Primary Gonocity in the Embryogenesis of Coregonus nasus in the Aquaculture Outside Their Natural Areal

Tyumen State University Herald. Natural Resource Use and Ecology


Release:

2018, Vol. 4. №1

Title: 
Primary Gonocity in the Embryogenesis of Coregonus nasus in the Aquaculture Outside Their Natural Areal


For citation: Kolosova N. S., Selyukov A. G., Bogdanova V. A. 2018. “Primary Gonocity in the Embryogenesis of Coregonus nasus in the Aquaculture Outside Their Natural Areal”. Tyumen State University Herald. Natural Resource Use and Ecology, vol. 4, no 1, pp. 50-60. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7927-2018-4-1-50-60

About the authors:

Nadezhda S. Kolosova, Master Student, Department of Ecological Genetics, University of Tyumen; kolosovans21@gmail.ru

Alexander G. Selyukov, Dr. Sci. (Biol.), Professor, Department of Zoology and Evolution Ecology of Animals, University of Tyumen; ags-bios@yandex.ru

Vera A. Bogdanova, Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Leading Researcher, Aquaculture Laboratory, Berg State Research Institute on Lake and River Fisheries (Saint Petersburg); vera-bogdanova@yandex.ru

Abstract:

This article evaluates the state and level of proliferative activity of primary gonocytes (PG) in the embryos and larvae of broad whitefish from aquaculture. The authors have found that the cytomorphological parameters of gonocytes (the size of cells and nuclei, as well as the number of nucleoli) vary insignificantly in such embryos throughout embryogenesis, slightly increasing closer to the beginning of the postembryonal period. When increasing the number of PG cells by the end of embryogenesis, the proportion of polymorphonuclear cells decreased, while the number of mitosis cells increased. Dual-core PG and gonocytes in the composition of syncytial complexes could be observed during the whole embryogenesis. Syncytial formations in the post-embryonic period were absent. There were insignificant cytomorphological differences between primary gonocytes of embryos obtained from domestic stock and natural spawners.

The authors have observed earlier mitotic activity of the primary germ cells by the time of hatching in embryos of broad whitefish from domestical stock. That seems to depend on the difference in incubation temperatures in regions of different climatic zones.

References:

  1. Andriyasheva M. A. 2011. Geneticheskiye aspekty razvedeniya sigovykh ryb [Genetic Aspects of the Breeding of Whitefish]. Saint Petersburg: GosNIORKH.
  2. Efremova E. V. 2013. “Ranniy gametogenez sigovykh ryb r. Coregonus v usloviyakh iskusstvennogo soderzhaniya” [Early Gametogenesis of Coregonus Whitefishes in Artificial Conditions]. Cand. Sci. (Biol.) diss. abstract. Moscow: VNIRO.
  3. Lebedeva O. A. 1976. “Sravnitel’naya kharakteristika rannego ontogeneza sigovykh ryb” [Comparative Characteristics of Early Ontogeny of Whitefish]. In: Priroda i khozyaystvennoye ispol’zovaniye ozer Severo-Zapada Russkoy ravniny, pp. 30-57. Leningrad: LPTI.
  4. Litvinenko A. I., Kapustina Ya. A., Matkovskiy A. K., Semenchenko S. M. 2016. “Sovremennoye sostoyaniye i problemy vosstanovleniya zapasov sigovykh ryb Ob’-Irtyshskogo basseyna” [The Current State and Problems of Restoring the Stocks of Whitefish in the Ob-Irtysh Basin]. Proceedings of the 9th International Research and Practical Convention “Biologiya, biotekhnika razvedeniya i sostoyaniye zapasov sigovykh ryb” [Biology, Breeding Biotechnology, and the State of Stocks of Whitefish], pp. 57-60. Tyumen.
  5. Mikodina E. V. et al. 2009. Gistologiya dlya ikhtiologov: opyt i sovety [Histology for Ichthyologists: Experience and Advice]. Moscow: VNIRO. 
  6. Persov G. M. 1975. Differentsirovka pola u ryb [Differentiation of Sex in Fish]. Leningrad: LGU.
  7. Romeys B. 1953. Mikroskopicheskaya tekhnika [Microscopic Technology]. Moscow: Izd-vo inostrannoy literatury.
  8. Selyukov A. G. 2007. Morfofunktsional’nyy status ryb Ob’-Irtyshskogo basseyna v sovremennykh usloviyakh [Morphofunctional Status of Fish of the Ob-Irtysh Basin in Modern Conditions]. Tyumen: University of Tyumen.
  9. Selyukov A. G., Kibalova M. V., Mikhalenko E. V., Bogdanova V. A. 2016. “Formirovaniye fonda germinativnykh stvolovykh kletok v embriogeneze sigov baltiyskogo basseyna” [The Fund of the Germinative Stem Cells Formation in the Embryogenesis of Baltic Sea Basin Whitefishes]. Tyumen State University Herald. Natural Resource Use and Ecology, vol. 2, no 4, pp. 68-81. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7927-2016-2-4-68-81
  10. Extavour C. G. M. 2007. “Evolution of the Bilaterian Germ Line: Lineage Origin and Modulation of Specification Mechanisms”. Integrative and Comparative Biology, Symposium “Key Transitions in Animal Evolution”, pp. 1-16. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/icb/icm027
  11. Kobayashi T. 2010. “In Vitro Germ Cell Differentiation During Sex Differentiation in a Teleost Fish”. The International Journal of Developmental Biology, vol. 54, pp. 105-111. DOI: 10.1387/ijdb.082836tk
  12. Kurokawa H., Saito D., Nakamura S. et al. 2007. “Germ Cells Are Essential for Sexual Dimorphism in the Medaka Gonad”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 104, no 43, pp. 16958-16963. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0609932104