The Political Situation in the Urals after the Departure of Kolchak’s Army in 1919

Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates


Release:

2017, Vol. 3. №2

Title: 
The Political Situation in the Urals after the Departure of Kolchak’s Army in 1919


For citation: Moskovkin V. V., Skipina I. V. 2017. “The Political Situation in the Urals after the Departure of Kolchak’s Army in 1919”. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates, vol. 3, no 2, pp. 150-160. DOI: 10.21684/2411-197X-2017-3-2-150-160

About the authors:

Vladimir V. Moskovkin, Dr. Sci. (Hist.), Professor, National History Department, Institute of History and Political Science, Tyumen State University; mock1916@yandex.ru

Irina V. Skipina, Dr. Sci. (Hist.), Acting Head of the Department of Documentation and records management, Institute of History and Political Science, Tyumen State University; i.skipina@mail.ru

Abstract:

The purpose of this article is to describe on the basis of the known and the newly introduced scientific evidence the political situation in Tyumen and in Tobolsk Province in general after Kolchak’s departure in August 1919.

The documents show that the majority of the population on both sides of the conflict both in the city and in the country, tired of the war hardships, accepted with a great enthusiasm the stabilization took place after the cessation of hostilities and withdrawal of the White. Enlistment events of the autumn 1919 demonstrated the exhaustion of not only economic resources, but manpower as well. In autumn 1919, in the Ural Military District the authorities planned to raise about 400 thousand people, but the job was not done. 232.4 thousand soldiers joined the Red Army, of which more than 3 thousand soon deserted. A similar situation was in the enemy’s ranks. Kolchak had no chance to gain a foothold in the region, and the White could not hope for continued success. In most cases, the province’s residents showed a neutral attitude to the political realities, reluctant to participate in fighting on anyone’s side and hoping for quick stabilization of the situation and peace. The homefront appeared unable to support the army both in economic, social and political terms. Mobilization attempts encountered not only the reluctance of men to serve in the army, but also the fact that by the autumn of 1919 young people of the age either had already been mobilized, or, for different reasons, were not subject for joining the army.

As a result, despite the heterogeneity of the political position, the desire of the population for peace outweighed, and the citizens had to accept the Red, who in the decisive battle showed that they were stronger than the White regime.

References:

