Release:
2024. Vol. 10. № 1 (37)About the authors:
Elena S. Vylkova, Dr. Sci. (Economics), Professor, Department of Economics, North-West Institute of Management, branch of RANEPA (Moscow); vylkova-es@ranepa.ru; ORCID: 0000-0002-3736-9683Abstract:
This article characterizes the dynamics of the tax burden of Russian IT-companies as a key factor in their economic sustainability. This study aims to determine regional characteristics of the level of tax burden in the field of information technology in order to identify best practices with the possibility of further replication of successful experience. To achieve this goal, an analysis is carried out of changes in the tax burden in the post-COVID period compared to 2019. Particular attention is paid to the dynamics of the tax burden depending on the scale of enterprises. The results show that the trend of reducing the tax burden in the post-COVID period is not stable for all Russian regions. The low level of tax burden is associated not so much with the industry of activity (in particular, with the field of information technology), but with regional characteristics (the creation of tax preferences in certain territories). Currently, state support for business through tax methods is aimed more at supporting certain regions and not the sphere of IT. The most typical scale of enterprises in the information technology sector, demonstrating a minimal tax burden, assumes revenue from 30 to 120 mln rubles a year. Such scaling of business in this area allows not only to use tax preferences established by the current Russian tax legislation, but also to find resources for organizing effective tax planning.Keywords:
References:
Ashurov, T. Sh., Abdurakhmanova, N. N., & Azizov, E. R. (2023). Tax burden as an indicator of the efficiency of the Russian tax system. Ekonomika i predprinimatel'stvo, (9), 673–676. https://doi.org/10.34925/EIP.2023.158.09.125 [In Russian]
Bubnov, V. A. (2022). The impact of the sanctions policy of unfriendly countries on the Russian financial system. Izvestiya Baykal'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 32(2), 283–289. https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-2759.2022.32(2).283-289 [In Russian]
Burov, V. Yu. (2015). Small business in the spatial development of the region. Vestnik Buryatskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, (2), 78–83. [In English]
Viktorova, N. G., & Evstigneev, E. N. (2022). Tax ecosystem as an element of the digital economy: a system-integrated approach to construction. Ekonomika. Professiya. Biznes, (2), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.14258/epb202218 [In Russian]
Vylkova, E. S., & Pokrovskaia, N. V. (2021a). Assessing the severity of taxation of companies in the region of the Russian Federation in an industry context. Nauchno-tehnicheskie vedomosti Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo politehnicheskogo universiteta. Ekonomicheskie nauki, 14(5), 46–58. https://doi.org/10.18721/JE.14504 [In Russian]
Vylkova, E. S., & Pokrovskaia, N. V. (2021b). Theoretical approaches to the interpretation of the tax burden, tax burden and severity of taxation. Izvestiya SPbGEU, (4), 45–51. [In Russian]
Vylkova, E. S. (Ed.). (2021). The Diversity of Modern Pandemic Reality. Publishing and Printing Association of Higher Educational Institutions. [In Russian]
Grinchel, B. M., & Nazarova, E. A. (2020). Methods of analysis and management of sustainable development of regional economies. Ekonomika i upravlenie, 26(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2020-1-23-34 [In Russian]
Zakharova, K. A., Aktaev, N. E., & Purgina, A. D. (2022). The impact of small and medium business finance on the level of economic wealth of the region. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, 8(2), 164–183. https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-7897-2022-8-2-164-183 [In Russian]
Kononovich, K. D., Celik, M. E., & Lipis, E. A. (2022). Comparison of VUCA and BANI concepts of vision of the world in the context of the business sphere. Nedelya nauki Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo morskogo tehnicheskogo universiteta, (1–1), 153–169. [In Russian]
