Entrepreneurial potential of Belarus citizens living in areas contaminated by radionuclides

About the authors:

Ekaterina V. Kargapolova, Dr. Sci. (Soc.), Associate Professor, Deputy Director for Science, Higher School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Plekhanov Russian University of Economics (Moscow); Professor, Department of Economic Sociology and Psychology of Entrepreneurship, Belarus State Economic University (Minsk); k474671@list.ru; ORCID: 0000-0002-2892-3953

Irina V. Lashuk, Cand. Sci. (Soc.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Economic Sociology and Psychology of Entrepreneurship, Belarus State Economic University (Minsk); Lashuki1974@gmail.com

Abstract:

This article analyzes the strategies in entrepreneurship of the citizens of the Republic of Belarus who currently live in the areas that were affected by the Chernobyl disaster. The empirical base consists of the results from the scientific research “To carry out a socio­logical assessment of the entrepreneurial potential of the territories affected by the Chernobyl disaster within the framework of the event ‘To conduct a sociological assessment of the factors, mechanisms and conditions of development of small and medium-sized businesses in the territories affected by the accident at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant’” of the State Program for elimination of the effects of the Chernobyl disaster for 2021-2025 (No. GR 20213172).

Object of the present research is the adult (aged 16-59 years) population of the Republic of Belarus who lives in the areas affected by the Chernobyl disaster.

Subject of the research is entrepreneurial activity of different socio-demographic and territorial groups of the population of the areas affected by the Chernobyl disaster as well as their evaluation of the conditions for small and medium-sized business development.

The research resulted in identifying the hybrid nature of socio-economic systems of the regions under study as the employment structure combines market and non-market preferences and motivations with a slight prevalence of market ones. On the one hand, in a present competitive environment mixed economic systems that combine market and non-market structures have a greater chance of success. On the other hand, in such systems a strategic value is assigned to the need for strengthening of moral structures of a personality which allow to maintain balance between material and spiritual aspects of life. After all, the preponderance of material aspects leads to consumer sentiments that are difficult to satisfy. As a consequence, it results in the decline of fertility rates, environmental issues, and the increase of social tensions.

References:

1. Andrianova E. V., Tarasova A. N., Pecherkina I. F. 2018. “Motivation and labor values of youth: development paradoxes”. Monitoring of Public Opinion: Economic and Social Changes, no. 3 (145), pp. 324-343. [In Russian]

2. Belyaeva L. A. 2018. “Social distances as a feature of the contemporary Russian social space”. RUDN Journal of Sociology, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 58-72. [In Russian]

3. Official website of the Belarus Telegraph Agency (BelTA). “Belarus approved the strategy for small and medium-sized business development up to 2030”. Accessed 23 January 2021. https://www.belta.by/economics/view/v-belarusi-utverzhdena-strategija-razvitija-malogo-i-srednego-pr... [In Russian]

4. Verkhovskaya O. R., Dorokhina M. V. 2008. “Entrepreneurship activity in contemporary Russia”. Russian Management Journal, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 25-52. [In Russian]

5. Official website of the Belarus Telegraph Agency (BelTA). “The contribution of small and medium-sized businesses to the GDP of Belarus in 2020 was 26.4%”. https://www.belta.by/economics/view/vklad-malogo-i-srednego-biznesa-v-vvp-belarusi-za-2020-god-sosta... [In Russian]

6. Glazyev S. Yu. 2018. “What policies will ensure priority development of Russian economy?”. EURASIAN INTEGRATION: Economics, Law, Politics, no. 2 (24), pp. 12‑16. [In Russian]

7. Gorshkova E. N. 2015. “Entrepreneurship activity of Russians”. Approbation [Aprobatsiya], no. 12 (39), pp. 157-159. [In Russian]

8. Zikunova I. V. 2012. “Regional economic safety and entrepreneurial activeness”. Business Security, no. 4, pp. 12-16. [In Russian]

9. Lashuk I. V. 2020. “ Life strategies of sociocultural behavior of residents of the territories affected by the Chernobyl accident”. Journal of the Belarusian State University. Sociology, no. 1, pp. 93-101. [In Russian]

10. Lashuk I. V., Martishchenkova E. V. 2018. “Information support for Belarussian territories affected by the accident at Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant”. Territorial Development Issues, no. 3 (43), pp. 1-18. [In Russian]

11. Martishchenkova E. V. 2015. “Reconstruction prospects of the territories affected by the Chernobyl accident (on the assessments of the contaminated areas residents)”. Sociological Almanac, no. 6, pp. 154-163. [In Russian]

12. Martishchenkova E. V. 2017. “Status and development of social infrastructure as a significant component of revival in the areas affected by Chernobyl disaster”. Sociological Almanac, no. 8, pp. 286-294. [In Russian]

13. Matveeva N. I., Zvolinsky V. P. 2020. “Entrepreneurial potential as an economic category”. Theoretical and Applied Problems of Agro-Industry, vol. 44, no. 2, pp. 49-55. [In Russian]

14. National Statistical Committee of the Republic of Belarus. 2020. The residential areas and population of the Republic of Belarus living in the areas of radioactive contamination as a result of the Chernobyl disaster, as of 1 January 2020: statistical bulletin. Minsk. 152 pp. [In Russian]

15. Nikolenko N. A., Dulina N. V., Sitnikova Ya. I. 2021. “Adaptive behavior of prepensioners in the conditions of pandemic, digitalization and computerization of society”. Primo Aspectu, no. 3 (47), pp. 28-37. [In Russian]

16. Platonova E. D. 2011. “Entrepreneurship activity in the category system of the theory of entrepreneurship”. Topical issues of economy sciences, no. 22-1, pp. 102-106. [In Russian]

17. Simonova E. V. 2015. “Entrepreneurial activity — the basis of innovation and economic development”. Economy and Society, no. 1-4 (14), pp. 601-603. [In Russian]

18. Shavel S. A., Martishchenkova E. V., Nazarova D. V. et al. 2019. Recommendations on the formation of instructions to self-fulfillment and consolidation of youth in the areas most affected by the Chernobyl disaster. Minsk: Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Belarus. 44 pp. [In Russian]

19. Shmunk D. Yu., Giltman M. A. 2021. “Employment of youth and older people in the labor market of the Tyumen region: analysis based on microdata”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 7, no. 3 (27), pp. 160-178. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2021-7-3-160-178 [In Russian]

20. Yadova M. A. 2021. “Young people in the age of the COVID-19 pandemic: the age-related benefits and limitations”. Siberian Socium, vol. 5, no. 2 (16), pp. 20-28. DOI: 10.21684/2587-8484-2021-5-2-20-28 [In Russian]