TYPES OF CORRUPTION AND ASSESSMENT OF THEIR IMPACT ON SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROCESSES IN SOCIETY

Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research


Release:

2022, Vol. 8. № 3 (31)

Title: 
TYPES OF CORRUPTION AND ASSESSMENT OF THEIR IMPACT ON SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROCESSES IN SOCIETY


For citation: Fedotov D. Yu. 2022. “Types of corruption and assessment of their impact on socio-economic processes in society”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 8, no. 3 (31), pp. 188-210. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2022-8-3-188-210 

About the author:

Dmitry Yu. Fedotov, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Professor, Department of International Relations and Customs, Baikal State University (Irkutsk); fdy@inbox.ru, ORCID: 0000-0001-9908-802X

Abstract:

This article studies the concept of corruption and its individual types. Corruption can be observed in many countries of the world, but its extent differs greatly. The institutional conditions that have formed in different countries have become prerequisites for the differentiation of countries by the corruption level. This article aims to identify the mutual influence between corruption phenomena and socio-economic processes in society. Following the analysis of literature review, three types of corruption have been identified: domestic, business, and political. The hypothesis of the study is the assumption that certain types of corruption can have an uneven impact on socio-economic processes based on the level of development of the country. Studying corruption has required using the methods of induction, deduction, scientific generalization, classification, aspect analysis, and correlation analysis. The empirical data was collected from the following international organizations: the World Bank, Transparency International, Reporters without Borders. The results show that corruption of a certain type involves subjects of certain categories in corruption relations, influencing specific types of public relations. Business corruption has a negative impact on economic development, while domestic corruption has a negative impact on the trends in the development of social relations in society. There was a high direct closeness of the relationship between the level of corruption and GDP per capita, as well as between the level of corruption and the index of press freedom; there is a noticeable inverse closeness of the relationship between the level of corruption and the Gini coefficient.

References:

  1. Arkhipov E. L., Sushkova T. V. 2019. “Corruption crime and its development in Russia”. Shadow Economy, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 107-114. [In Russian]
  2. Babelyuk E. G., Savin S. D., Shchepelkov V. F. 2018. “About the national system for monitoring the effectiveness of anti-corruption”. All-Russian Criminological Journal, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 613-621. [In Russian]
  3. Barsukova S. Yu., Zvyagintsev V. I. 2006. “The mechanism of ‘political investment’, or how and why Russian business participates in elections and pays for party life”. Policy. Political studies, no. 2, pp. 110-121. [In Russian]
  4. Bakhtairova E. A., Anganova A. V. 2021. “Assessment of the level of corruption as a component of an integral indicator of public administration: foreign experience and Russian practice”. Journal of Baikal Studies, vol. 12, no. 4, p. 18. [In Russian]
  5. Boboshko N. M. 2020. “Corruption in public procurement as a threat to the economic security of the state”. Bulletin of Economic Security, no. 6, pp. 19-25. [In Russian]
  6. Gorshenkov G. N. 2021. “Corruption as a criminological category”. Russian Journal of Economics and Law, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 540-555. [In Russian]
  7. Kolesnichenko E. A., Burmistrova A. A., Petrov D. I., Savvateeva O. V. 2020. “Features of the manifestation of shadow relations in the field of public procurement”. Bulletin of the Volga State University, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 114-121. [In Russian]
  8. Kuanaliev A.A. 2020. “Corruption as a factor affecting the level of prosperity”. Colloquium-Journal, no. 13-4 (65), pp. 69-75. [In Russian]
  9. Mitrofanov N. V. 2020. “Corruption in Russian higher education”. Union of Criminologists and Criminologists, no. 4, pp. 140-147. [In Russian]
  10. Novichkova E. E. 2018. “The concept, content and types of corruption” Bulletin of the Ural Institute of Economics, Management and Law, no. 1 (42), pp. 35-36. [In Russian]
  11. Podolny N. A., Podolnaya N. N. 2016. “Corporate corruption: justification of the problem”. All-Russian Criminological Journal, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 521-530. [In Russian]
  12. Ponomareva E. V., Kalinina G. V., Tsukanova T. G. 2019. “Violations in the field of public procurement”. Bulletin of the Altai Academy of Economics and Law, no. 6-1, pp. 122-126. [In Russian]
  13. Reshnyak M. G., Gladkikh V. I. 2021. “Corruption crimes: actual problems of differentiation of criminal responsibility”. All-Russian Criminological Journal, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 756-765. [In Russian]
  14. Rose-Ackerman S. 2010. Corruption and the State. Causes, Consequences, Reforms. 2nd edition. Moscow: Logos. 356 pp. [In Russian]
  15. Fialkovskaya I. D. 2018. “Corruption: concepts, signs, types”. Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod University named after N. I. Lobachevsky, no. 1, pp. 137-142. [In Russian]
  16. World Bank. 2020. Doing Business 2020: Comparing Business Regulation in 190 Economies. Washington, DC: World Bank. 136 pp. DOI: 10.1596/978-1-4648-1440-2
  17. Huntington S. 1968. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, Connecticut: Yale University Press. 516 pp.
  18. Reporters without Borders. 2020. “Index 2020”. https://rsf.org/en/index?year=2020
  19. Transparency International-Russia. 2021 Corruption Perceptions Index. https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi/2021
  20. World Bank Open Data. http://data.worldbank.org