Kuznetsov, Yu. V., Anokhina, E. M., & Melyakova, E. V. (2019). Approaches to assessing the strategic sustainability of large, medium and small businesses in depressed regions of Russia. Ekonomika i upravlenie, (10), 25–38. [In Russian]
Matushevskaya, E. A. (2018). Formation of an integrated approach to assessing the effectiveness of the functioning of a free economic zone. Ekonomika regiona, 14(3), 870–883. https://doi.org/10.17059/2018-3-13 [In Russian]
Nevzorova, E. N., Kireenko, A. P., & Mayburov, I. A. (2020). Spatial relationships and patterns of distribution of the shadow economy in Russia. Ekonomika regiona, 16(2), 464–478. https://doi.org/10.17059/2020-2-10 [In Russian]
Pinskaya, M. R., Steshenko, Yu. A., & Tsagan-Mandzhieva. K. N. (2021). Tax support during the coronavirus crisis: who to help? Voprosy ekonomiki, (5), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2021-5-129-144 [In Russian]
Sinenko, O. A. (2019). Attractiveness of fiscal instruments for the development of entrepreneurship in the Russian Far East. Vestnik UrFU. Seriya ekonomika i upravlenie, 18(1), 86–103. https://doi.org/10.15826/vestnik.2019.18.1.005 [In Russian]
Sinenko, O. A. (2019). Practice of applying regulatory mechanisms in special economic zones and IT clusters as an element of digitalization development. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika, (46), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.17223/19988648/46/17 [In Russian]
Yakunina, A. V., Ermakova, E. A., Yakunin, S. V., & Semernina, Yu. V. (2022). Financial assessment of the vulnerability of sectors of the Russian economy. Nauchnoe obozrenie: teoriya i praktika, 12(3), 404–415. [In Russian]
Athira, A., & Ramesh, V. K. (2023). COVID-19 and corporate tax avoidance: International evidence. International Business Review, 32(4), art. 102143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2023.102143
Chen, W., & Jin, R. (2023). Does Tax Uncertainty affect Firm Innovation Speed? Technovation, 125, art. 102771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102771
Dang D., Fang H., & He, M. (2019). Economic policy uncertainty, tax quotas and corporate tax burden: evidence from China. China Economic Review, 56, art.101303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.101303
Fedotov, D. Yu. (2021). Tax burden and shadow economy growth in Russian regions. Journal of Tax Reform, 7(3), 284–133. https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2021.7.3.104
Jansky, P. (2022). Corporate Effective Tax Rates for Research and Policy. Public Finance Review, (51), 171–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/10911421221137203
Kosturikova, I., & Chobotova, M. (2023). New Trends in Intellectual Property and Tax Burden of Innovative Corporations. Procedia — Social and Behavioral Sciences, 110, 93–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.12.851
Labunets, Iu. E., & Mayburov, I. A. (2022). The Impact of the Size of Enterprises on Tax Evasion in the Forestry Industry of Russia. Journal of Tax Reform, 8(1), 88–101. https://doi.org/10.15826/jtr.2022.8.1.110
Nuchter, V., Abson, D. J., Wehrden, H. von, & Engle, J. (2021). The Concept of Resilience in Recent Sustainability Research. Sustainability, 13(5), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052735
Sanchez-Ballesta, J. P., & Yague, J. (2023). Tax avoidance and the cost of debt for SMEs: evidence from Spain. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 19(2), art. 100362. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcae.2023.100362
Schilling, T., Wyss, R., & Binder, C. R. (2018). The Resilience of Sustainability Transitions. Sustainability, 10(12), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124593
Sinenko, O., & Mayburov, I. (2017). Comparative Analysis of the Effectiveness of Special Economic Zones and Their Influence on the Development of Territories. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 7(1), 115–122.
Wang, L., & You, K. (2022). The Impact of political connections on corporate tax burden: evidence from the Chinese market. Finance Research Letters, 47, part B, art. 102944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2022.102944
Wen-Dong, Lv., Dan, T., Yuan, W., & Rui-Xue, X. (2018). Innovation Resilience: A New Approach for Managing Uncertainties Concerned with Sustainable Innovation. Sustainability, 10(10), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103641