Methods for determining the maximum size of through pores of membranes and ceramic samples

Tyumen State University Herald. Physical and Mathematical Modeling. Oil, Gas, Energy


Release:

2019, Vol. 5. №1

Title: 
Methods for determining the maximum size of through pores of membranes and ceramic samples


For citation: Ishkova Z. A., Kolunin V. S. 2019. “Methods for determining the maximum size of through pores of membranes and ceramic samples”. Tyumen State University Herald. Physical and Mathematical Modeling. Oil, Gas, Energy, vol. 5, no 1, pp. 87-96. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7978-2019-5-1-87-96

About the authors:

Zoya A. Ishkova, Associate, Earth Cryosphere Institute, Tyumen Scientific Centre of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; z.ishkova@yandex.ru

Vladimir S. Kolunin, Dr. Sci. (Geol.-Mineral.), Professor, Department of Earth Cryology, Industrial University of Tyumen; Earth Cryosphere Institute, Tyumen Scientific Centre of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences; askold@ikz.ru

Abstract:

Studies of the porous structure of solids are based on analytical methods, the number of which is currently over 60. Those methods are built on the physical principles of the porous structure parameters measure.

The following methods are used to determine the properties of microfiltration membranes: scanner electron microscopy, the “bubble-point” method, mercury porometry, and permeability measurements. The first three methods are used for the structural parameters, the last one — for the mass transfer characteristics. The method of determining the “bubble point” of flat membranes measures the minimum pressure at which the gas slips through the pores of the sample filled with liquid. The discrepancy between the results of the experiment when using different saturated liquids is a disadvantage of this method. In addition, the results of experiments can be affected by the rate of increase in pressure, size, length, and pore morphology. With an increase in pressure, a sample may fail, since the method is based on the mechanical action on the sample.

The authors have proposed a method for the “crystallization-onset” of water, which is an analogue of the method for determining the “bubble point” and refers to capillary methods. Testing of this method took place on samples of ceramics of various porosities and showed a stable relationship between the values of the pressure of the “bubble point” and the temperature of the beginning of crystallization of water. In this regard, it was decided to apply this method to determine the size of maximum through pores for various types of membranes.

The authors carried out a series of experiments to determine the critical temperature — the “crystallization-onset” method — and the pressure of the first bubble overshoot — the “bubble-point” method for ceramics and for Vladipor membranes. They have developed linear correlation dependences and compared the results studying the effect of filters height on the experiments results. Repeated experiments showed reproducibility of experimental data and the effect of re-freezing on the stability of membrane properties.

References:

  1. Gorelik Ya. B. 2002. Physics and Modeling of Cryogenic Processes in the Lithosphere. Novosibirsk. [In Russian]
  2. GOST R 50516-93. 1993. Polymer membranes. Method for determining the bubble point of flat membranes. Moscow: Gosstandart Rossii. [In Russian]
  3. Ershov E. D. 1979. Moisture Transfer and Cryogenic Textures in Dispersed Rocks. Moscow: Moscow State University. [In Russian]
  4. Ishkova Z. A., Kolunin V. S. 2017. “Evaluation of the maximum size of through pores in MFAS-type membranes found by different methods”. Instruments and Experimental Techniques, vol. 60, no 3, pp. 434-438. DOI: 10.1134/S0020441217030071
  5. Kolunin V. S., Ishkova Z. A. 2015. “Method for determining the maximum pore size through the ceramic in accordance with the temperature of the onset of crystallization water”. Instruments and Experimental Techniques, vol. 58, no 6, pp. 825-827. DOI: 10.1134/S0020441215050085
  6. Kolunin V. S. 2011. “Modeling of heat and mass transfer processes in frozen rocks with a mobile ice component”. Dr. Sci. (Geol.-Mineral.) diss. abstract. Tyumen: Earth Cryosphere Institute, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences. [In Russian]
  7. Plachenov T. G., Kolosentsev S. D. 1988. Porometrics. Leningrad: Chemistry. [In Russian]
  8. Kolunin V. S., Gubarkova Z. A., Kolunin A. V. 2014. RF Patent 2558378. IPC G01N 15/08. A method for determining the maximum pore size of a membrane. No. 2014108632/28. Published 10 August 2015. Bulletin no 22. [In Russian]
  9. Shtukenberg V. I. 1894. “On the fight against deeps on the railways”. Zhurnal Ministerstva putey soobshcheniya, vol. 2. [In Russian]
  10. Christenson H. K. 2001. “Confinement effects on freezing and melting”. Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 13, no 11, pp. 95-133. DOI: 10.1088/0953-8984/13/11/201
  11. Koopmans R. W. R., Miller R. D. 1966. “Soil freezing and soil water characteristic curves”. Soil Science Society of America, vol. 30, no 6, pp. 680-685. DOI: 10.2136/sssaj1966.03615995003000060011x