Problems of labor legislation: Kyrgyzstan under COVID-19 pandemic (comparative analysis with the Russian legal regulations)

Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research


Release:

2020, Vol. 6. № 4 (24)

Title: 
Problems of labor legislation: Kyrgyzstan under COVID-19 pandemic (comparative analysis with the Russian legal regulations)


For citation: Ramankulov K. S. 2020. “Problems of labor legislation: Kyrgyzstan under COVID-19 pandemic (comparative analysis with the Russian legal regulations)”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 6, no. 4 (24), pp. 214-227. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2020-6-4-214-227

About the author:

Kubanychbek S. Ramankulov, Cand. Sci. (Jur.), Professor, Head of Department of Civil, Labor and Environmental Law, Legal Faculty, Kyrgyz National University named after Balasagyn (Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan); ramaks65knu@mail.ru

Abstract:

The situation caused by the spread of COVID-19 has become one of the serious challenges that have manifested themselves, in particular, in the field of legal regulation of social and labor relations, which continues to remain insufficiently studied. This article aims to fill in this lacuna and consider the effectiveness of the main institutions of labor legislation in the event of a coronavirus pandemic.

The performed analysis allowed rationalizing a significant addition and clarification of the conceptual apparatus of the labor legislation of the Kyrgyz Republic (KR), which is used in labor regulation under COVID-19 conditions. At the same time, the results show that the lack of a number of basic norms in the legislation, in fact, prevent from establishing the legal status of persons in the labor sphere who are in restrictive/quarantine conditions. An analysis of the basic norms related to the institutions of labor legislation showed a clear insufficiency of their legal capacity to regulate labor relations in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

For the first time, on the basis of the comparative legal method, the problem of establishing new rules outside the labor legislation in Russia and Kyrgyzstan was identified, when the regulation of labor and relations directly related to them in both countries in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic moved to the sectoral (departmental) and local levels, including through acts of application of law (in Kyrgyzstan). Everywhere during the pandemic, employers in both countries transferred to remote work, which is not provided for by labor legislation. The author justifies the prospect of the proposal to subsequently separate out individual chapters in the labor codes of Russia and Kyrgyzstan, which provide for the specifics of labor regulation in an emergency (provisions).

The main methods used in the article are the means of system analysis and the comparative legal method for studying the problems of labor legislation in Kyrgyzstan and Russia in terms of analyzing its current state and ensuring effective implementation in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic.

References:

  1. Andreev P., Loktyukhina N. “Pandemic as a challenge to traditional forms of employment”. Advokatskaya Gazeta. Accessed 7 December 2020. https://www.advgazeta.ru/mneniya/pandemiya-kak-vyzov-traditsionnym-formam-zanyatosti-/ [In Russian]

  2. Golovina S. 2020. “Coronavirus pandemic infection (COVID-19) as a new challenge to labor law”. Labor Law in Russia and Abroad, no. 3, pp. 3-8. [In Russian]

  3. Gorbacheva K. “Legal basis of self-isolation regime: comments of an expert”. Real Time. Accessed 7 December 2020. https://realnoevremya.ru/articles/170518-samoizolyaciya-i-zakonodatelstvo-rossii [In Russian]

  4. ILO Convention No. 187 on the Basis for Promoting Occupational Safety and Health (2006). Official website of the International Labor Organization. Accessed 07.12.2020. https://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_norm/---normes/documents/normativeinstrument/wcms_c18... [In Russian]

  5. Korablina O. V. 2020. “Actual problems of transferring workers to remote working’. Labor Law in Russia and Abroad, no. 3, pp. 12-14. [In Russian]

  6. Miav Tian Tan. “Labor Organization in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Guide for Employers”. Geneva: International Labor Organization. 33 pp. [In Russian]

  7. Murtonen M. 2011. Risk Assessment in the Workplace: A Practical Guide. Series Occupational Safety and Health: International Experience. Vol. 1. Finland’s Experience. Moscow: International Labor Organization. 64 pp. [In Russian]

  8. Kyrgyz Republic Tax Code of 17 November 2008 No. 230. Official website of the Ministry of Justice of the Kyrgyz Republic. Accessed 7 December 2020. http://cbd.minjust.gov.kg/act/view/ru-ru/202445 [In Russian]

  9. RF Ministry of Labor Letter of 26 March 2020 No. 14-4/10/P-2696 with Supplement: Recommendations for workers and employers in connection with the Presidential Decree of 25 March 2020 No. 206 “On the announcement in the Russian Federation of non-working days”. Official website of the Ministry of Labor and Social Protection of the Russian Federation. Accessed 07 December 2020. https://www.v2b.ru/documents/pismo-mintruda-rf-ot-26-03-2020-14-4-10-p-2696/ [In Russian]

  10. Kyrgyz Republic Government Decree of 8 May 2020 No. 241 “On measures to implement the Law of the Kyrgyz Republic ‘On amendments to some legislative acts of the Kyrgyz Republic on stabilizing the socio-economic situation in connection with force majeure circumstances’”. Official website of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic. Accessed 7 December 2020. https://www.gov.kg/ru/npa/s/2438 [In Russian]

  11. Kyrgyz Republic Supreme Court Plenum Resolution of 28 November 2013 No. 11 “On judicial practice in cases of reinstatement at work”. Bulletin of the Supreme Court of the Kyrgyz Republic. 2014. No. 1, pp. 20. [In Russian]

  12. RF Supreme Court Plenum Resolution of 17 March 2004 No. 2 “On the application by the courts of the Russian Federation of the Labor Code of the Russian Federation” (art. 23 p. “v”). Rossiyskaya Gazeta, no. 3449. Accessed 7 December 2020. https://rg.ru/2004/04/08/kodeks-dok.html [In Russian]

  13. Fergana.agency. “Medical workers union of Kyrgyzstan stated about underpayment for COVID-19 infection”. Accessed 7 December 2020. https://fergana.news/news/120231/ [In Russian]

  14. 24.kg. “The Trade Union of Medical Workers: doctors and nurses have not received the promised payments”. Accessed 7 December 2020. https://24.kg/obschestvo/159746_profsoyuz_medrabotnikov_obeschannyie_vyiplatyi_vrachi_imedsestryi_ta... [In Russian]

  15. Ramankulov K. S. 2019. “Problems of the labor legislation of the Kyrgyz Republic in the context of contemporary reforms and international labor standards”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 103-120. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2019-5-1-103-120 [In Russian]

  16. Kyrgyz Republic Government Order of 27 April 2020 No. 147-p. Official website of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic. Accessed 7 December 2020. https://www.gov.kg/ru/npa/s/2415 [In Russian]

  17. Kyrgyz Republic Government Decree of 4 May 2020 No. 161-r “On establishment of lump sum monetary compensation”. Official website of the Government of the Kyrgyz Republic. Accessed 7 December 2020. https://online.zakon.kz/m/Document/?doc_id=37904142 [In Russian]

  18. ILO. “Manual on Occupational Safety and Health Management Systems (ILO-OSH 2001)”. Official website of the International Labor Organization. Accessed 7 December 2020. https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/safety-and-health-at-work/normative-instruments/WCMS_125017/lang--... [In Russian]

  19. Chernykh N. V. 2020. “Russian labor legislation vs. coronavirus: who will win?”. Actual Problems of Russian Law, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 151-159. [In Russian]

  20. Schmidt T. N. 2014. “Extraordinary legal regulation: general theoretical research”. Cand. Sci. (Jur.) diss. Barnaul. 191 pp. [In Russian]