Party and independent-individual representation in the mechanism of ensuring the democratic mandate of the popular trust in a constitutional state

Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research


Release:

2020, Vol. 6. № 4 (24)

Title: 
Party and independent-individual representation in the mechanism of ensuring the democratic mandate of the popular trust in a constitutional state


For citation: Gutorova A. N. 2020. “Party and independent-individual representation in the mechanism of ensuring the democratic mandate of the popular trust in a constitutional state”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 6, no. 4 (24). pp. 248-264. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2020-6-4-248-264

About the author:

Alla N. Gutorova, Cand. Sci. (Jur), Associate Professor, Department of Constitutional Law, Southwest State University (Kursk); allagutorova@mail.ru; ORCID: 0000-0003-0345-6903; SPIN: 2021-0929

Abstract:

The party system in contemporary Russia has a number of features that should be taken into account in the course of the legal research and search for the optimal correlation of party and independent (individual) representation in the constitutional mechanism of the popular trust mandate. In our opinion, it is the features of the Russian party system at the present stage of its historical development, not multiparty as such, that determine the main vector of constitutional-legal regulation of these public relations and the relevant assessment of this phenomenon in Russian legal science.

The research methodology is based on a comparative legal method that allowed the comparison of party and independent representation in the popular representation system. The use of the historical and legal method is determined by the need to identify the features of the development of the party system in modern Russia through the prism of historical facts. The forecasting method has allowed determining the prospects of further development of the Russian political system.

The constitutional system of the Russian Federation over the past decades has demonstrated a very decisive rejection of the one-party ideological system and the transition to the nascent but steadily developing multiparty system. As the real multiparty system and political competition become stronger, the individual-independent form of popular representation will give way to the party mandate of popular trust until the institution of “independent” single-member deputies becomes a thing of the past, not only in the State Duma, but also in the legislative (representative) bodies of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. “Independent-individual” national representation is more preferably for the local government, that is non-partisan national representation (in the general federal sense). By its constitutional and legal nature, the municipal popular representation is “independent and individual” in relation to political parties.

References:

  1. Avakyan S. A. 2014. “Democracy as a set of institutions of direct and representative democracy: problems of efficiency”. Russian State Science, no. 2, pp. 11-17. [In Russian]

  2. Akmatova Zh. Sh. 2016 “Basic theoretical approaches in determining the role and functions of political parties’. Bulletin of the Osh State University, no. 1, pp. 266‑269. [In Russian]

  3. Astafichev P. A. 2014. “Democracy as the basis of the doctrine of constitutionalism and the constitutional system of the modern state”. Constitutional and Municipal Law, no. 7, pp. 19-23. [In Russian]

  4. Astafichev P. A. 2018. “Representative democracy in Russia: 25 years under the conditions of the 1993 Constitution of the Russian Federation”. Bulletin of the Volga Institute of Management, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 6-15. [In Russian]

  5. Achkasov V. A. 2012. “Members of parliament: ‘representatives of the people’ or ‘guides of the will of the parties’?”. In: Power Structures and Dominance Groups, pp. 243-252. Moscow. [In Russian]

  6. Dubinina E. N. 2016 “Modern civil society and the state apparatus: principles of interaction”. In: Theoretical-Legal and Cultural-Historical Problems of the Relationship between the Internal Affairs Bodies and Civil Society. Moscow. 246 pp. [In Russian]

  7. Erygina V. I. 2009. “Some aspects of public legal responsibility of political parties as participants in the electoral process”. State and Law, no. 11, pp. 37-44. [In Russian]

  8. RF Constitutional Court Conclusion of 16 March 2020 No. 1-Z “On compliance with the provisions of Chapters 1, 2 and 9 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation of the provisions of the Law of the Russian Federation on the amendment to the Constitution of the Russian Federation ‘On improving regulation of certain issues of organization and functioning public authority’, as well as the compliance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation of the procedure for the entry into force of Article 1 of this Law in connection with the request of the President of the Russian Federation”. Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF, no. 12, art. 1855. [In Russian]

  9. Izmailova E. A. 2010. “Party, deputy, faction: problems of parliamentary relations”. Modern Law, no. 3, pp. 13-16. [In Russian]

