Politics of France and Germany Towards the International Criminal Justice Institutions in the Late XX — Early XXI Century

Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates


Release:

2016, Vol. 2. №4

Title: 
Politics of France and Germany Towards the International Criminal Justice Institutions in the Late XX — Early XXI Century


About the authors:

Nadezhda V. Dubiv, Cand. Sci. (Ped.), Associate Professor, Foreign Languages Department, Deputy Dean, Institute of History and Political Science, Tyumen State University; nadjamich@mail.ru

Galina A. Nelaeva, Cand. Sci. (Polit.), Associate Professor, Department of Modern History and International Relations, Institute of History and Political Science, Tyumen State University; nelaeva@yahoo.com

Abstract:

The end of the Cold War saw the creation of new institutions of international criminal justice: international tribunals established within the auspices of the United Nations, which continued the tradition laid out in the WWII Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals. The purpose of the article is to examine positions of European countries, in particular, France and Germany in relation to the international criminal justice institutions, such as the ICTY and the International Criminal Court in the 1990s — early 2000s. These countries were chosen as examples since both of them supported the creation and activities of the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia (ICTY) at the very start of its work and at a later stage. Positions of these two states were crucial in establishing the International Criminal Court (France and Germany were among the first states to sign and ratify the Rome Statute of the ICC). The results of the study can be the following: positions of France and Germany should be examined through constructivist view of international relations, according to which states commit to promote norms in order to demonstrate their belonging to the “legitimate” international society members and their readiness to protect and promote human rights ideals in their foreign policy. The article concludes that the international community will continue to resort to the creation of such institutions and the positions of Germany and France will remain the same: they will continue to promote the idea of international criminal justice in their foreign policy.

References:

