Counteraction to replacement of equity with borrowed capital for tax purposes: global practice

Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research


Release:

2020, Vol. 6. № 1 (21)

Title: 
Counteraction to replacement of equity with borrowed capital for tax purposes: global practice


For citation: Pokrovskaya N. V., Khmelinina M. A. 2020. “Counteraction to replacement of equity with borrowed capital for tax purposes: global practice”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 6, no. 1 (21), pp. 301-321. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2020-6-1-301-321

About the authors:

Natalia V. Pokrovskaya, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Department of Credit Theory and Financial Management, St. Petersburg State University; n.pokrovskaia@spbu.ru, ORCID: 0000-0002-8314-9470

Maria A. Khmelinina, M. Econ., St. Petersburg State University; Analyst, VEEAM; maria.khmelinina@yandex.ru 

Abstract:

The movement of capital within an international group of companies allows not only optimizing business processes, it may also serve to reduce tax liabilities. To effectively counter this phenomenon, international initiatives are being created to coordinate the actions of countries.

The aim of this study is to characterize the experience of applying the thin capitalization rules and earnings stripping rules when implementing an intragroup loan. This paper describes the tools to counter the replacement of equity with borrowed capital for tax purposes in the OECD recommendations, as well as corporate taxation practices in 151 countries in 2019-2020.

The rules for regulating intra-group financing for tax purposes have been introduced by a predominant number of countries, while thin capitalization rules are more common than the limit on interest. National rules for thin capitalization and earnings stripping vary by a number of parameters, including by scope and tax implications. The greatest differences are observed in the key fixed ratio of borrowed and own capital and the nature of restrictions on the interest.

The authors’ hypothesis about a high degree of convergence of national rules for regulating thin capitalization and earnings stripping rules with the recommendations of the OECD has not been fully confirmed. However, the trends of the second half of the 2010s confirmed the second hypothesis that in developed countries there is a gradual transition from thin capitalization rules to earnings stripping rules in accordance with BEPS actions.

References:

  1. Bannova K. A. 2011 “Problems of taxation of consolidated groups abroad and in Russia”. Problems of Accounting and Finance, no. 3, pp. 39-41. [In Russian]

  2. Brusov P. N., Filatova T. V., Orekhova N. P., Brusov P. P., Brusova A. P. 2013. “Taxes in the modern theory of value and company capital structure”. Bulletin of the Financial University, no. 4, pp. 32-49. [In Russian]

  3. Bubnov V. A. 2014. “The influence of financing on the transformation of the spatial structure of Russia”. European Social Science Journal, vol. 2, pp. 354-361. [In Russian]

  4. Vylkova E. S. 2017. Encyclopedia of Taxation Management of Economic Entities. Vol. 1. Saint Petersburg. 338 pp. [In Russian]

  5. Evstigneev E. N., Viktorova N. G. 2018. “The future of the Russian tax system”. Proceedings of the FEFU. Economics and Management, no. 2, pp. 5-15. [In Russian]

  6. Evstigneev E. N., Viktorova N. G. 2019. “The future of the Russian tax system: updated forecast”. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. Economy, no. 46, pp. 20-33. [In Russian]

  7. Ermakova E. A., Troyanskaya M. A. 2014. “Monitoring the global experience of tax regulation”. Bulletin of the Saratov State Socio-Economic University, no. 3, pp. 49-55. [In Russian]

  8. Ermoshina T. V., Koroleva L. P. 2014. “Problems of innovative growth of the national economy”. Bulletin of the Volga State University of Service. Series: Economics, no. 5 (37), pp. 21-25. [In Russian]

  9. Ivanov V. V., Bushueva N. V. 2007. “External sources of financing for Russian enterprises: realities and prospects”. Bulletin of St. Petersburg State University. Seria. 5, no. 1, pp. 96-107. [In Russian]

  10. Ivanov V. V., Tsytovich N. N. 2010. Corporate Financial Planning. Saint Petersburg: Nestor Story. 332 pp. [In Russian]

  11. Kovalev V. V., Kovalev V. V. 2019. Corporate Finance and Accounting: Concepts, Algorithms, Indicators. Moscow: Prospect. 991 pp. [In Russian]

  12. Lazutina D. V., Danilova E. P., Davydenko V. A. 2017. “Trust problems in the financial sector of the economy”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 273-295. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2017-3-3-273-295 [In Russian]

  13. Lvova N. A., Pokrovskaia N. V., Voronova N. S. 2017. “The concept of financial paradoxes: prerequisites for the formation and development trajectory”. ECO, no. 6, pp. 164-177. [In Russian]

  14. Pinskaya M. R., Tikhonova A. V. 2020. “The fiscal policy of the russian federation: answers to the main questions”. International Accounting, vol. 23, no. 1 (463), pp. 45-65. [In Russian]

  15. Pokrovskaia N. V. 2019. “Tax conditions for business in emerging markets”. Tomsk State University Bulletin. Economy, no. 46, pp. 215-228. [In Russian]

  16. Pokrovskaia N. V. 2015. “The impact of the crisis on tax conditions of debt financing of Russian companies”. Economics and Environmental Management, no. 4, pp. 70-76. [In Russian]

  17. Sinenko O. A. 2019. “On the attractiveness of fiscal instruments for the development of entrepreneurship in the Russian Far East”. Bulletin of UrFU. Series Economics and Management, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 86-103. [In Russian]

  18. Teplova T. V. 2013. “Work on borrowed capital. the optimal debt load of the company: from theoretical concepts to practical model foundations (part 1). Corporate Finance Management, no. 4 (58), pp. 199. [In Russian]

  19. Tyurina Yu. G. 2015. “Balancing the interests of the state and taxpayers in the context of the development of taxation theories”. Economic Revival of Russia, no. 1, pp. 77-82. [In Russian]

  20. Fedorova E. A., Lukasevich I. Ya. 2014. “Theories of dividend policy and their development on the example of the Russian market”. Finance and Credit, no. 19, pp. 2-8. [In Russian]

  21. Fedotov D. Yu., Orlova E. N. 2015. “Contribution of tax evasion to increasing the size of the shadow economy”. Financial Business, no. 4, pp. 26-32. [In Russian]

  22. International Tax: Austria Highlights 2020. Deloitte. 8 pp.

  23. Lore M. 1958. Thin Capitalization. New York: The Ronald Press. 150 pp.

  24. Nevzorova E. N., Bobek S., Kireenko A. P., Sklyarov R. A. 2016. “Tax evasion: the discourse among government, business and science community based on bibliometric analysis”. Journal of Tax Reform, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 227-244.

  25. OECD. Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital 2014 (Full Version). OECD Publishing, 2015. 2288 pp. DOI: 10.1787/9789264239081-en

  26. OECD. R (4). “Thin Capitalisation”. In: Model Tax Convention on Income and on Capital. OECD Publishing. 2010. 37 pp.DOI: 10.1787/9789264175181-97-en

  27. OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project. Explanatory Statement. OECD, 2015. 22 pp.

  28. OECD/G20 Limiting Base Erosion Involving Interest Deductions and Other Financial Payments, Action 4 — 2016 Update: Inclusive Framework on BEPS, OECD/G20 Base Erosion and Profit Shifting Project, OECD Publishing, 2016. 214 p. DOI: 10.1787/9789264268333-en

  29. Taxation of Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions. Germany. KPMG International. 2014. 28 pp.

  30. Thin Capitalization Legislation. A Background Paper for Country Sdministrations. 2012. Initial draft. 41 pp.