Optimization of technological parameters for cyclic steam stimulation of oil reservoirs

About the authors:

Konstantin M. Fedorov, Dr. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Professor, Scientific Advisor of the Institute of Physics and Technology, University of Tyumen; k.m.fedorov@utmn.ru

Alexander P. Shevelev, Cand. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Associate Professor, Professor, Department of Modeling of Physical Processes and Systems, School of Natural Sciences, University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia; a.p.shevelev@utmn.ru; ORCID: 0000-0003-0017-4871

Alexander Ya. Gilmanov, Cand. Sci. (Phys.-Math.), Senior Lecturer, Department of Modeling of Physical Processes and Systems, School of Natural Sciences, University of Tyumen, Tyumen, Russia; a.y.gilmanov@utmn.ru; ORCID: 0000-0002-7115-1629

Tatyana N. Kovalchuk, Undergraduate Student of Physics, Department of Modeling of Physical Processes and Systems, Institute of Physics and Technology, University of Tyumen; t.n.kovalchuk@mail.ru

Abstract:

Depletion of oil reserves leads to need to develop unconventional and hard-to-recover reserves, including high-viscosity oil fields. An effective way to do this is to use thermal enhanced oil recovery methods. Existing models do not consider the actual displacement of the heating front with convective flows. Therefore, the actual tasks are to model the physical processes occurring in the reservoir and to optimize the technological parameters of the development during cyclic steam stimulation.

This article is a continuation of earlier research and offers to consider a different version of movement of boundary of heating front. Clarification of the development of thermal field in reservoir is associated with setting the shape of boundary considering gravitational forces, in contrast to the previously proposed model, where the assumption of the frontal propagation of the thermal front is accepted.

The aims of the article are to determine the production rate for cyclic steam stimulation with described geometry; calculation steam injection time using real data, optimization of production.

The research methodology is based on the use of a system of conservation laws. The main equations are solved analytically, and the flow rate is calculated using Newton’s iterative method.

Thus, this article offers the first integrated physical-mathematical model of cyclic steam stimulation, considering the presence of convective and gravitational forces in the formation of heated zone profile. Problem of production optimization is solved using real data. The characteristic times are consistent with the real data. These calculations help to choose the most rational development strategy.

References:

1. Gilmanov A. Ya., Kovalchuk T. N., Shevelev A. P. 2020. “Physical and mathematical modeling of cyclic steam stimulation for oil reservoirs”. Tyumen State University Herald. Physical and Mathematical Modeling. Oil, Gas, Energy, vol. 6, no. 1 (21), pp. 176-191. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7978-2020-6-1-176-191 [In Russian]

2. Kovalchuk T. N., Gilmanov A. Ya., Shevelev A. P. 2020. “Physical and mathematical model of cyclic steam stimulation with parallel slope displacement of heating front”. Proceedings of the 26th Russian Science Conference of Students-Physicists and Young Scientists (VNKSF-26, Ufa, Bashkortostan), pp. 399-400. [In Russian]

3. Mitrushkin D. A., Khabirova L. K. 2010. “Mathematical modeling for problems of recovery of high-viscosity oil”. Vestnik CKR Rosnedra, no. 1, pp. 52-59. [In Russian]

4. Shevelev A. P. 2005. Mathematical Modeling of Cyclic Steam Stimulation on Oil Reservoirs: Cand. Sci. Phys-Math. diss. abstract. Tyumen: University of Tyumen, 23 pp. [In Russian]

5. Ansari S., Sabbagh R., Yusuf Y., Nobes D. S. 2019. “The role of emulsions in steam-assisted-gravity-drainage (SAGD) oil-production process: a review”. SPE Journal, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 1-21. DOI: 10.2118/199347-PA

6. Brooks R. T., Tavakol H. 2012. “Experiences in eliminating steam breakthrough & providing zonal isolation in SAGD wells”. SPE Western Regional Meeting (21-23 March, Bakersfield, California, USA). Conference paper SPE-153903-MS. 9 pp. DOI: 10.2118/153903-MS

7. Chiou R. C. S., Murer T. S. 1989. “Cyclic steam pilot in gravity drainage reservoir”. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition (8-11 October, San Antonio, Texas). Conference paper SPE-19659-MS. 14 pp. DOI: 10.2118/SPE-19659-MS

8. Lihong Han, Hang Wang, Jianjun Wang, Bin Xie, Zhihua Tian, Xingru Wu. 2018. “Strain-based casing design for cyclic-steam-stimulation wells”. SPE Production & Operations, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 409-418. DOI: 10.2118/180703-PA

9. Raj Deo Tewari, Fahmi Abdalla, Hisham Galal Lutfi, Yu Keqiang, Ali Faroug, Hisham Bakri, Li Guocheng. 2011. “Successful cyclic steam stimulation pilot in heavy oilfield of Sudan”. SPE Enhanced Oil Recovery Conference (19-21 July, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia). Conference paper SPE-144638-MS. 10 pp. DOI: 10.2118/144638-MS

10. Trigos E. M., Lozano M. E., Jimenez A. M. 2018. “Cyclic steam stimulation enhanced with nitrogen”. SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference (14-18 April, Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA). Conference paper SPE-190173-MS. 11 pp. DOI: 10.2118/190173-MS

11. Wilson A. 2018. “Cyclic steam stimulation results in high water retention for Kuwaiti heavy-oil field”. Journal of Petroleum Technology, vol. 70, no. 3, pp. 80-81. DOI: 10.2118/0318-0080-JPT

12. Xiaodong Han, Yigang Liu, Hao Liu, Qiuxia Wang, Jian Zou, Hua Zhang, Hongyu Wang, Xuanren Wu. 2018. “Case study: realization and evaluation of cyclic steam stimulation pilot for Offshore Oilfield, China”. SPE EOR Conference at Oil and Gas West Asia (26-28 March, Muscat, Oman). Conference paper SPE-190452-MS. 11 pp. DOI: 10.2118/190452-MS

13. Yanyong Wang, Liang Zhang, Shaoran Ren. 2019. “Coke deposition during air injection assisted cyclic steam stimulation process: mechanism study and field impact analysis”. SPE Western Regional Meeting (23-26 April, San Jose, California, USA). Conference paper SPE-195360-MS. 14 pp. DOI: 10.2118/195360-MS