Release:
2020, Vol. 6. № 3 (23)About the authors:
Anna P. Kireenko, Dr. Sci. (Econ.), Professor, First Vice-Rector, Baikal State University (Irkutsk); sw.tpk.rt@mail.ru; ORCID: 0000-0002-7860-5929Abstract:
This article deals with the history and current practice of handling the value added tax (VAT). The authors have analyzed the main advantages and disadvantages of VAT: the prevailing negative impact on the cash flows of VAT payers; the complexity of the tax, which increases the costs of its collection from the state and from taxpayers; the low ratio of actual VAT income to potential; the inability to prevent certain types of tax fraud.
The authors explain their thesis that the prospects for the VAT development are connected, firstly, with overcoming the inherent tax deficiencies, and secondly, with the transformation of tax under the influence of the external environment. This article studies the directions of tax transformation and the objective prerequisites for applying a single standard tax rate to a wide tax base. The data on the structural transformation of the economy in developed countries and Russia and its impact on VAT are analyzed. Particular attention is paid to the alternative tax collection practices: reverse payment mechanism, split-payment mechanisms, and single window method. The experience of using tax lotteries as a method of increasing the collection of value added tax is analyzed in detail. The considered mechanisms for collecting VAT effectively reduce tax evasion arising from the overestimation of VAT deductions, but can not deal with the concealment of income.
All the new methods are associated with an increase in the costs of tax administration and approval, require an increase in reporting for taxpayers, introduce new responsibilities for the exchange of data with tax authorities, including the transfer of accounting data and invoice information (including in real time). The reverse payment mechanism and the split payment method, change the nature of VAT collection, canceling fractional payments, which are usually considered as the main advantage of VAT.
Keywords:
References:
Amand C., Boucquez K. 2011. “A new defence for victims of EU missing‑trader fraud?”. International VAT Monitor, no. 22, pp. 234-241.
European Commission. 2017. “Analysis of the impact of the split payment mechanism as an alternative VAT collection method, Final Report”. December. https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/ files/split_payment_report2017_en.pdf
Benge M., Pallot M., Slack H. 2013. “Possible lessons for the United States from New Zealand’s GST”. National Tax Journal, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 479-498.
Cevik S. et al. 2019. “Structural transformation and tax efficiency”. International Finance, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 341-379.
Charlet A., Owens J. 2010. “An international perspective on VAT”. Tax Notes International, vol. 59, no. 12, pp. 943-954.
Cnossen S. 2010. “Value added taxes and excises: commentary”. In: Mirrlees J. et al. (eds.). Dimensions of Tax Design: The Mirrlees Review, pp. 370-386. Oxford: Oxford University Press for Institute for Fiscal Studies.
OECDilabrary. “Consumption Tax Trends 2018. VAT/GST and Excise Rates, Trends and Policy Issues”. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/taxation/consumption-tax-trends-2018/countries-with-vat-1960-2018_ctt-...
Dickson I., White D. 2008. “Tax design insights from the New Zealand Goods and Services Tax (GST) model”. Victoria University of Wellington CAGTR Working Paper Series, Working Paper No. 60.
Fooken J., Hemmelgarn T., Herrmann B. 2014. “Improving VAT compliance — random awards for tax compliance”. Taxation Papers, Working Paper No. 51. https://ideas.repec.org/p/tax/taxpap/0051.html
Gupta S., Keen M., Shah A., Verdier G. 2017. “Digital revolutions in public finance”. International Monetary Fund. https://www.elibrary.imf.org/view/IMF071/24304-9781484315224/24304-9781484315224/Other_formats/Sourc...
Owens J., Battiau P., Charlet A. “VAT’s next half century: towards a single-rate system?”. OECD Observer. http://oecdobserver.org/news/fullstory.php/aid/3509/VAT_s_next_half_century:_Towards_a_single-rate_s...
Pashev K. V. 2007. “Countering cross-border VAT fraud: the Bulgarian experience”. Journal of Financial Crime, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 490-501.
European Commission. 2016. “Proposal for a council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax as regards the temporary application of a generalised reverse charge mechanism in relation to supplies of goods and services above a certain threshold”. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52016PC0811&rid=3
Proposal for Council Directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC as regards the introduction of the detailed technical measures for the operation of the definitive VAT system for the taxation of trade between Member States. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52018PC0329&rid=2
Rogoff K. S. 2016. The Curse of Cash. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. 248 pp.
World Bank national accounts data, and OECD National Accounts data files. “Services, value added (% of GDP)”. https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NV.SRV.TOTL.ZS
OECD. 2019. “Tax Policy Reforms 2019: OECD and Selected Partner Economies”. Paris: OECD Publishing. DOI: 10.1787/da56c295-en
European Commission Information. “VAT for Online Businesses”. https://ec.europa.eu/taxation_customs/sites/taxation/files/vat-e-commerce-factsheet.pdf
Wells S. C., Flesher T. K. 1999. “Lessons for policy makers from the history of consumption taxes”. Accounting Historians Journal, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 103-126.
Zídková H., Šťastná A. 2019. “VAT Collection Methods”. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 883-895.
