The rule of law and the independence of the Judiciary in the practice of the European Court of Human Rights

About the author:

Andrew Yu. Klyuchnikov, Cand. Sci. (Jur.), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (Lipetsk Branch); Judge, Lipetsk Pravoberezhniy District Court; andrew19871961@mail.ru

Abstract:

The article is devoted to the principle of the rule of law, implemented through the provisions of the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 1950. (Convention) by the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR). The relevance of studying this principle is due to the new approach formed by the Court that the rule of law is “inherent in all articles of the Convention.” We can see its application in the current case-law of the Court as one of the fundamental elements of the independence of national courts.

Thus, the author aims to identify the theoretical and practical aspects of the ECHR’s approach to the problem of judicial independence and legal application of the rule of law principle, to study the relevant Court practice. The rule of law and the independence of the judiciary as the basic elements of the convention system are an integral part of the institution of the “European public order” developed by the ECHR, therefore it is necessary to trace their interconnection.

The case-law of the ECHR served as the material for the study, which allowed us to identify all stages of the formation of the rule of law principle and its actual “content”. Analyzing judicial practice, along with using doctrinal approaches, we managed to identify the limits of permissible application of national laws, the powers of bodies and officials of various branches of government, bodies of the judicial community to the given problem, new aspects of the status of judges seen as one of the democratic values of society. To achieve this, the author used methods specific to studies of law and general scientific (traditional) research methods, with an emphasis on comparative and general legal methods, and the method of induction during the analysis of judicial practice.

The paper examines the normative sources of law and judicial practice of the ECHR, allowing to reveal the principle of the rule of law, its correlation with the principle of judicial independence, the specifics of its impact on the domestic national judicial system and the functioning of the state apparatus, to determine the role of the principle in the convention mechanism of the protection of human rights.

References:

1. Abrosimova E. B. 2010. “Judicial power: Contemporary constitutional representation”. Comparative constitutional review, no. 5 (78), pp. 96-117. [In Russian]

2. Bondar N. S. 2017. “The constitutional court in the system of jurisdictional bodies (of godly sins of constitutional justice)”. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, no. 1 (62), pp. 26-32. [In Russian]

3. Varlamova N. V. 2002. “Rule of law — basic principle of European human rights system”. Constitutional law: East-European review, no. 3 (40), pp. 151-178. [In Russian]

4. Hajiyev Kh. I. 2018. “Judicial legislation in international justice”. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, no. 3 (70), pp. 119-129. [In Russian]

5. Dedov D. I., Hajiyev Kh. I. 2021. “The Case ‘Molla Sali v. Greece’: The commentary on the judgment of the ECHR Grand Chamber”. Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 126-136. [In Russian]

6. Zybina O. S., Kolesnikova M. M. 2015. “On principle of independence of judges”. Saint Petersburg Law Academy Herald, no. 3 (28), pp. 54-58. [In Russian]

7. Klyuchnikov A. Yu. 2019. “ The role of general international law principles in the determination of law enforcement freedom of international courts”. Russian Judge, no. 6, pp. 61-64. [In Russian]

8. Klyuchnikov A. Yu. 2020. “Right to truth in international justice”. Lex Russica, no. 12 (169), pp. 106-117. [In Russian]

9. Marochkin S. Yu. 2013. “The rule of law on the domestic and international levels: the dynamics of development and interaction”. State and Law, no. 10, pp. 85-94. [In Russian]

10. Rudenko V. N. 2020. “Prospects of democracy in modern constitutionalism”. The Russian Academy of Sciences Herald, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 259-266. [In Russian]

11. Court of Justice of European Union. 2006. Court of Justice of European Union Decision of 19 September 2006 in case no. C-506-04 “Graham J. Wilson v. Ordre des avocats du barreau de Luxembourg”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/showPdf.jsf?text=&docid=64426&pageIndex=0&docl...

12. Court of Justice of European Union. 2019. Court of Justice of European Union Judgement of 24 June 2019 in case no. C-619/18 “Commission v Poland (Independence of the Supreme Court)”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://curia.europa.eu/juris/document/document.jsf?text=&docid=215341&pageIndex=0&a...

13. European Court of Human Rights. 1975. ECHR Decision of 12 February 1975 in case no. 4451/70 “Golder v. United Kingdom”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/rus?i=001-57496

14. European Court of Human Rights. 2020. ECHR Grand Chamber Judgement of 1 December 2020 in case no. 26374/18 “Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson v. Iceland”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206582

15. European Court of Human Rights. 2018. ECHR Grand Chamber Judgement of 11 December 2018 in case no. 36480/07 “Lekić v. Slovenia”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-188268

16. European Court of Human Rights. 2003. ECHR Grand Chamber Judgement of 13 February 2003 in case no. 41340/98 “Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and others v. Turkey”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-60936

