Analytical model of convective temperature recovery in shut-in well

Tyumen State University Herald. Physical and Mathematical Modeling. Oil, Gas, Energy


Release:

2021. Vol. 7. № 3 (27)

Title: 
Analytical model of convective temperature recovery in shut-in well


For citation: Ramazanov A. Sh., Islamov D. F. 2021. “Analytical model of convective temperature recovery in a shut-in well”. Tyumen State University Herald. Physical and Mathematical Modeling. Oil, Gas, Energy, vol. 7, no. 3 (27), pp. 25-40. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7978-2021-7-3-25-40

About the authors:

Ayrat Sh. Ramazanov, Dr. Sci. (Tech.), Professor, Department of Geophysics, Bashkir State University (Ufa); ramaz@bsunet.ru

Denis F. Islamov, Senior Lecturer, Department of Geophysics, Bashkir State University (Ufa); islamovden@rambler.ru

Abstract:

Thermometry is the most informative method in the complex of field geophysical research. The method is applied at all stages of the well’s life. Modern technologies for recording the temperature in the well, for example, using a distributed fiber-optic sensor, allow continuous research, and in particular, to carry out temperature probing of the developed formations. Temperature sensing data can be used as an additional (alternative to pressure) independent source of information on reservoir properties.

To assess the parametric sensitivity of the temperature field in the well and to solve inverse problems of thermometry, mathematical models are needed to describe the thermohydrodynamic processes both in the reservoir and in the well.

This article is devoted to the development of an analytical model describing the change in temperature and pressure in the reservoir after a well shut-in, taking into account some approximations: zero compressibility of the reservoir, fluid and thermal conductivity. The pressure distribution in the reservoir is found from the solution of the piezoconductivity equation. And the temperature distribution from the heat flow equation. The method of characteristics was used for the solution.

The results of comparison of analytical and numerical solutions for temperature changes in a shut-in well are presented. It follows from the results obtained that the temperature after well shut-in is sensitive to the size of the near-wellbore zone with altered permeability and to the distribution of permeability in the formation.

The proposed analytical solution can be used in thermosimulators to solve inverse problems in order to estimate the parameters of the near-wellbore formation zone based on actual measurements of unsteady temperature in the wellbore of production wells, as well as for planning production geophysical studies using the thermometry method.

References:

  1. Basniev K. S., Kochina I. N., Maksimov V. M. 2006. Underground fluid mechanics. Мoscow; Izhevsk: Institute of Computer Research. 488 p. [In Russian]

  2. Valiullin R. A., Ramazanov A. Sh., Khabirov T. R. 2015. Interpretation of non-isothermal testing data based on the numerical simulation. SPE Russian Petroleum Technology Conference (26-28 October, Moscow, Russia). Paper SPE- 176589-RU DOI: 10.2118/176589-RU [In Russian]

  3. Valiullin R. A., Sharafutdinov R. F., Fedotov V. Ya., Zakirov M. F., Sharipov A. M., Akhmetov K. R., Azizov F. F. 2015. “The use of non-stationary thermometry for diagnosing the state of wells”. Oil industry, no. 5, pp. 93-96. [In Russian]

  4. Islamov D. F., Ramazanov A. Sh. 2016. “Non-stationary temperature field for fluid flow in heterogeneous reservoir”. Bashkir University Herald. vol. 21, no. 1. pp. 4-8. [In Russian]

  5. Musket M. 2004. The flow of homogeneous fluids in a porous medium. Мoscow; Izhevsk: Institute of Computer Research. 628 p. [In Russian]

  6. Ramazanov A. Sh., Islamov D. F. 2017. “Analytical model of non-stationary temperature in heterogeneous reservoir”. Tomsk Polytechnic University Herald. Geo Аssets Engineering, vol. 328, no. 5, pp. 39-48. [In Russian]

  7. Ramazanov A. Sh., Valiullin R. A., Sadretdinov A. A. 2010. Thermal modeling for characterization of near wellbore zone and zonal allocation. SPE Russia Oil and Gas Technical Conference and Exhibition (26-28 October, Moscow, Russia). Paper SPE‑136256-RU DOI: 10.2118/136256-RU [In Russian]

  8. Chekalyuk E. B. 1965. Thermodynamics of oil reservoir. Moscow: Nedra. 238 p. [In Russian]

  9. Mao Y., Zeidouni M. 2017. Analytical solutions for temperature transient analysis and near wellbore damaged zone characterization. SPE Reservoir Characterisation and Simulation Conference and Exhibition (8-10 May, Abu Dhabi, UAE). Paper SPE‑185990-MS. DOI: 10.2118/185990-MS.

  10. Mao Y., Zeidouni M. 2017. Near wellbore characterization from temperature transient analysis. SPE Symposium: Production Enhancement and Cost Optimisation (7 November, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia). Paper SPE-189234-MS. DOI: 10.2118/189234-MS

  11. Muradov K., Davies D., Durham C., Waterhouse R. 2017. Transient pressure and temperature interpretation in intelligent wells of the golden eagle field. SPE Europec featured at 79th EAGE Conference and Exhibition (12-15 June, Paris, France). Paper SPE‑185817-MS DOI: 10.2118/185817-MS