Characterological approach in the tуpological linguistic studies of the XX century

UT Research Journal. Humanities Research. Humanities


2016, Vol. 2. №1

Characterological approach in the tуpological linguistic studies of the XX century

About the author:

Natalia B. Popova, Dr. Sci. (Philol.), Professor, Roman and German Languages Department, Cheliabinsk State University;


The article deals with the new for the XX century linguistics approaches of typological research of languages, different from the genetic approach of the XIX century linguistics known as a comparative historical method. In fact, the typological linguistics was founded in the network of the comparative historical method. It is necessary to note that comparative researchers, constructing the morphological typology in the network of the comparative historical method in linguistics, rely on the historical process of languages formation at the initial phase of their study. 
Fridrich Shlegel in his work “On the Language and Wisdom of Indians” (1809) suggested dividing all the world languages into two types: inflexional and affixational languages. His brother August Shlegel in the work “Notes on Provençal language in literature” (1818) revised morphological (typological) classification of his brother and then suggested three types of languages: inflexional, affixational, and amorphous languages. It is necessary to note that August Shlegel also indicated two facilities of language grammatical structures: a synthetic and an analytic facilities. W. von Humboldt in his work of 1837 “On the Difference of Human Language Organisms and on the Influence of its Difference on the Mental Development of Humanity” adds and describes the forth type — the incorporating languages (e. g., American Indian languages and Paleo-Asiatic languages).
In the linguistics of XX century the development of typological tendency regards logical revision now existing typological categories and the search of the characterological features of different languages at all linguistic levels: phonetic, morphological, lexical, stylistic. It is no coincidence, because the XX century — as a century of structuralism in European linguistics and descriptive linguistics in America — is characterized by a more deterministic character of the typological studies of the language system and structure. Instead of classifications, scientists of XX century prefer to make lists of typological significant features of comparing languages. That is only the essence of the characterological approach in the typological linguistics of XX century.


  1. Amirova, T. A., B. A. Olchovikov and U. V. Rozhdestvenskiy. 2003. Istoria iazikoznania: uchebnoe possobie dla studentov vischich uchebnich zavedeniy [History of Linguistics: a Textbook for University Students]. Edited by S. F. Goncharenko. Moscow: Academia.
  2. Berezin, F. M. and B. N. Golovin. 2014. Obschee iazikoznanie: Uchebnoe possobie dla studentov ped.vuzov [General Linguistics: A Manual for the Students of Teacher-Training Institutions]. Moscow: Alyance. 
  3. Danilenko, V. P. 1986. “Linguisticheskaia characterologuia v kontseptsii V. Mateziussa” [Linguistic Characterology in the Concept of V. I. Mathesius]. Voprossi iazikoznania [Problems of Linguistics], no. 4.
  4. Finck, F. N. 1910. Die Haupttypen des Sprachbaues. Leipzig.
  5. Humboldt, W. 1984. Izbrannie trudi po iazikoznaniu [Selected Works on Linguistics]. Moscow.
  6. Isachenko, A. 1963. “Opit typologichescogo analisa slavianskich iazikov” [The Experience of Typological Analysis of Slavic Languages]. Novoe v linguistike [New Issues in Linguistics], no. 3. Moscow
  7. Levitskiy, Yu. A. and N. V. Borannikova. 2005. Istoria linguisticheskich ucheniy: Uchebnoe possobie [History of Linguistic Studies: a Tutorial]. Moscow: Vischaya schkola.
  8. Mathesius, V. 1982. “О jazykove spravnosti” [On Correct Language]. Jazyk, kultura a slovesnost [Language, Culture and Literature], pp. 60-64. Prague.
  9. Sepir, E. 1993. Izbrannie trudi po iazikoznaniyu i kulturologuii [Selected Works on Linguistics and Culture Studies]. Moscow.
  10. Trubetskoi, N. S. (1937) 1958. “Misli ob indoevropeiskoy problem” [Thoughts on the Indo-European Problem]. Voprossi iazikoznania [Problems of Linguistics], no. 1.