Method for assessing well interference at under-gas cap zone using CRM material balance model

Tyumen State University Herald. Physical and Mathematical Modeling. Oil, Gas, Energy


Release:

2024. Vol. 10. № 1 (37)

Title: 
Method for assessing well interference at under-gas cap zone using CRM material balance model


For citation: Bekman, A. D., & Ruchkin, A. A. (2024). Method for assessing well interference at under-gas cap zone using CRM material balance model. Tyumen State University Herald. Physical and Mathematical Modeling. Oil, Gas, Energy, 10(1), 155–173. https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-7978-2024-10-1-155-173

About the authors:

Alexander D. Bekman, Cand. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Chief Project Engineer, Tyumen Petroleum Research Center; ORCID: 0000-0002-5907-523Xadbekman@rosneft.ru

Alexander A. Ruchkin, Cand. Sci. (Tech.), Expert, Tyumen Petroleum Research Center; eLibrary AuthorID, aaruchkin@tnnc.rosneft.ru

Abstract:

Optimization of injection operation conditions is a primary task when designing the development of mature oil fields. To select optimal injectivities, solutions to the optimization problem based on a CRM (capacitance resistance model) analytical model are used. CRM models based on analytical solutions of the material balance equations of weakly compressible fluids due to their speed can be used as an alternative to flow simulation models in solving a number of problems to support oil field development. The main task of CRM models is to determine the well interference factor, i.e. the share of fluid produced due to a particular injection well. These factors can be used to analyze waterflooding and develop solutions for waterflood optimization.
At the same time, in some cases reservoir fluids may have high gas content, which is a classical limitation of a CRM model and leads to underestimation of the interference factors when estimating the injection performance. In this paper, the authors propose an approach to solve the problems of distortion of such factors, and for the first time in CRM application practice a model has been adapted for use in the conditions of high GORs and has a potential for being applied for under-gas cap zones. This is achieved by including in the equations the physical properties of gas and their behavior under reservoir conditions. The complication of algorithms did not significantly affect the model run time, but allowed to match the model both separately and jointly for liquid and gas phases. Thus, the improved classical CRM model has significantly expanded the scope of application of operational waterflood analysis tools for assessing the current situation.
No less complicated and urgent is the problem of forecasting the production of gas liberated in the conditions of the previously mentioned under-gas-cap zones, because it implies the need to estimate the future reservoir pressure. The authors intend to devote the next paper to finding a solution to this issue, taking into account the proposed new method of reservoir pressure estimation using a CRM model.

References:

Afanaskin, I. V., Volpin, S. G., Yalov, P. V., Yefimova, N. P., Lomakina, O. V., Shteinberg, Yu. M., & Mironov, D. T. (2016). Improved Higgins and Leighton stream tubes method for oil field flooding simulation. Proceedings in Cybernetics, (3), 39–50. [In Russian]

Afanaskin, I. V., Kryganov, P. V., Glushakov, A. A., & Yalov, P. V. (2020a). CRM well interference models for evaluating reservoir filtration and volumetric properties from production data. Russian Journal of Cybernetics, 1(1), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.51790/2712-9942-2020-1-1-3 [In Russian]

Afanaskin, I. V., Volpin, S. G., Shteinberg, Yu. M., Lomakina, O. V., & Solopov, D. V. (2020b). Application of CRM-models for a multi-well deconvolution of data on well bottom pressures and flow rates. Oilfield Engineering, (11), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.30713/0207-2351-2020-11(623)-60-67 [In Russian]

Afanaskin, I. V., Kolevatov, A. A., Glushakov, A. A., & Yalov, P. V. (2023). Consideration of non-linear deformation of the void space in the CRM-model when analyzing the development of a gas deposit for depletion. Geology, Geophysics and Development of Oil and Gas Fields, (2), 59–65. https://doi.org/10.33285/2413-5011-2023-2(374)-59-65 [In Russian]

Baykov, I. V., Kashnikov, O. Yu., Gatin, R. I., Khanov, A. V., & Danko, M. Yu. (2021). Forecasting the operation of wells in the bazhenov formation based on a modified dynamic material balance model. PROneft. Professionally about Oil, 6(4), 106–115. https://doi.org/10.51890/2587-7399-2021-6-4-106-115 [In Russian]