  1. Aminev Z. A. 1966. Oktyabr’skaya sotsialisticheskaya revolyutsiya i grazhdanskaya vojna v Bashkirii [October Socialist Revolution and the Civil War in Bashkortostan]. Ufa: Bashkirskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo.
  2. Buzunov V. E. 1957. Razgrom inostrannoy voennoy interventsii i kolchakovschiny na Urale [The Defeat of Foreign Military Intervention and Kolchak in the Urals], pp. 5-42. Sverdlovsk: Sverdlovskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo.
  3. Vereschagin A. S. 2012. Novye aspekty regional’noy istoriographii grazhdanskoy voyny [New Aspects of the Regional Civil War Historiography], pp. 44-46.
  4. Gosudarstvennyy arhiv Rossiyskoy Federatsii [The State Archives of the Russian Federation]. F. 353. L. 3. D. 131. Sh. 2.
  5. GBOTO “Gosudarstvenny arkhiv Tyumenskoy oblasti” (GBOTO GATO) [The State Archives of the Tyumen region]. F. 1. L. 1. D. 93. Sh. 4; D. 124. Sh. 7; F. 2. L .1. D. 83. Sh. 4-7; D. 84. Sh. 18.
  6. GKU “Gosudarstvenny arkhiv obschestvenno-politicheskoy dokumentatsii Kurskoy oblasti” (GKU GAOPDKO) [The State Archives of Socio-Political Documentation in the Kursk Region]. F. 1. L. 1. D. 9a. Sh. 3; D. 65. Sh. 17-18.
  7. GKU SO “Gosudarstvenny arhiv Sverdlovskoy oblasti” (GKU SO GASO) [The State Archives of the Sverdlovsk Region]. F. 511. L. 1. D. 156. Sh. 31; F. 1777. L. 1. D. 1. Sh. 7.
  8. Gosudarstvenny arkhiv sotsial’no-politicheskoy istorii Tyumenskoy oblasti (GASPITO) [The State Archives of Social and Political History of the Tyumen region]. F. 1. L. 1. D. 354. Sh. 56-56.
  9. Vaskovskii O. A. 1969. Grazhdanskaya voyna i inostrannaya interventsiya na Urale [The Civil War and Foreign Intervention in the Urals]. Sverdlovsk: Sred.-Ural. knizhnoe izdatel’stvo.
  10. GU “Ob’’edinyonny gosudarstvenny arkhiv Chelyabinskoy oblasti” (GU USACR) [The United State Archives of the Chelyabinsk Region]. F. 363. L. 1. D. 29. Sh. 5, 8.
  11. Kobzov V. S., Sicinski E. P. 1997. Gosudarstvennoe stroitel’stvo na Urale v 1917-1921 [State-Building in the Urals in 1917-1921]. Chelyabinsk: Chelyabinsky yuridichesky institut MVDRF.
  12. Konkin A. A. 2015. Sovremennaya istoriographiya vnutrenney politiki bol’shevikov (1918-1920) [Modern historiography of the internal policy of the Bol’sheviks (1918-1920)], pp. 120-128.
  13. Igritsky Yu. I. (ed.). 2010. Kontseptsii i otsenki razvitiya Rossii (XX — nachalo XXI v.) v zarubezhnykh issledovaniyakh [Concept and Evaluation Development of Russia (XX — the beginning XXI century) in Foreign Studies]. Moscow: RAN. INION.
  14. Kuryshev I. V. 2016. Povsednevnaya zhizn’ zapadnosibirskoy derevni v gody grazhdanskoy voyny [The Daily Life of the West Siberian Village during the Civil War], pp. 121-127.
  15. Moskovkin V. V., Skipina I. V. 2015. O vliyanii sotsial’noy pozitsii krest’yanstva na frontovuyu obstanovku vesnoy-letom 1919 goda [About the Influence of the Social Position of the Peasantry on the Front-Line Situation in the Spring-Summer 1919], pp. 32-36.
  16. Sverdlovskoe knizhnoe izdatelstvo. 1971. Ocherki istorii kommunisticheskikh organizatsiy Urala [Essays on the History of the Communist Organizations of the Urals]. Sverdlovsk: Sverdlovskoe knizhnoe izdatel’stvo.
  17. Permsky gosudarstvenny arkhiv noveyshey istorii (PermGANI) [The Perm State Archives of Contemporary History]. F. 557. L. 1. D. 10. Sh. 83, 112; D. 520. Sh. 143.
  18. Upravlenie delami SovRanKoma SSSR. 1943. “Postanovlenie Soveta rabochej i krest’yanskoj oborony ‘O merah po iskoreneniyu dezertirstva’” [The Resolution of Council of Workers and Peasants’ Defense “On the MAARS to Eliminate Desertion] no 287. In: Sobranie uzakoneny I rasporyazheny pravitelstva za 1919 g., pp. 417-419. Moscow: Upravlenie delami SovRanKoma SSSR.
  19. Rossiysky gosudarstvenny voenny arkhiv (RGVA) [The Russian State Military Archives]. F. 11. L. 8. D. 520. Sh. 48, 49; D. 943. Sh. 81, 330-330 back page; 944. Sh. 59, 65.
  20. Roschevsky P. I. 1959. Razlozhenie kolchakovskoy armii nakanune eyo razgroma [Decomposition of Kolchak’s Army on the Eve of Its Defeat (The 40th Anniversary of the Liberation of Siberia from the White Guards and Foreign Military Interventionists)], pp. 58-59.
  21. Skipin D. L., Skipina I. V. 2001. “Khleb nasuschny” kak zhiznennaya tsennost’ rossiyskogo krest’yanstva [“Daily Bread” as the Value of Life of the Russian Peasantry], pp. 43-49. Ishim: IGPI.
  22. Tormozov V. T., Pismensky G. I., Pismensky A. G. 2013. Vvedenie v istoriographiyu belogo dvizheniya. Grazhdanskaya voyna i beloe dvizhenie: voprosy natsional’noy i sotsial’noy politiki [Introduction to the Historiography of the White Movement. The Civil War and the White Movement: Issues of National and Social Policy]. Moscow: IZD. SGU.