Motif-Thematic Complex “Initiation” in the Works About the First and the Second World Wars

Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates


Release:

2016, Vol. 2. №2

Title: 
Motif-Thematic Complex “Initiation” in the Works About the First and the Second World Wars


About the author:

Oleg E. Pokhalenkov, Cand. Sci. (Philol.), Associate Professor, Department of the English Language and Interpreting, Smolensk State University; olegpokhalenkov@rambler.ru

Abstract:

The article considers the motif-thematic complex of “initiation” in the works of famous writers of the First World War period (German — Erich Maria Remarque, English — Richard Aldington, American — Ernest Hemingway) and Viktor Nekrasov (representative of the Russian prose of the Second World War). As the result of the comparative studies a set of motifs (death, frontline friendship etc.) that corresponds to the second stage of “initiation” of a literary character (“front every day life”) is identified; the author also presents a nuclear peripheral motif model where the movement of motifs from the nucleus to the peripheral zone demonstrates the importance of a particular event at the level of the plot of the works. The motif-thematic model is analyzed at the stage of “front weekdays” of the initiation (including the following levels of the text: composition, figurative, motif and thematic).

References:

  1. Aldington R. Death of a Hero. http://lib.ru/INPROZ/ALDINGTON/front.txt.
  2. Arnold H. L. 1999. “Erich Maria Remarque und Ernst Jünger. Zwei deutsche Wege durch das 20. Jahrhundert”. In: Erich Maria Remarque Jahrbuch [Yearbook IX], ss. 5-17.
  3. Bachteler F. 1979. “Zur Frage der Remarquismus in sowjetischen Kriegsromanen nach 1945”. In: Nowikowa I. (Ed.). 1979. Rezeption westeuropäscher Autoren in der Sowjetunion. Auswahlkriterien ud Kritik, vol. 2, ss. 9-39. Hamburg: BUSKE (Hamburger Beiträge für Russischlehrer 15).
  4. Hemingway E. Farewell to Arms. http://e-libra.ru/read/103672-a-farewell-to-arms.html
  5. Klein H. 1993. “Transcendent Visions of Renewal in First World War Literature.” In: Krieg and Literatur / War and Literature, vol. 5, no 9, pp. 7-17.
  6. Knibb J. 1990. “Literary strategies of war, strategies of literary war.” In: Bevan D. (Ed.). 1990. Literature and War, pp. 7-25. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
  7. Nekrasov V. P. 1989. V okopah Stalingrada: Povest, rasskazy [In the Trenches of Stalingrad: Novels, Short Stories]. Moscow: Pravda.
  8. Nekrassow V. 1992. “Vierzig Jahre danach”. In: Stalingrad. Mit dem Nachwort des Autors zur russischen Ausgabe 1981 im Possev-Verlag, Frankfurt am Main. Aus dem Russchen von Alfred Frank. Berlin: FAB.
  9. Pokhalenkov O. Ye. 2014. “Motivnaya struktura romana E. M. Remarka ‘Vozvrashhenie’” [Motivic Structure of E. M. Remarque’s Novel “The Return”]. Vestnik Leningradskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni A. S. Pushkina, vol. 1, no 2, pp. 93-102.
  10. Pokhalenkov O. Ye. 2014. “Sravnitelno-sopostavitelnyy analiz motivnoy struktury romana E. M. Remarka ‘Vozvrashhenie’ i povesti V. Nekrasova ‘V rodnom gorode’ [Comparative Analysis of Motivic Structure of E. M. Remarque’s Novel “The Return” and a Story by V. Nekrasov “In the hometown”]. Izvestiya Sochinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no 4-2(33), pp. 45-50.
  11. Remarque E. M. 1999. Im Westen nichts Neues. Mit Materialen und einem Nachwort von Tilman Westphalen. Köln: KiWi.
  12. Rutherford A. 1989. The literature of war: studies in heroic virtue. 2nd rev. edn. London: The Macmillan Press LTD. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-19659-3
  13. Silantyev I. V. 2002. “Motiv kak problema narratologii” [The Motif as a Problem of Narratology]. Kritika i semiotika, vol. 5, pp. 32-60.