Bekman, A. D., Stepanov, S. V., Ruchkin, A. A., & Zelenin, D. V. (2019). A new algorithm for finding CRM-model coefficients. Tyumen State University Herald. Physical and Mathematical Modeling. Oil, Gas, Energy, 5(3), 164–185. https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-7978-2019-5-3-164-185 [In Russian]

Bekman, A. D., Pospelova, T. A., & Zelenin, D. V. (2020). A new approach to water cut forecasting based on results of capacitance resistance modeling. Tyumen State University Herald. Physical and Mathematical Modeling. Oil, Gas, Energy, 6(1), 192–207. https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-7978-2020-6-1-192-207 [In Russian]

Beckman, A. D. (2021). New method for splitting production and injection in joint wells using modified CRM model. Tyumen State University Herald. Physical and Mathematical Modeling. Oil, Gas, Energy, 7(3), 106–122. https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-7978-2021-7-3-106-122 [In Russian]

Bekman, A. D., & Zelenin, D. V. (2021). Application of advanced CRMP for reservoir pressure mapping. Tyumen State University Herald. Physical and Mathematical Modeling. Oil, Gas, Energy, 7(4), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-7978-2021-7-4-163-180 [In Russian]

Bekman, A. D. (2022). Accounting for stimulation treatments in modeling of oil reservoirs development using the material balance method. Matematicheskoe modelirovanie, 34(6), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.20948/mm-2022-06-02 [In Russian]

Danko, M. Yu., Brilliant, L. S., & Zavyzlov, A. S. (2019). Application of dynamic material balance method and CRM method (capacitance-resistive models) for reserves assessment in Achimov and Bazhenov reservoirs. Nedropolzovanie XXI vek, (4), 76–85. [In Russian]

Pospelova, T. A., Zelenin, D. V., Zhukov, M. S., Bekman, A. D., & Ruchkin, A. A. (2020). Water cut system optimization based on CRM model. Oilfield Engineering, (7), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.30713/0207-2351-2020-7(619)-5-10 [In Russian]

Stepanov, S. V., Stepanov, A. V., & Eletsky, S. V. (2013). Numerical-analytical approach towards salvation of the problem relating to on-line prediction of an oil well operation in conditions of a gas cone formation. Oilfield Engineering, (2), 53–58. [In Russian]

Stepanov, S. V., Sokolov, S. V., Ruchkin, A. A., Stepanov, A. V., Knyazev, A. V., & Korytov, A. V. (2018). Considerations on mathematical modeling of producer-injector interference. Tyumen State University Herald. Physical and Mathematical Modeling. Oil, Gas, Energy, 4(3), 146–164. https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-7978-2018-4-3-146-164 [In Russian]

Alghamdi, A., Hiba, M., Aly, M., & Awotunde, A. (2021, Oct. 12–15). A critical review of capacitance-resistance models [Conference paper SPE-206555-MS]. SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference, Virtual. https://doi.org/10.2118/206555-MS

Belyakov, A. A., Gulyaev, D. N., Krichevskiy, V. M., Nikonorova, A. N., & Iskibaev, R. E. (2021, Oct. 12–15). The efficiency of the novel technology reservoir pressure reconstruction without well shut-in and without production losses [Conference paper SPE-206490-MS]. SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference, Virtual. https://doi.org/10.2118/206490-MS

Holanda, R. W., Gildin, E., & Jensen, J. L. (2015, Nov. 18–20). Improved waterflood analysis using the capacitance-resistance model within a control systems framework [Conference paper SPE-177106-MS]. SPE Latin American and Caribbean Petroleum Engineering Conference, Quito, Ecuador. https://doi.org/10.2118/177106-MS

Holanda, R. W., Gildin, E., Jensen, J. L., Lake, L. W., & Kabir, C. S. (2018). A state-of-the-art literature review on capacitance resistance models for reservoir characterization and performance forecasting. Energies, 11, Article 3368. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11123368

Mohaghegh, Sh. D., Amini, Sh., Gholami, V., Gaskari, R., & Bromhal, G. (2012, Mar. 21–23). Grid-based surrogate reservoir modeling (SRM) for fast track analysis of numerical reservoir simulation models at the grid block level [Conference paper SPE-153844-MS]. SPE Western Regional Meeting, Bakersfield, California, USA. https://doi.org/10.2118/153844-MS

Sayarpour, M. (2008). Development and application of capacitance-resistive models to water/CO2 floods [Doctoral dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin].