Release:
2021, Vol. 7. № 4 (28)About the authors:
Maria V. Batyreva, Cand. Sci. (Soc.), Associate Professor, Department of General and Economic Sociology, University of Tyumen; m.v.batyreva@utmn.ru; ORCID: 0000-0001-6588-5469Abstract:
In recent decades, the forms of social and political participation and interaction between authorities and citizens have expanded due to the development of modern information and communication technologies. According to most scientists, modern technologies will allow citizens to be heard by the authorities, as well as to actively participate in social and political processes. At the same time, the level of demand and the real use of smart technologies by citizens for socio-political activity, in our opinion, largely depend on the level of their information competence and civic-mindedness.
The purpose of this study is to assess the demand, analyze the nature and purpose of the use of modern digital services for social and political activity of the residents of the Tyumen region. The article is based on the sociological study conducted in the summer of 2021 through a questionnaire survey of the residents of cities and rural municipal districts in the south of the Tyumen region.
The article presents the results of a study on the level of digital competence of the region’s residents, their awareness of the existing “smart” technologies in the country and the region to manifest socio-political activity, as well as the demand for these technologies. The article also presents an analysis of the purpose of the use of electronic services and the specific nature of these forms of interaction between the authority and the population (political, non-political).
It was found out that electronic resources are used by 40% of the population to express their civic-mindedness, and they are more often used by respondents with a higher level of information competence. Most residents of the region are at lower levels of political participation, their interaction with the authorities is mainly limited to information sharing. The share of the population with a higher level of participation is small and is represented by members of political parties and public organizations.
Keywords:
References:
RBK. 2021. Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VTsIOM) noticed a decline in political activity to its lowest point in 17 years. Accessed on 11 November 2021. https://www.rbc.ru/politics/02/08/2021/61052d699a7947d73c58f35b [In Russian].
Sannikova T. D. 2018. “Digital inequality as a negative factor for the well-being of the rural population”. Science Herald, vol. 1, no. 6 (6), pp. 21-27. [In Russian].
Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VTsIOM). 2021. Social and political activity of Russians: Monitoring. Accessed on 11 November 2021. https://wciom.ru/analytical-reviews/analiticheskii-obzor/socialnaja-i-politicheskaja-aktivnost-rossi.... [In Russian].
Shinyaeva O. V., Poletaeva O. V., Slepova O. M. 2019. “Information and digital inequality: The search for effective practices of population adaptation”. Public opinion monitoring: Changes in economy and society, no. 4, pp. 68-85. [In Russian].
Albrechts L. 2002. “The planning community reflects on enhancing public involvement. Views from academics and reflective practitioners”. Planning Theory and Practice, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 331-347.
Arnstein S. R. 1969. “A ladder of citizen participation”. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, vol. 35 (4), pp. 216-224.
Batyreva M., Karagulian E. 2021. “Perception of smart city technologies by citizens of Tyumen Region”. European Proceedings of Social and Behavioural Sciences EpSBS, pp. 416-425.
Dacombe R., Parvin P. 2021. “Participatory democracy in an age of inequality”. Representation, vol. 57 (2), pp. 145-157.
Dacombe R. 2021. “Doing democracy differently: How can participatory democracy take hold in deprived areas?” Representation, vol. 57 (2), pp. 175-191.
Goatcher J. 2005. “Carole Pateman and the nature of a participatory society”. Contemporary Politics, vol. 11, iss. 4, pp. 217–234.
Heywood A. 2013. Politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. 560 рp.
Pateman C. 2012. “Participatory democracy revisited”. Perspectives on Politics, vol. 10, iss. 1, pp. 7-19.
Pateman C. 2002. “Self-ownership and property in the person: Democratization and a tale of two concepts”. Journal of Political Philosophy, vol. 10 (1), pp. 20-53.
Theocharis Y., Van Deth J. 2018. “The continuous expansion of citizen participation: A new taxonomy”. European Political Science Review, no. 10 (1), pp. 139-163.
Van Deth J. W. 2014. “A conceptual map of political participation”. Acta Politica, vol. 49 (3), pp. 349-367.
Verba S, Nie N. 1975. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row. 428 pр.
