Shaping the Integral Personality of a Future Teacher

Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates


2017, Vol. 3. №2

Shaping the Integral Personality of a Future Teacher

For citation: Baboshina E. B. 2017. “Shaping the Integral Personality of a Future Teacher”. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates, vol. 3, no 2, pp. 199-212. DOI: 10.21684/2411-197X-2017-3-2-199-212

About the author:

Elena B. Baboshina, Сand. Sci. (Ped.), Associate Professor, Kurgan State University;


The culturological paradigm of education has been developing for more than a decade now (V. L. Benin, M. N. Dudina, N. B. Krylova, N. V. Nalivaiko, V. A. Slastenin, I. E. Widt, V. I. Zagvyazinsky, A. S. Zapesotsky, A. S. Zadorina, A. F. Zakirova, etc.). The aims of education have become a priority direction of research in this area. First and foremost, we consider replacing the information-knowledge approach by the axiological one.

The solution of this problem provides access to an active cultural creativity in society and overcoming technocratic processes in it. An important role in social change belongs to the teacher as the subject of such creativity because shaping a cultured individual largely depends on pedagogical education. The mechanisms and content of cultured individual development are not well defined. We believe that the solution of the problem requires some analysis of both pedagogical and cultural studies associated with the psychology of the process and its philosophy. The author shares theoretical and methodological results of her study on shaping the integral cultured individual.

The aim of the article is to show the significance of values and meanings in pedagogical education and different opportunities for shaping the integral personality of a teacher. Methodology and techniques include philosophy of education and theory of culture, theoretical research methods (logical, comparative, analytical, ascent from the abstract to the concrete). The scientific novelty of the article is the use of the analysis of shaping the integral personality of a teacher as a cultural problem of training and a study of cultural transformation process. The practical significance of the article involves a list of suggested methods for shaping the integral and cultured individual.


  1. Asmolov A. G. 2007. Psihologiya lichnosti: kul’turno-istoricheskoe ponimanie razvitiya cheloveka [Psychology of Personality: Cultural-Historical Understanding of human development]. 3rd edition, revised and extended. Moscow: Academy.
  2. Benin V. L. 2013. “Beg nosoroga (hod i ishod reformy obrazovaniya v Rossii)” [Running Rhino (The Course and Outcome of the Education Reform in Russia)]. Proceedings of the 6th All-Russian research conference “Innovative processes in education: strategy, theory and practice of development” (Yekaterinburg), vol. 2, pp. 219-221.
  3. Berdyaev N. A. 1993. “Chelovek. Microcosm i macrocosm (otryvki)” [Man. The Microcosm and the Macrocosm (Excerpts)]. Compiled by S. G. Semenova and A. G. Gacheva. In: Russky kosmizm: Antologiya filosofskoy mysli [Russian Cosmism: Anthology of Philosophical Thought], pp. 166-171. Moscow: Pedagogika-Press.
  4. Berezin F. B. Psihicheskaya adaptatsiya i trevoga [Psychic and Anxiety Adaptation].
  5. Baboshina E. B. 2014. Tsennostny podkhod k stanovleniyu cheloveka kul’tury v pedagogicheskom obrazovanii [Axiological Approach to the Formation of a Human Culture in Pedagogical Education]. Kurgan: Kurgan State University.
  6. Weber M. 1990. Kriticheskie issledovaniya v oblasti logiki nauk o kul’ture [Critical studies in the logic of cultural studies]. Translated from German; compiled, edited and afterword by Yu. N. Davydov; foreword by P. P. Gaidenko. Moscow: Progress.
  7. Gellner E. 1991. Natsii i natsionalizm [Nations and Nationalism]. Translated by M. Turkin; afterword by I. I. Krupnik. Moscow: Nauka.
  8. Goncharov S. Z. 2014. “Kul’tura — kreativnaya osnova obrazovaniya” [Culture — Creative Education]. Education and science, no 2, pp. 73-85.
  9. Deleuze G. 1998. Logika smysla [The Logic of Sense]. Translated from French. Theatrum philosophicum. Moscow: Raritet; Yekaterinburg: Delovaya kniga.
  10. Durkheim E. 1991. Tsennostnye i real’nye suzhdeniya [Value and the real judgment]. E. Durkheim // Sociological researches. No. 2. pp. 23-39.
  11. Zagvyazinsky V. I. 2015. “Lichnost’ pedagoga i perspektivy razvitiya otechestvennogo obrazovaniya” [The Teacher and the Prospects for the Development of National Education]. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates, vol. 1, no 1(1), pp. 145-153.
  12. Zakirova A. F., Buyko N. S. 2008. Germenevtika pedagogicheskogo teksta: teoriya i praktika [Hermeneutic Pedagogical Text: Theory and Practice]. Tyumen: Tyumen State University Publishing House.
  13. Zakirova A. F. 2011. Vkhodya v germenevtichesky krug. Kontseptsiya pedagogicheskoj germenevtiki [Entering the Hermeneutic Circle. The Concept of Pedagogical Hermeneutics]. Moscow: VLADOS.
  14. Zinchenko V. P. 2000. “Rassudok i razum v kontekste razvivayuschegosya obrazovaniya” [The Mind and the Mind in the Context of Developing Education]. Man, no 5, pp. 20-36.
  15. Kogan L. N. 1993. Teoriya kul’tury: uchebnoe posobie [The Theory of Culture: Study Guide]. Yekaterinburg: Ural State University.
  16. Kuvakin V. 2002. “Sovremenny gumanizm” [Modern Humanism]. Higher education in Russia, no.4, pp. 41-54.
  17. Kutyrev V. A. 2001. “Chelovek ХХI veka: uhodyaschaya natura” [Man of the XXI Century: Leaving Nature]. Man, no. 1, pp. 9-17.
  18. Tulchinsky G. L. 1990. Razum, volya, uspeh: o philosophii postupka [Mind, Will, Success: On the Philosophy of the Act]. Leningrad: Leningrad State University.
  19. Phillipov A. F. Tsennost’ universitetskogo obrazovaniya [The Value of University Education].
  20. Heidegger M. 1993. Vremya i bytiyo: statji i vystupleniya [Time and Being: Articles and Speeches]. Translated from German. Moscow: Respublika.
  21. Yudin B. G. Kontseptsiya chelovecheskogo potentsiala [The Concept of Human Potential].