Evolution of the concept of an “official” in the domestic law: problems and prospects

About the authors:

Viktor I. Morozov, Honored Lawyer of the Russian Federation, Cand. Sci. (Jur.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Law Disciplines, University of Tyumen; v.i.morozov@utmn.ru

Sergey G. Losev, Cand. Sci. (Jur.), Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law Disciplines, University of Tyumen; s.g.losev@utmn.ru

Andrey A. Chukreev, Cand. Sci. (Jur.), Associate Professor, Department of Labor Law and Business, Institute of State and Law, University of Tyumen; a.a.chukreev@utmn.ru; ORCID: 0000-0002-9502-8860

Abstract:

Defining the concept and features of a “public official” and of a “person performing managerial functions in a commercial or other organization” in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation, first of all, is important to distinguishing those offenders who will be held criminally responsible in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 23 or Chapter 30 of the Criminal Code. It is obvious that by expanding or limiting the features of a public official or a person performing managerial functions in a commercial or other organization, it is possible to influence criminal statistics. There is an extensive literature on this topic, but this paper is devoted to the issue of correlation between the scope of the two concepts under consideration, which has repeatedly changed in the history of the post-Soviet development of criminal legislation of Russia.

The purpose of this work is to compare the concepts of a “public official” and of a “person performing managerial functions in a commercial or other organization” in the domestic criminal law; to reveal the way how the content of the concept of an “official” evolved in the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation; to formulate proposals for the most optimal legal regulation of criminal liability for nonperformance or improper performance of duties by persons governing commercial organizations.

The object of the study is public relations arising during the criminal-legal regulation of responsibility for improper performance or non-performance of duties by officials.

The subject of the research is current Russian as well as null and void Soviet criminal legislation regulating responsibility of an official or a person performing managerial functions.

While writing this paper the authors used historical and formal-legal methods, through which the evolution of the concept of an “official” in the Soviet and post-Soviet period was investigated.

Based on the results of the research, the authors propose changes to the existing criminal legislation, the essence of which is the clear distinction of features of an official and a person performing managerial functions in commercial organizations.

References:

1. Aksenov D. V., Borisov A. S. 2021. “The concept of an ‘official’ in criminal law”. Proceedings of the 15^th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Problems of rights protection: history and modernity” (29 October 2020, Saint Petersburg), pp. 312-316. Saint Petersburg: Pushkin Leningrad State University. [In Russian]

2. Demkina A. V., Rozhdaykina E. I. 2020. “To the question of the concept of an ‘official’ in criminal law”. Proceedings of the 19^th All-Russian Scientific Conference of Students and Young Researchers “Current issues of public law” (12-13 November 2020, Yekaterinburg). Volume 19. Pp. 257-264. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Law University. [In Russian]

3. Collection of Laws of the RSFSR. 1926. No. 80. Art. 600. On enactment of the Criminal Code of RSFSR of 1926 edition: Resolution of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee of 22 November 1926 (with the Criminal Code of RSFSR). Accessed 27 January 2022. http://www.consultant.ru/cons/cgi/online.cgi?req=doc&base=ESU&n=3274&dst=100... [In Russian]

4. Collection of Laws of the RSFSR. 1922. No. 15. Art. 153. On enactment of the Criminal Code of RSFSR: Resolution of the All-Russian Central Executive Committee of 1 June 1922 (with the Criminal Code of RSFSR). Accessed 27 January 2022. https://docs.cntd.ru/document/901757375 [In Russian]

5. Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2007. No. 49. Art. 6078. On the state atomic energy corporation “Rosatom”: Federal Law of 1 December 2007 No. 317-FZ. Accessed 27 January 2022. https://base.garant.ru/12157441/ [In Russian]

6. Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2007. No. 48 (part 2). Art. 5814. On state corporation for promotion of development, production and export of high-technology industrial products “Rostec”: Federal Law of 23 November 2007 No. 270-FZ. Accessed 27 January 2022. https://base.garant.ru/12157231/ [In Russian]

7. Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2007. No. 22. Art. 2562. On state development corporation “VEB.RF”: Federal Law of 17 May 2007 No. 82-FZ. Accessed 27 January 2022. https://base.garant.ru/12153549/ [In Russian]

8. Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2002. No. 4. Art. 251. On privatization of state and municipal property: Federal Law of 21 December 2001 No. 178-FZ. Accessed 27 January 2022. https://base.garant.ru/12125505/ [In Russian]

9. Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2020. No. 52 (part 1). Art. 8581. On the public law company “Edinyy zakazchik v sfere stroitelstva” and on amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation: Federal Law of 22 December 2020 No. 435-FZ. Accessed 27 January 2022. https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/74998893/ [In Russian]

10. Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2021. No. 1 (part 1). Art. 32. On the public law company “Edinyy regulyator azartnykh igr” and on amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation: Federal Law of 30 December 2020 No. 493-FZ. Accessed 27 January 2022. https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/400056878/ [In Russian]

11. Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2017. No. 31 (part 1). Art. 4767. On a public law company to protect the rights of citizens — participants of shared construction in the case of insolvency (bankruptcy) of developers and on amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation: Federal Law of 29 July 2017 No. 218-FZ. Accessed 27 January 2022. https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/71632782/ [In Russian]

12. Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2016. No. 27 (part 1). Art. 4169. On public law companies in the Russian Federation and on amendments to certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation: Federal Law of 3 July 2016 No. 236-FZ. [In Russian]

13. Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 1996. No. 1. Art. 1. On joint stock companies: Federal Law of 26 December 1995 No. 208-FZ (rev. of 2 July 2021). Accessed 27 January 2022. https://base.garant.ru/10105712/ [In Russian]

14. Sergeev A. P. 2020. “Misinterpretation of civil law provisions in criminal proceedings”. Zakon Journal, no. 1, pp. 139-148. [In Russian]

15. Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 1996. No. 25. Art. 2954. Criminal Code of the Russian Federation of 13 June 1996 No. 63-FZ. Accessed 27 January 2022. https://base.garant.ru/10108000/ [In Russian]

16. Vedomosti of the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR. 1960. No. 40. Art. 591. Criminal Code of the RSFSR (approved by the Supreme Soviet of the RSFSR on 27 October 1960). Accessed 27 January 2022. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_2950/ [In Russian]