The Mechanisms of Evaluation in Column Articles by A. G. Baunov

Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates


Release:

2017, Vol. 3. №1

Title: 
The Mechanisms of Evaluation in Column Articles by A. G. Baunov


For citation: Markova V. V., Petrova O. A. 2017. “The Mechanisms of Evaluation in Column Articles by A. G. Baunov”. Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates, vol. 3, no 1, pp. 44-56. DOI: 10.21684/2411-197X-2017-3-1-44-56

About the authors:

Viktoriya V. Markova, Cand. Sci. (Philol.), Associate Professor, Journalism Department, Tyumen State University; vitmark14@yandex.ru

Olga A. Petrova, Cand. Sci. (Philol.), Associate Professor, Journalism Department, Tyumen State University; petrova-o-a@yandex.ru

Abstract:

This article deals with the characteristic features of evaluation in the columns of A. G. Baunov, published on slon.ru. The article is devoted to the embodiment of evaluation at the levels of a text macrostructure and microstructure. Iconic metaphorical and contextual elements serve as the means to express evaluation. Baunov’s evaluation is a powerful speech factor to convey impact on the audience, to form public opinion and values. In this regard, Baunov’s texts perform, apart from the informative function, the culture-shaping function. Baunov’s publicist works contain a formula for one of the most significant problems of the contemporary community — the spread of “the language of hatred” in the world, imposing it on the society through the media, alongside the loss of humanistic ideals in favor of political intrigue. The author presents this problem through a conflict between two “types of statements”: the first “suggests that there is nobody around”, and the second “suggests that there are others”.

References:

  1. Arutyunova N. D. 1988. Tipy yazykovyh znacheniy: Otsenka. Sobytie. Fakt [Types of Linguistic Meanings: Assessment. Event. Fact]. Moscow. 
  2. Chernyshova T. V. “Negativnaya ocenochnost'” kak faktor konfliktnosti publicisticheskogo teksta [“The Negative Evaluation” as a Factor of Conflict in a Publicist Text]. http://siberia-expert.com/publ/negativnaja_ocenochnost_kak_faktor_konfliktnosti_publicisticheskogo_t....
  3. Dobrosklonskaya T. G. 2008. Medialingvistika: sistemnyj podhod k izucheniju jazyka SMI [Medialingvistics: A Systematic Approach to the Study of Language Media]. Moscow. 
  4. Kajda L. G. 2008. “Poziciya avtora v publitsistike. Stilisticheskaya koncepciya” [The Position of the Author in Journalism. Stylistic Concept]. In: Solganik G. Ya. (comp.). 2008. Yazyk sovremennoy publitsistiki. Moscow.
  5. Klushina N. I. 2008. Stilistika publicisticheskogo teksta [Stylistics of a Publicist Text]. Moscow.
  6. Markelova T. V. 1993. Semantika ocenki i sredstva ee vyrazhenija v russkom jazyke [The Evaluation Semantics and the Means of its Expression in the Russian Language]. Moscow. 
  7. Smetanina S. I. 2002. Media-tekst v sisteme kul'tury (dinamicheskie processy v yazyke i stile zhurnalistiki kontsa XX veka) [Media Text in the System of Culture (Dynamic Processes in the Language and Style of the Late XX Century Journalism)]. St. Petersburg. 
  8. Solganik G. Ya. 2010. Osnovy lingvistiki rechi [Fundamentals of Speech Linguistic]. Moscow. 
  9. Valgina N. S. 2003. Teoriya teksta [The Text Theory]. Moscow. 
  10. Wolf E. M. 2002. Funkcional'naya semantika otsenki [Functional Evaluation Semantics]. Moscow.