Contemporary secondary school: what is the competitive edge of a school graduate?

Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research


Release:

2020, Vol. 6. № 1 (21)

Title: 
Contemporary secondary school: what is the competitive edge of a school graduate?


For citation: Shafranov-Kutsev G. F., Gulyaeva L. V. 2020. “Contemporary secondary school: what is the competitive edge of a school graduate?”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 6, no. 1 (21), pp. 8-23. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2020-6-1-8-23

About the authors:

Gennady F. Shafranov-Kutsev, Academician of the Russian Academy of Education, Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Professor, Department of General and Economic Sociology, Research Advisor of University of Tyumen; ORCID: 0000-0001-7823-0525, Scopus ID: 56728858400, Researcher ID: N-5782-2017, RSCI, g.f.kucev@utmn.ru

Lyudmila V. Gulyaeva, Cand. Sci. (Soc.), Associate Professor, Department of General and Economic Sociology, University of Tyumen; ORCID: 0000-0002-0463-4743, Scopus ID: 57200188383, Researcher ID: B-5487-2019, lyudmila_gulyaeva_tmn@mail.ru

Abstract:

In the context of the contemporary educational process, researchers consider competitiveness as a system-forming category. On the one hand, they reflect on the level of formation of basic skills and competencies of a person, and on the other — on the range of adaptive capabilities of a person in a system of the changing social relations. This article aims to analyze the main factors affecting the formation of competitiveness among the contemporary high school students.

The results of this study indicate that the most significant factors contributing to the development of competitiveness include social activity, initiative, hard work, readiness for constant self-development, and actualization of personal potential. According to the surveyed respondents, the listed qualities become a prerequisite for successful studying and socializing of high school students, as well as for their further and professional development after graduation.

References:

  1. Agranovich M. L. 2014. “Why do we need ratings and how to fight them?”. In: Ratings in Education: From One-time Practices to Cultural Solutions. Moscow: Obshchestvennaya palata Rossiyskoy Federatsii, Komissiya po razvitiyu nauki i obrazovaniya; Higher School of Economics. 175 pp. https://www.oprf.ru/files/2014dok/reyting_obrazovanie01122014.pdf [In Russian]

  2. Atlas of New Professions. Accessed 28 June 2019. http://atlas100.ru [In Russian]

  3. Bocharova Ye. Ye. 2016. “Level characteristics of the relationship between personal competitiveness and subjective well-being of high school students”. Vestnik RUDN, seriya Pedagogika i psikhologiya, no. 1, pp. 62-70. [In Russian]

  4. Gurtov V. A., Khoteyeva Ye. A. 2018. “Schoolchildren’s career trajectory рlanning: focus on ‘want’, ‘can’ and ‘need’”. Integration of Education, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 134-150. DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.090.022.201801.134-150 [In Russian]

  5. Zhuravlev A. L., Ushakov D. V. 2008. “Education and competitiveness of the nation: psychological aspects”. Nauka — Kultura — Obshchestvo, no. 3, pp. 99-108. [In Russian] 

  6. Zhurkina A. Ya., Sergushin Ye. G., Sergushina O. V. 2016. “Theoretical aspects of formation of socio-professional self-determination of learners at education establishments”. Integration of Education, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 29-36. DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.082.020.201601.029-036 [In Russian]

  7. Shafranov-Kutsev G. F. (ed.). 2019. Youth, Competition, Competitiveness. Tyumen: UTMN Publishing House. 256 pp. [In Russian]

  8. Nodelman V., Loriya Ye. School Evaluation. https://iz.ru/746298/valeriia-nodelman-elena-loriia/shkolnye-otcenki [In Russian]

  9. “Three days of hell: How do schools in China pass state exams?”. 2019. Professionalnoe obrazovanie, no. 8, pp. 48-50. [In Russian]

  10. Tu A. Kh. “School rankings. Problems of forming an independent quality assessment of school education”. https://www.edukids.ru/articles/394 [In Russian]

  11. Fazlyyeva A. A. 2015. “Presentation of secondary school teachers on the competitiveness of high school students and the process of its formation”. Psikhologiya i pedagogika: metodika i problemy prakticheskogo primeneniya, no. 45, pp. 54-58. [In Russian]

  12. Shapovalov V. I. 2008. Formation of a Competitive Personality in the Conditions of School Supplementary Education. Edited by Yu. S. Tyunnikov. Sochi: SGUTiKD. 190 pp. [In Russian]

  13. Sharafutdinova M. N., Nizovskikh N. A. 2018. “Potential competitiveness of high school students in the practice of career-oriented diagnostics and consulting (the case of psychological readiness for management)”. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta, no. 1. DOI: 10.25588/CSPU.2018.01.24 [In Russian]

  14. Shafranov-Kutsev G. F., Gulyayeva L. V. 2017. “Research of competitive orientation among secondary school seniour students: current trends and prospects for nurturing (case study of Tyumen Region)”. Integration of Education, vol. 21, no. 4, pp. 651-668. DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.089.021.201704.651-668 [In Russian]

  15. Shafranov-Kutsev G. F., Gulyayeva L. V. 2019. “Career self-guidance as a key factor in the development of high school students’ competitive ability and orientedness”. Integration of Education, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 100-118. DOI: 10.15507/1991-9468.094.023.201901.100-118 [In Russian]

  16. RAEX. 2019. “RAEX publishes a rating of 100 best schools in Russia on the competitiveness of graduates”. April. https://raex-a.ru/releases/2019/Apr17 [In Russian]

  17. Armendáriz J., Tarango J., Machin-Mastromatteo J. D. 2018. “Analysis of institutional competitiveness of junior high schools through the admission test to high school education”. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, vol. 7, no. 1, January, pp. 52-60. DOI: 10.7821/naer.2018.1.259

  18. Belfield C., Levin H. 2002. The Effects of Competition on Educational Outcomes: A Review of US Evidence. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education Teachers College, Columbia University. https://www.tc.columbia.edu/ncspe/working-papers/OP35V2.pdf

  19. Himmler O. 2009. “The effects of school competition on academic achievement and grading standards”. CESifo Working Paper Series, June, no. 2676. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1427131

  20. Houston J. M., Lesmana C. B. J., Suryani L. K. 2012. “Competitiveness and individualism-collectivism in Bali and the U. S.”. Faculty Publications, vol. 78. Accessed 8 November 2019. https://scholarship.rollins.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1183&context=as_facpub

  21. MacLeod B. W., Urquiola M. 2015. “Reputation and school competition”. American Economic Review, vol. 105, no. 11, pp. 3471-3488. DOI: 10.1257/aer.20130332

  22. Robinson T. S. 2014. “Implicit and explicit education through school curriculum and society”. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, vol. 4, no. 1, January, pp. 21-28. http://www.ijhssnet.com/journals/Vol_4_No_1_January_2014/3.pdf

  23. Serdyukov P. 2017. “Innovation in education: what works, what doesn’t, and what to do about it?”. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching and Learning, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 4-33. DOI: 10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007

  24. Shimotsu-Dariol S., Mansson D. H., Myers S. A. 2012. “Students’ academic competitiveness and their involvement in the learning process”. Communication Research Reports, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 310-319. DOI: 10.1080/08824096.2012.723643

  25. Tebeanu A., Macarie G. 2013. “Cooperation and competitiveness in the educational environment from the students’ perspective”. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 76, pp. 811-815. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.04.211