  1. Armatta J. 2010. Twilight of Impunity: the War Crimes Trial of Slobodan Milosevic. Durham: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391791
  2. Cassese A. 2006.The Path to the Hague. Selected Documents on the Origins of the ICTY. The Hague.
  3. Cendrowicz L. 2011. “After Mladic’s Arrest, the E.U. Whispers Sweet Nothings to Serbia”. Time, May 28. http://content.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2074595,00.html
  4. Conclusions of the General Affairs Council of 9 November 1998. http://www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/gena/09008.EN9.htm
  5. Der Spiegel. 1994. “Symbol des Terrors”. Der Spiegel, November 7, 1994. http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-13684528.html
  6. Dérens J-A, Geslin L. 2011. “Comment la DGSE a protégé Ante Gotovina”. La Libre, March 9. http://www.lalibre.be/actu/international/comment-la-dgse-a-protege-ante-gotovina-51b8cf3fe4b0de6db9c...
  7. Dérens J-A. 2005. “TPIY: le général croate fugitif Ante Gotovina est un citoyen français”. Le Monde Diplomatique, March 1. http://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/dossiers/gotovina
  8. Deutsche Welle. 2013. “EU warms to Serbia, Kosovo”. Deutsche Welle, June 25. http://www.dw.de/eu-warms-to-serbia-kosovo/a-16907996
  9. Ernst A. 2013. “Kurswechsel des Uno-Tribunals”. Neue Zuger Zeitung, June 20. http://www.nzz.ch/aktuell/international/uebersicht/kurswechsel-des-uno-tribunals-1.18102045
  10. Fehl C. 2004. “Explaining the International Criminal Court: A ‘Practice Test’ for Rationalist and Constructivist Approaches”. European Journal of International Relations, vol. 3, no 10, pp. 357-394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066104045541
  11. Hazan P. 2004. Justice in the Time of War: the True Story Behind the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
  12. Hervig V. M. 2014. “Der Angeklagte steuert das Jugoslawien-Tribunal”. Deutschlandradiokultur, June 2. http://www.deutschlandradiokultur.de/justiz-der-angeklagte-steuert-das-jugoslawien-tribunal.1005.de....
  13. Hirondelle News Agency. 2011. “TPIY/France- un Mandat d’arret Contre L’ancienne Porte-Parole de Carla Del Ponte”. Hirondelle News Agency, November 17. http://www.hirondellenews.com/fr/autres-juridictions/202-tpiy/16960-171111-tpiyfrance-un-mandat-darr...
  14. ICTY Second Annual Report. A/50/365, S/1995/728, 23 August 1995. http://www.icty.org/x/file/About/Reports%20and%20Publications/AnnualReports/annual_report_1995_en.pd...
  15. InSerbia News. 2013. “Russian Ambassador Churkin: ICTY Is Negative Example”. InSerbia News, April 10. http://inserbia.info/today/2013/04/russian-ambassador-churkin-icty-is-negative-example
  16. Junge UN-Forschung. 2013. “Das Völkerstrafrecht ist aus der Weltpolitik nicht mehr wegzudenken — Interview mit Richter Christoph Flügge”. Junge UN-Forschung, November 29. https://jungeunforschung.wordpress.com/tag/jugoslawientribunal
  17. Kratovac K. 2014. “Drohungen gegen Tadic nach Karadzic-Festnahme”. Epoch Times, August 27. http://www.epochtimes.de/Drohungen-gegen-Tadic-nach-Karadzic-Festnahme-a317534.html
  18. La gouvernance démocratique et les droits de l’homme. Ministère des Affaires étrangères et européennes Direction générale de la mondialisation, du développement et des partenariats. 2010. www.diplomatie.gouv.fr
  19. Law on Cooperation with the International Tribunal in respect of the Former Yugoslavia (Law on the International Yugoslavia Tribunal). April 10, 1995. http://www.icty.org/x/file/Legal%20Library/Member_States_Cooperation/implementation_legislation_germ...
  20. Le Monde. 2011. “La France ne remettra pas Florence Hartmann au TPIY”. Le Monde, December 26. http://www.lemonde.fr/europe/article/2011/12/26/la-france-n-arretera-pas-florence-hartmann_1622835_3...
  21. Liberation. 2012. “Carla del Ponte «choquée» par l’acquittement des généraux croates”. Liberation, November 20. http://www.liberation.fr/monde/2012/11/20/carla-del-ponte-choquee-l-acquittement-des-generaux-croate...
  22. Loi n° 95-1 du 2 janvier 1995 portant adaptation de la législation française aux dispositions de la résolution 827 du Conseil de sécurité des Nations Unies instituant un tribunal international en vue de juger les personnes présumées responsables de violations graves du droit international humanitaire commises sur le territoire de l’ex-Yougoslavie depuis 1991 (1). http://legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexteArticle.do;jsessionid=1F68159DA8C6C41151FFFE2E1569A97D.tpdjo02v... 
  23. Marochkin S. Y., Nelaeva G. A. 2013. “Law-Making Capacity of International Tribunals (In the International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia Jurisprudence)”. Tyumen State University Herald (Law), no 3, pp. 116-122.
  24. Rettman A. 2013. “Germany sides with Kosovo against Serbia”. EU Observer, April 17. http://euobserver.com/enlargement/119833
  25. Ristic M. 2012. “Russia, Serbia Criticise the ICTY before the UN”. In: Balkan Insight. December 6. http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/cooperation-with-ex-yugoslav-countries-crucial-icty-says#sth...
  26. Security Council: ICTY and ICTR. Statement by Mr. Jean-Pierre Lacroix, Deputy Permanent Representative of France to the United Nations. June 4, 2009. http://www.franceonu.org/france-at-the-united-nations/press-room/statements-at-open-meetings/securit...
  27. Security Council: Statement by Ambassador Berger on Kosovo on November 27, 2012. The Permanent Mission of Germany to the United Nations. http://www.new-york-un.diplo.de/Vertretung/newyorkvn/en/__pr/speeches-statements/2012/20121127-berge...
  28. Spiegel. 2006. “Ante Gotovina: US Links to Croatian War Crime?”. Spiegel International, January 23. http://www.spiegel.de/international/ante-gotovina-us-links-to-croatian-war-crime-a-396828.html
  29. Statement by Mr. Alexis Lamek, Deputy Permanent Representative of France to the United Nations. Debate on the International Criminal Tribunal for former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and for Rwanda (ICTR). Security Council on June 5, 2014. Permanent Mission of France to the United Nations in New York. http://www.franceonu.org/france-at-the-united-nations/press-room/statements-at-open-meetings/securit...
  30. Statement by Mr. Gérard Araud, Permanent Representative of France to the United Nations, on October 17, 2012. Security Council — The promotion and strengthening of the rule of law in the maintenance of international peace and security. http://www.franceonu.org/france-at-the-united-nations/press-room/statements-at-open-meetings/securit...
  31. Statement delivered by Minister Plenipotentiary Eick on ICTY and ICTR on December 7, 2011. The Permanent Mission of Germany to the United Nations. http://www.new-york-un.diplo.de/Vertretung/newyorkvn/en/__pr/speeches-statements/2011/20111207-Witti...
  32. Stojanovic J. 2009. “EU Political Conditionality and Domestic Politics: Cooperation with the International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia in Croatia and Serbia”. PhD Thesis. Central European University.
  33. Tavernier P. 1997. “L’expérience des Tribunaux pénaux internationaux pour l’ex-Yougoslavie et pour le Rwanda”. Revue internationale de la Croix-Rouge, December 31, no 828. https://www.icrc.org/fre/resources/documents/misc/57jnyy.html
  34. Wurst X. 2008. “Ein wichtiger Schritt Serbiens nach Europa”. Zeit Online, August 30. http://www.zeit.de/online/2008/30/radovan-karadzic-interview-joschka-fischer