Trends and Opportunities for the Development of Social Communications at the Russian Regions Level

About the author:

Gulnara F. Romashkina, Dr. Sci. (Soc.), Professor, Department of Economic Security, System Analysis and Control, University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia, g.f.romashkina@utmn.ru, https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7764-5566, Scopus Author ID: 16437113600, WoS ResearcherID: O-7221-2017

Abstract:

The modern world is often called a network (M. Castells), where communication plays a special role. The author of the article follows the understanding of social networks like space nodes and flows between them (J. Turner). Threads can be tangible, symbolic and emotional. It is important that the production, storage, sharing and structuring of these communications is largely determined by technology and digitization. An important feature of social networking is the competition between the nodes for the significance level. Given that the world is growing rapidly, is creating global networks of influence and power and excluding minor or weak nodes from the network, the regional society runs the risk of staggering behind in this competition. Backlog at the communicative level is equivalent to the structural marginalization. Therefore, an assessment of how fast, in what way, and under the influence of which factors the regional society is included in the global network of communication, allows us to estimate its competitive opportunities.

This article is an attempt to analyze the social development of communication processes, whereas social communication is understood as identifying and understanding the relationship networks. Social communications are known to quickly and easily enter the network, if the counterparty is perceived as a “friend” and the communication process is free of national, religious, territorial, mental or other barriers.

The empirical base of research was obtained in the process of 10-year socio-cultural monitoring by the sociologists of Tyumen State University, with the financial support of the Russian Humanitarian Foundation. The database includes the details of the “Social and cultural portraits of the Russian regions” project led by the Center for the Study of Social and Cultural Changes in the Institute of Philosophy. The article tests the hypothesis that the level of society’s preparedness to be included into the global communications network is directly related to the relationship “trust” — “communication” —“identification” on the scale of ‘friend” — “alien”. Direct citizen participation in Russia as a country with a developing democracy, reduces the level of institutional trust, but increases the level of network communications.

References:

1. Turner J. H. 1991. The Structure of Sociological Theory. 5th edition. Belmont.
2. Cook K. S., Whitmeyer J. M. 1986. “Two Approaches to Social Structure: Exchange Theory and Network Analysis”. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 12. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Review Co.
3. Monge P., Contractor N. 2003.Theories of Communication Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Marx K. 1953. Grundrisse der Kritik der politichess Okonomie [Outlines of the Critique of Political Economy], p. 176. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
5. Castells M. 2009. Communication Power. Oxford University Press. 
6. Norris P. 2000. A Virtuous Circle: Political Communications in Postindustrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511609343
7. Mulgan G. 1991. Communication and Control: Networks and the New Economies of Communication. Cambridge: Polity Press.
8. Putnam R. D. 1995. “Tuning In, Tuning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America”. PS: Political Science and Politics, vol. 28, no 4, pp. 664-683. DOI: 10.1017/S1049096500058856
9. Brehm J., Rahn W. 1997. “Individual-level Evidence for the Causes and Consequences of Social Capital”. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 41, no 3, pp. 999-1023. DOI: 10.2307/2111684
10. Robinson R. V., Jackson E. F. 2001. “Is Trust in Others Declining in America? An Age-Period-Cohort Analysis”. Social Science Research, vol. 30, no 1, pp. 117-145. DOI: 10.1006/ssre.2000.0692
11. Patterson M. 1996. Global Warming and Global Politics. Routledge; Patterson T. 1993. Out of Order. N. Y.: A. Knopf.
12. Greeting T., Linneman J. 2008. “Sins of the Father: Does Scandalous News Undermine Social Trust?” Paper presented at the International Communication Association Conference (Montreal, Canada, May 23-26).
13. Robinson M. J. 1975. “American Political Legitimacy in an Era of Electronic Journalism: Reflections on the Evening News”. In: Cater D., Adler R. (eds). 1975. Television as a Social Force: New Approaches to TV Criticism, pp. 97-139. N. Y.: Praeger.
14. Lapin N. I. 2016. Atlas modernizatsii Rossii i ee regionov: Sotsioekonomicheskie i sotsiokul'turnye tendentsii i problemy [Atlas of Modernization of Russia and Its Regions: Socioeconomic and Sociocultural Trends and Problems]. Moscow: Ves' Mir.
15. Romashkina G. F., Davydenko V. A. (eds). 2015. Sotsiokul'turnaya dinamika — portret Tyumenskoy oblasti: koll. monografiya [Sociocultural Dynamics — A Portrait of the Tyumen Region: Collective Monograph]. Tyumen: Tyumen State University Publishing House.
16. Held D. 2004. Global Covenant: The Social Democratic Alternative to the Washington Consensus. Cambridge: Polity Press; Held D., Kaya A. 2006. Global Inequality: Patterns and Explanations, Cambridge: Polity Press.
17. Hammond A. et al. 2007. The Next 4 Billion: Market Size and Business Strategy and the Base of the Pyramid. Washington (DC): World Resources Institute.
18. Kogay E. A. 2014. “Sotsial'nye praktiki grazhdanskogo uchastiya: kharakteristiki i otsenki” [Social Practices of Civic Participation: Characteristics and Assessments]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya. Politologiya. Sotsiologiya, no 2, pp. 62-66.