Figure and Image in Antagonism between the Figurative and Expressive

Tyumen State University Herald. Humanities Research. Humanitates


Release:

Vesntik TSU. Philosophy. 2013

Title: 
Figure and Image in Antagonism between the Figurative and Expressive


About the authors:

Irina N. Pupysheva,
Mikhail N. Shcherbinin,
Dr. Philos. Sci., Professor, Department of Philosophy, Institute for the Humanities, Tyumen State University

Abstract:

Category of a “figure” is explored in the paper from the point of view
of its aesthetic capabilities. This kind of method makes assertions about a figure as
a particular type of an image. At that the boarders of the figure, figurative, and “figural”
go further the limits of sculptural embodiment and image of pictorial art. Literary
image is reviewed in respect of its “figural” capabilities. Correlation of the literal and
figurative is conducted against the background of logic and aesthetic-anthropological
rules of sense formation. It is underlined that the aesthetic is not simply opposed
to logic. Dialectics of literal and figurative is represented as one of the main factors of
development of literature, which is detected in opposition of trends, genres and styles of
literature. “Figural” capacities of the image are portrayed as existing as in a figurative
as in a literal utterance. Figural character of the image is reviews by an example of
the fabular plot “The Crow and the Fox”. The fabular texts of J. La Fontaine and
I.A. Krylov are compared; an analogy to cultural, historic, and mental particularities
of deceit perception is drawn.

References:

1. Shherbinin, M.N. Figural character of Sociality: Aesthetic-anthropologic Search. Vestnik
Tjumenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta — Tyumen State University Herald. 2011.
№ 10. Series «Philosophy». Pp. 6–15. (in Russian).
2. Shilkov, Ju.M. On Functional Discourse Nature // «Ja. (A. Slinin) i My». Sb. statej
[«I (А. Slinin and We»: Collected papers]. URL: anthropology.ru/ru/texts/shilkov/slinin.
html
3. Man'kovskaja, N. Jestetika postmodernizma [Aesthetics of Postmodernism].
St-Petersburg, 2000. 347 p. (in Russian).
4. Skoropanova, I.S. Russkaja postmodernistskaja literatura: novaja filosofija, novyj
jazyk [Russian Postmodern Literature: New Philosophy, New Language]. St-Petersburg,
2001. 416 p. (in Russian).
5. Lessing, G.Je. Laocoon and The Boarders of Painting and // Lessing G.Je. Izbrannye
proizvedenija [Selected works]. Мoscow, 1953. Pp. 385–516. (in Russian).
6. Potebnja, A.A. Teoreticheskaja pojetika [Theoretical Poetics]. Мoscow, 1990. 344 p.
(in Russian).
7. Potebnja, A.A. Jestetika i pojetika [Aesthetics and Poetics]. Мoscow, 1976. 614 p.
(in Russian).
8. Vygotskij, L.S. Psihologija iskusstva [Psychology of Art]. Мoscow, 1968. 575 p.
(in Russian).
9. Krjuchkov, V.P. Psychological Theory of L.S. Vygotskiy’s Fable and its Resources //
Masterstvo i tvorchestvo sub,,ektov obrazovanija: teorija i praktika: Sb. nauch. tr.
[Excellence and Creative works of Members of Education: Theory and Practice: Collected
papers]. Saratov, 2010. Pp. 61–67. (in Russian).
10. Jejdel'man, T.N. Basnja [The Fable]. URL: www.krugosvet.ru