  10. Kochkarova E. A. 2012. “Functions, goals, rights and obligations of political parties”. Science and New Technologies, no. 8, p. 166-169. [In Russian]

  11. Makmenamin I., Gwiazda A. 2014. “Three ways of institutionalization: voices, positions and political course when changing parties in Poland”. Political Science, no. 3, pp. 103‑134. [In Russian]

  12. Nikonenko S. A. 2011. “On the issue of legislative regulation of the participation of parties in the elections of deputies of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation”. Bulletin of the Tambov University. Series: Humanities, no. 9, pp. 311-315. [In Russian]

  13. RF Constitutional Court Resolution of 11 March 2008 No. 4-P “In the case of checking the constitutionality of subparagraph ‘l’ of the paragraph 25 of the Article 38 of the RF Federal Law ‘On basic guarantees of electoral rights and the right to participate in a referendum of citizens of the Russian Federation’ and paragraph 10 of part 9 of article 41 of the Law of the Vologda Region ‘On elections of deputies to the Legislative Assembly of the Vologda Region’ in connection with the complaint of the public association ‘Political party “Union of Right Forces”’”. Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF, no. 11, art. 1073. [In Russian]

  14. RF Constitutional Court Resolution of 9 November 2009 No. 16-P “In the case of checking the constitutionality of paragraph 32 of Article 38 of the RF Federal Law ‘On the Basic Guarantees of Electoral Rights and the Right to Participate in a Referendum of Citizens of the Russian Federation’, subparagraph ‘k’ of the paragraph 2 of the article 21 of the Federal Law ‘On Political Parties’, part 3 of the article 30 of the Law of the Krasnodar Territory ‘On the election of deputies to the Legislative Assembly of the Krasnodar Territory’ and part one of article 259 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in connection with the complaint of citizen V. Z. Izmailov”. Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF, no. 47, art. 5709. [In Russian]

  15. RF Constitutional Court Resolution of 22 April 2013 No. 8-P “In the case of checking the constitutionality of Articles 3, 4, paragraph 1 of part one of Article 134, Article 220, part one of Article 259, part two of Article 333 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, subparagraph ‘h’ of paragraph 9 of Article 30, paragraph 10 of Article 75, paragraphs 2 and 3 of Article 77 of the RF Federal Law ‘On the Basic Guarantees of Electoral Rights and the Right to Participate in a Referendum of Citizens of the Russian Federation’, Parts 4 and 5 of Article 92 of the RF Federal Law ‘On the election of deputies of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation’ in connection with the complaints of citizens A. V. Andronova, O. O. Andronova, O. B. Belov and others, the Commissioner for Human Rights in the Russian Federation and the regional branch of the political party ‘Fair Russia” in the Voronezh Region’”. Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF, no. 8, art. 2292. [In Russian]

  16. Rastimehina T. V., Epifanov A. S. 2017. “Political parties: basic approaches to the definition of the concept, nature and functions”. Economic and Social-Humanitarian Studies, no. 1, pp. 148-158. [In Russian]

  17. Tev D. B. 2012. “Parties of the ‘second echelon’ in regional parliaments: peculiarities of the pool for recruiting deputies of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation, Fair Russia and the Liberal Democratic Party”. Bulletin of Perm University. Political science, no. 1, pp. 98-111. [In Russian]

  18. Tolpygina O. A. 2015. “Transformation of the ideological function of political parties in modern Russia”. Political Science, no. 1, pp. 157-171. [In Russian]

  19. Chernev A. 2003. “On the role and functions of the ruling party in the system of Soviet public administration”. Safety of Eurasia, no. 4, pp. 631-656. [In Russian]

  20. RF Federal Law of 11 July 2001 No. 95-FZ (with subsequent amendments) “On political parties”. Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF, no. 29, art. 2950. [In Russian]

  21. RF Federal Law of 12 June 2002 No. 67-FZ (with subsequent amendments) “On the basic guarantees of electoral rights and the right to participate in a referendum of citizens of the Russian Federation”. Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF, no. 24, art. 2253. [In Russian]