language)]. Inostrannye yazyki: Lingvisticheskie i metodicheskie aspekty, vol. 38.
  2. Barannikova L. I. 1966. “Problema interferentsii i voprosy vzaimodeystviya yazykov” [Problem of Interference and Interaction of Languages]. In: Voprosy metodiki prepodavaniya inostrannykh yazykov v svyazi s problemoy yazykovoy interferentsii. Saratov.
  3. Elemeshina Yu. A. 2009. “Osobennosti fonetiko-fonologicheskoy struktury sloga (na materiale tadzhikskogo yazyka” [Features of the Phonetic and Phonological Structure of the Syllable (On the Material of the Tajik Language]. Rechevye informatsionnye tekhnologii.
  4. Ivanov V. B. 1975. Akusticheskie kharakteristiki slovesnogo udareniya v persidskom yazyke [Acoustic Characteristics of Verbal Stress in the Persian Language]. Moscow.
  5. Ivanov V. B., Semenova E. V., Khushkadamova Kh. O. 2009. Uchebnik tadzhikskogo yazyka dlya stran SNG [Tajik Language Textbook for the CIS Countries].
  6. Kuryanova I. V. 2009. Prosodicheskie korrelyaty emotsional’nykh sostoyaniy i kommunikativnykh namereniy v rechi diktorov-bilingvov [Prosodic Correlates of Emotional States and Communicative Intentions in the Speech of Bilingual Speakers]. 
  7. Mamedova A. B. 1972. Foneticheskaya priroda i mesto slovesnogo udareniya v sovremennom persidskom yazyke (v svete eksperimental’nykh dannykh) [Phonetic Nature and Place of Verbal Stress in the Modern Persian Language (In the Light of Experimental Data)]. Baku.
  8. Moroz N. Yu., Blokhina L. P. 2008. “K probleme prosodicheskoy interferentsii v usloviyakh dvuyazychiya” [Problem of Prosodic Interference in Bilingual Conditions]. Vestn. Mosk. gos. lingvist. un-ta. Vyp. 556. Ser. “Lingvistika”. Aktual’nye problemy prikladnoy i eksperimental’noy lingvistiki, pp. 178–192. Moscow: Rema.
  9. Khaskashev T. N. 1972. Foneticheskaya priroda slovesnogo udareniya v sovremennom tadzhikskom literaturnom yazyke (eksperimental’no-foneticheskoe issledovanie) [The Phonetic Nature of Word Stress in Modern Tadjik Literary Language (The Experimental Phonetic Study)]. Leninrgad.
  10. Kholnazarov D. M. 1991. “Tipologicheskoe sopostavlenie intonatsionnykh sistem tadzhikskogo i russkogo yazyka (fonologicheskiy aspekt)” [Typological Comparison of the Prosodic Systems of the Tajik and Russian Language (Phonological Aspect)]. Cand. Sci. (Philol.) diss. abstract. Dushanbe.
  11. Olson R. 1994. A Basic Course in Tajik.
  12. Sadat-Tehrani N. 2007.The Intonational Grammar of Persian. Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies of The University of Manitoba. Accessed on 4 April 2017. http://www.collectionscanada.gc.ca/obj/s4/f2/dsk3/MWU/TC-MWU-2839.pdf 
  13. Soltani M. A. 2007. Contrastive Analysis of English-Persian Intonation.