Broadening the powers of federal labor inspection: the issues of legal validity and effectiveness

Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research


Release:

2020, Vol. 6. № 3 (23)

Title: 
Broadening the powers of federal labor inspection: the issues of legal validity and effectiveness


For citation: Mitraysova A. S., Kuchevasova O. S. 2020. “Broadening the powers of federal labor inspection: the issues of legal validity and effectiveness”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 6, no. 3 (23), pp. 233-247. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2020-6-3-233-247

About the authors:

Angelina S. Mitraysova, State Labor Inspector, State Labor Inspectorate in the Tyumen Region; angelina9657@yandex.ru 

Oksana S. Kuchevasova, Master Student, University of Tyumen; sevrygina@mail.ru

Abstract:

The right to remuneration for work is protected not only with the national sources of law (first of all, the Constitution of the Russian Federation), but also with international acts, which emphasize its special significance. The functions of protecting the right to remuneration for work are assigned to a wide variety of structures, including the Prosecutor’s office, courts, and labor dispute commissions. A separate place is assigned to the state labor inspectorates, which are authorized to carry out supervision and control functions for compliance with labor legislation.

At the end of 2019, with the adoption of appropriate legislative changes, the powers of state labor inspections were expanded. The new powers included the functions of organizing and carrying out activities aimed at preventing violations of labor laws and other regulatory legal acts containing labor law norms, as well as the functions to enforce the employer’s obligation to pay payments that were accrued to the employee, but were paid in fixed time.

In this article, the authors consider the proposed legislative changes, identify the shortcomings of legal regulation, and suggest possible ways to eliminate them, improve the regulatory framework in order to improve the effectiveness of the implementation of state labor inspections of their powers and protect the violated rights of employees.

The research methodology is based on a dialectical method that revealed some contradictions in the legal regulation and practice of state labor inspections. Due to the comparative method (when comparing the institution of a court order and a decision on enforcement), shortcomings were identified in the effectiveness of the implementation by the state labor inspections of the power to enforce the employer’s obligation to pay accrued but unpaid wages and other amounts within the framework of labor relations.

References:

  1. Barbashova T. P. 2008. “State supervision and control over the observance of labor rights of employees”. Cand. Sci. (Jur.) diss. abstract. Moscow. 28 pp. [In Russian]

  2. Bozhko A. P. Kavkaeva Yu. A., RudnevaYu. V., Fadeev E. V. 2019. “Some of the challenges of the orders proceeding”. Vestnik Volzhskogo universiteta im. V. N. Tatishcheva, no. 1, pp. 150-162. [In Russian]

  3. Kirichenko S. V., Shumilina A. B. 2016. “Transformation of mechanisms for supervision and control over compliance with acts containing labor law Norms”. Yurist- Pravoved, no. 2 (76), pp. 88-92. [In Russian]

  4. International Labour Organization. 1947. “Labour Inspection Convention (Convention No. 81)”. http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_120804/ [In Russian]

  5. Kudrin A. S. 2019. “On the question of the effectiveness of state bodies in protecting labor rights and freedoms”. Trudovoe pravo v Rossi i zarubezhom, no. 2, pp. 46-49. [In Russian]

  6. Lyutov N. L. 2019. “Labor inspections in post-Soviet States: degradation for the sake of the myth of economic efficiency?”. Aktualnye problemy rossiyskogo prava, no. 12 (109), pp. 92-106. [In Russian]

  7. RF Federal Service for Labor and Employment Official Website. https://rostrud.gov.ru/ [In Russian]

  8. RF State Duma Official Website. http://duma.gov.ru/ [In Russian]

  9. RF Federal Service for Labour and Employment Order of 18 December 2019 No. 357 “On the approval of the program of preventive measures aimed at preventing violations of mandatory requirements, compliance with which is evaluated by the Federal Service for Labour and Employment when conducting measures for Federal state supervision of compliance with labor legislation and other regulatory legal acts containing labor law norms, for 2020”.[In Russian]

  10. RF Government Decree of 5 June 2015 No. 1028-r. In: Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF, no. 24, art. 3508. [In Russian]

  11. Sapfirova A. A. 2015. “Legal basis for interaction between the Federal Labor Inspectorate and employees and employers”. Sovremennaya nauchnaya mysl, no. 5, pp. 167-178. [In Russian]

  12. Sapfirova A. A. 2016. Protection of Labor Rights of Employees by the Federal Labor Inspectorate. Moscow: Prospekt. 144 pp. [In Russian]

  13. RF Federal Service for Labor and Employment. 2019. Labor and Employment in Russia. 2019: Data Book. Moscow. 135 pp. [In Russian]

  14. RF Labor Code of 30 December 2001 No. 197-FZ (as of 31 July 2020). In: Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF, no. 1 (pt. 1), art. 3. [In Russian]

  15. RF Federal Law of 2 October 2007 No. 229-FZ (as of 31 July 2020) “On the enforcement proceedings”. In: Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF, no. 41, art. 4849. [In Russian]

  16. RF Federal Law of 2 December 2019 No. 393-FZ “On the modification of the Labor code of the Russian Federation concerning compulsory execution of the employer’s obligation to pay wages and other amounts due to the employee”. In: Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF, no. 49, art. 6952. [In Russian]

  17. RF Federal Law of 2 December 2019 No. 402-FZ “On amendments to the Federal law ‘On enforcement proceedings’”. In: Sobranie zakonodatelstva RF, no. 49, art. 6961. [In Russian]

  18. Shadrina T. 2018. “Forced recovery of unpaid wages by the decision of the GIT: prospects”. Avtonomnye uchrezhdeniya: bukhgalterski yuchet i nalogooblozhenie, no. 5. [In Russian] https://www.audar-press.ru/vzyskanie-nevyplachennoy-zarplaty

  19. Shaykhutdinova G. F., Okhotnikova L. V. 2014. “Foreign experience in training entrepreneurs”. Vestnik Irkutskogo gosudarstvennogo tekhnicheskogo universiteta, no. 12, pp. 459-462.

  20. Shakiryanov R. V. 2012. “Effect of the principle of procedural economy in civil proceedings”. Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa, no. 4, pp. 46-67. [In Russian]

  21. Shpak V. V. 2016. “Optimization of ordered Production”. Evraziyskaya advokatura, no. 6, pp. 60-63. [In Russian]