Was there a reform: to the question of the legal significance of the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of 2020

Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research


Release:

2022, Vol. 8. № 1 (29)

Title: 
Was there a reform: to the question of the legal significance of the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of 2020

Author: Yuriy V. Kim

For citation: Kim Yu. V. 2022. “Was there a reform: to the question of the legal significance of the amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of 2020”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 8, no. 1 (29), pp. 136-151. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2022-8-1-136-151

About the author:

Yuriy V. Kim, Dr. Sci. (Jur.), Professor, Department of State and Administrative Law, Law Institute of Kemerovo State University; Yu_kim@mail.ru; ORCID: 0000-0001-7389-7670

Abstract:

The question of whether a major change in the text of the Russian Constitution in 2020 can be considered as a constitutional reform is not that simple. Usually, reforms are preceded by thorough preparation. Successful reforms require adequate organizational, legal, doctrinal and human resources support. Objectively, the need for a systematic adjustment of the text of the Constitution was growing in Russian society. The societal demand for constitutional reform has been developing since the moment the Constitution was adopted. This is due to many flaws and gaps that were found later during its implementation. At the same time, the process of transformation of the Constitution started unexpectedly for society, passed quickly, did not have proper support and led to contradictory results. The purpose of this research is to analyze organizational and legal, doctrinal as well as formal and legal aspects of the innovation based on scientific methods. Moreover, deviations from the due legal procedure for amending stated by the Constitution itself and other laws are identified. The methods used for the constitutionalization of legislation, violation of the structural and content-related integrity of the text, technical and legal errors, the legal significance of the plebiscite on the approval of amendments to the Constitution of Russia are critically assessed. In this regard, the question of the state of constitutionalism in Russia and possible measures to strengthen it remains relevant.

References:

  1. Alekseev S. S. 2009. At the origin of the Constitution of Russia (subjective notes). Yekaterinburg. 43 pp. [In Russian]

  2. Ansoff I. 1989. Strategic management. Edited by L. I. Evenko. Moscow: Ekonomika. 519 pp. [In Russian]

  3. Baburin S. N. 2021. “The 2020 Constitutional reform in the Russian Federation as a way to strengthen the nation”. Constitutional and Municipal Law, no. 1, pp. 3-6. [In Russian]

  4. Bobrova N. A. 2021. “The 2020 Constitutional Reform as a solution of the transit of power problem of 2024”. Constitutional and Municipal Law, no. 2, pp. 3-9. [In Russian]

  5. Bondar N. S. 2012. Judicial constitutionalism in Russia in relation to constitutional justice. Moscow: Formula prava. 544 pp. [In Russian]

  6. Kleandrov M. I. 2021. “On challenging justice mechanism novelties of 2020 to the Constitution of the Russian Federation”. Constitutional and Municipal Law, no. 1, pp. 7-11. [In Russian]

  7. Komarova V. V. 2020. “Constitutional reform 2020 in Russia (selected issues)”. Actual Problems of Russian Law, vol. 15, no. 8, pp. 22-31. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2020.117.8.022-031 [In Russian]

  8. Kondrashev A. A. 2021. “The Constitutional amendments of 2020: on collisions and defects giving birth to unavoidable conflicts between the ‘Eternal Chapters’ and Chapters 3 to 8 of the Russian Constitution”. Constitutional and Municipal Law, no. 3, pp. 18-29. [In Russian]

  9. Proceedings of the All-Russian Scientific and Practical Conference with International Participation “Constitutional reform in Russia 2020: political and legal significance” (4 December 2020). 2021. Krasnodar: Kuban State University. 186 pp. [In Russian]

  10. Kruss V. I. 2014. “Constitutionalization of national law and international law order”. Proceedings of the International Scientific and Practical Conference “The Constitution — the main law of the Belarus state and society (to the 20th anniversary of the adoption)” (11-12 March 2014, Minsk). Edited by G. A. Vasilevich. Pp. 56-58. Minsk: Pravo i ekonomika. [In Russian]

  11. Kutafin O. E. 2008. Russian constitutionalism: monograph. Moscow: NORMA. 544 pp. [In Russian]

  12. Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2020. No. 50 (part 3). Art. 8039. On the State Council of the Russian Federation: Federal Law of 8 December 2020 No. 394-FZ. [In Russian]

  13. Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2020. No. 52 (part 1). Art. 8585. On the procedure of the formation of the Federation Council of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation: Federal Law of 22 December 2020 No. 439-FZ. [In Russian]

  14. Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2016. No. 27 (part 1). Art. 4169. On public law companies in the Russian Federation and on amending certain legislative acts of the Russian Federation: Federal Law of 3 July 2016 No. 236-FZ. [In Russian]

  15. Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2020. No. 7. Art. 822. On ensuring the participation of citizens of the Russian Federation in resolving issues on amending the Constitution of the Russian Federation: Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 14 February 2020 No. 32-rp. [In Russian]

  16. Ozhegov S. I., Shvedova N. Yu. 1999. Dictionary of the Russian language. Moscow: Azbukovnik. 944 pp. [In Russian]

  17. Bulletin of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. 1996. No. 3. On verification of the constitutionality of paragraph 2 of the Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of 3 October 1994 no. 1969 “On measures to strengthen the unified system of executive power in the Russian Federation” and of paragraph 2.3 of the Regulation on the head of the administration of a territory, region, federal city, autonomous region, autonomous district approved by the named Decree: Decree of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation of 30 April 1996 No. 11-P. [In Russian]

  18. Journal of Constitutional Justice. 2011. No. 3. “Judicial (‘living’) constitutionalism: doctrine and practice. Transcript of the Round Table of the Department of State and Administrative Law of the Law Faculty of St. Petersburg State University (St. Petersburg, March 5, 2011)”. 1-30 pp. [In Russian]

  19. Official Internet Website of the Server of Public Authorities of the Russian Federation “Ofitsialnaya Rossiya”. Accessed 16 October 2021. http://gov.ru/main/ministry/isp-vlast44.html [In Russian]

  20. Ilichev L. F., Fedoseev P. N., Kovalev S. M., Panov V. G. (eds.). 1983. Philosophic encyclopedic dictionary. Moscow: Sovetskaya entsiklopedia. 840 pp. [In Russian]

  21. Council of Europe; European Commission for Democracy through Law (Venice Commission). 2021. 23 March. CDL-AD (2021)005-e. Russian Federation — Interim opinion on constitutional amendments and the procedure for their adoption, adopted by the Venice Commission at its 126th Plenary Session (online, 19-20 March 2021). Strasbourg. Accessed 14 February 2022. https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2021)005-e