Study of the Efficiency of Methods for Enhanced Condensate Recovery, Based on Reservoir Simulation Models

Tyumen State University Herald. Physical and Mathematical Modeling. Oil, Gas, Energy


Release:

2017, Vol. 3. №1

Title: 
Study of the Efficiency of Methods for Enhanced Condensate Recovery, Based on Reservoir Simulation Models


For citation: Makarov E. S., Yushkov A. Y., Romanov A. S. 2017. “Study of the Efficiency of Methods for Enhanced Condensate Recovery, Based on Reservoir Simulation Models”. Tyumen State University Herald. Physical and Mathematical Modeling. Oil, Gas, Energy, vol. 3, no 1, pp. 79-90. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7978-2017-3-1-79-90

About the authors:

Evgeny S. Makarov, Postgraduate Student, Institute of Physics and Technology, Tyumen State University; Head Specialist, LLC “Tyumen Petroleum Research Centre”; esmakarov2@rosneft.ru

Anton Y. Yushkov, Cand. Sci. (Tech.), Associate Professor, Department of Development and Operation of Oil and Gas Fields, Tyumen Industrial University; General Manager, Tyumen Petroleum Research Center; ayyushkov@tnnc.rosneft.ru; ORCID: 0000-0002-6160-0689

Alexander S. Romanov, Cand. Sci. (Tech.), Team Leader, LLC “Tyumen Petroleum Research Centre”; asromanov@rosneft.ru

Abstract:

The purpose of this work is to assess the technological effectiveness of methods for increasing the condensate recovery from the Achim deposits of the Urengoy oil and gas condensate field (geological horizon Ach52-3, the East-Urengoy License Area). The distinctive features of the Achim deposits are low permeability (of the order of 1 mD) and anomalously high initial reservoir pressure (≈ 600 atm).

Technological calculations were performed using the composite hydrodynamic model implemented in the ECLIPSE 300 format. For the modeling of the methods of increasing the condensate recovery the authors selected the development element at one of the sections of the Ach52-3 reservoir in which the average parameters corresponded to the parameters of the full-scale model. Evaluation of the effectiveness of various methods was performed by comparing the selected methods with the baseline scenario, which represents the traditional scheme for the development of the gas deposit — depletion. As alternative scenarios of the development, the methods for sustaining reservoir pressure by injecting various agents into the reservoir were considered: dry gas ("cycling"), nitrogen, water, mixed effects of gas and water (water and gas impact). In addition, the optimal ratio of injection and production wells, the amount of injection compensation, and the rate of gas extraction were selected.

Using the simplified economic model the economic efficiency of various development scenarios was evaluated. The principle of the variants ranking was the integral parameter, which includes accounting both technological (gas / condensate extraction coefficients) and economic indicators (net discounted profit, discounted state profit).

The results of performed studies for increasing the condensate recovery from reservoirs show the effectiveness of the use of non-traditional technologies for the development of gas condensate deposits. This is achieved primarily by a relative increase in condensate recovery by 40-50% compared with the baseline scenario.

References:

  1. Brusilovskii A. I. 2002. Fazovye prevrashcheniia pri razrabotke nefti a gaza [Phase transitions at oil and gas development]. Moscow: Graal'.
  2. Lyutomskiy S. M., Miskevich V. E., Yushkov I. Yu., Lapteva S. V., Lepina N. V. 2006. “Otsenka vozmozhnosti primeneniya saykling protsessa pri razrabotke achimovskikh zalezhey” [Assessment of the Possibility of Cycling Process Using at the Development of Achimov Deposits]. Gas Industry of Russia, no 7, pp. 24-26.
  3. Ter-Sarkisov R. M., Gritsenko A. I., Shandrygin A. N. 1996. Razrabotka gazokondensatnykh mestorozhdeniem s vozdeystviem na plast [Development of the Gas-Condensate Fields with an Impact on the Reservoir]. Moscow: Nedra.
  4. Ter-Sarkisov R. M. 1999. Razrabotka mestorozhdeniy prirodnykh gazov [Development of the Natural Gas Deposits]. Мoscow: Nedra.
  5. Shabarov A. B. 2014. “Fiziko-matematicheskaya model' i metod rascheta techeniya gazokondensatnoy smesi v plaste” [Physico-Mathematical Model and Method for Calculating the Flow of a Gas-Condensate Mixture in a Reservoir]. Tyumen State University Herald. Physical and Mathematical Modeling. Oil, Gas, Energy, no 7, pp. 7-18.
  6. Shandrygin A.N. 1993. “Povyshenie effektivnosti razrabotki gazovyh, gazo-kondensatnyh i neftegazokondensatnyh zalezhey s treshchinovato-poristymi i neodnorodnymi poristymi kollektorami” [Increase Effective of Development Gas, Gas-Condensate and Oil-Gas-Condensate Fields with Fractured Porous and Non-Uniform reservoirs]. Dr. Sci. (Tech.) diss. Moscow.
  7. Kolbikov S. V. 2010. “Gas-Condensate Recovery for the Low Permeable Sands, Gas Cycling Efficiency”. SPE-136380. DOI: 10.2118/136380-MS