17. European Court of Human Rights. 2010. ECHR Grand Chamber Judgement of 17 May 2010 in case no. 36376/04 “Kononov v. Latvia”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98669

18. European Court of Human Rights. 2020. ECHR Grand Chamber Judgement of 20 January 2020 in case no. 201/17 “Magyar Kétfarkú Kutya Párt v. Hungary”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-200657

19. European Court of Human Rights. 2016. ECHR Grand Chamber Judgement of 21 June 2016 in case no. 5809/08 “Al-Dulimi and Montana Management Inc. v. Switzerland”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164515

20. European Court of Human Rights. 2013. ECHR Grand Chamber Judgement of 21 October 2013 in case no. 42750/09 “Del Río Prada v. Spain”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-127697

21. European Court of Human Rights. 2020. ECHR Grand Chamber Judgement of 22 December 2020 in case no. 14305/17 “Selahattin Demirtaş v. Turkey”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207173

22. European Court of Human Rights. 2016. ECHR Grand Chamber Judgement of 23 June 2016 in case no. 20261/12 “Baka v. Hungary”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163113

23. European Court of Human Rights. 2018. ECHR Grand Chamber Judgement of 25 September 2018 in case no. 76639/11 “Denisov v. Ukraine”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186216

24. European Court of Human Rights. 2019. ECHR Grand Chamber Judgement of 29 May 2019 in case no. 15172/13 “Proceedings under Article 46 § 4 of the Convention in the case of Ilgar Mammadov v. Azerbaijan”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-193543

25. European Court of Human Rights. 2015. ECHR Grand Chamber Judgement of 4 December 2015 in case no. 47143/06 “Roman Zakharov v. Russia”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-159324

26. European Court of Human Rights. 2018. ECHR Grand Chamber Judgement of 6 November 2018 in case no. 55391/13 “Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187507

27. European Court of Human Rights. 2020. ECHR Judgement of 10 July 2020 in case no. 310/15 “Mugemangango v. Belgium”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-203885

28. European Court of Human Rights. 2020. ECHR Judgement of 14 January 2020 in case no. 10926/09 “Rinau v. Lithuania”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-200336

29. European Court of Human Rights. 2017. ECHR Judgement of 14 November 2017 in case no. 41226/09 “Işıkırık v. Turkey”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178506

30. European Court of Human Rights. 2020. ECHR Judgement of 15 December 2020 in case no. 33399/18 “Pişkin v. Turkey”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206901

31. European Court of Human Rights. 2019. ECHR Judgement of 16 April 2019 in case no. 12778/17 “Alparslan Altan v. Turkey”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-192804

32. European Court of Human Rights. 2017. ECHR Judgement of 19 December 2017 in case no. 78477/11 “Ramda v. France”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179793

33. European Court of Human Rights. 2016. ECHR Judgement of 20 December 2016 in case no. 14737/08 “Uspaskich v. Lithuania”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-169844

34. European Court of Human Rights. 2018. ECHR Judgement of 20 March 2018 in case no. 5310/71 “Ireland v. the United Kingdom”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181585

35. European Court of Human Rights. 2018. ECHR Judgement of 20 September 2018 in case no. 68762/14 and no. 71200/14 “Aliyev v. Azerbaijan”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186126

36. European Court of Human Rights. 2018. ECHR Judgement of 24 April 2018 in case no. 55385/14 “Baydar v. the Netherlands”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-182454

37. European Court of Human Rights. 2017. ECHR Judgement of 25 July 2017 in case no. 69997/10 and no. 74793/11 “Panorama Ltd and Miličić v. Bosnia and Herzegovina”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-175670

38. European Court of Human Rights. 2018. ECHR Judgement of 27 February 2018 in case no. 39496/11 “Sinkova v. Ukraine”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-181210

39. European Court of Human Rights. 2019. ECHR Judgement of 28 February 2019 in case no. 4755/16 “Beghal v. the United Kingdom”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-191276

40. European Court of Human Rights. 2017. ECHR Judgement of 31 January 2017 in case no. 38898/04 “Rozhkov v. Russia”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170590

41. European Court of Human Rights. 2011. ECHR Judgement of 6 October 2011 in case no. 23465/03 “Agrokompleks v. Ukraine”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106636

42. European Court of Human Rights. 2017. ECHR Judgement of 7 March 2017 in case no. 29994/02 “Döner and Others v. Turkey”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-171773

43. European Court of Human Rights. 2012. ECHR Judgement of 9 February 2012 in case no. 42856/06 “Kinský v. the Czech Republic”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-109044

44. European Court of Human Rights. 2013. ECHR Judgement of 9 January 2013 in case no. 21722/11 “Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine”. Accessed on 6 December 2021. https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115871

45. European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe. 1950. The European Convention on Human Rights. Strasbourg: European Court of Human Rights, Council of Europe. 63 pp.

46. United Nations. 1949. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights. New York: United Nations. 13 pp.