Release:
2020, Vol. 6. № 2 (22)About the authors:
Elena F. Gladun, Cand. Sci. (Jur.), Professor, Department of State and Municipal Administration, University of Tyumen; efgladun@yandex.ru; ORCID: 0000-0003-2525-6638Abstract:
Developing democracy institutions and citizen participation in state affairs, the world community focuses on postcolonial studies, which allow us to identify new perspectives, set new priorities in various areas, in law and public administration among others. In Arctic countries, postcolonial discourse has an impact on the methodology of research related to indigenous issues, and this makes possible to understand specific picture of the world and ideas about what is happening in the world. Moreover, the traditions of Russian state and governance are specific and interaction between indigenous peoples and public authorities should be studied with a special research methodology which would reflect the peculiarities of domestic public law and aimed at solving legal issue and enrich public policy. The objective of the paper is to present a new integrated methodology that includes a system of philosophical, anthropological, socio-psychological methods, as well as methods of comparative analysis and scenario development methods to involve peripheral communities into decision-making process of planning the socio-economic development in one of Russia’s Arctic regions — the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District and to justify and further legislatively consolidate the optimal forms of interaction between public authorities and indigenous communities of the North. In 2020, the Arctic Research Center conducted a sociological survey in the Shuryshkararea of the Yamal-Nenets Autonomous District, which seems to limit existing approaches to identifying public opinion about prospects for developing villages and organizing life of their residents. Our proposed methodology for taking into account the views of indigenous peoples can help to overcome the identified limitations.
Keywords:
References:
Balandier Zh. 2001. Political Anthropology. Moscow: Nauchnyj mir. 204 pp. [In Russian]
Bocharov V. V. 2001. “Political Anthropology”. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 37-67. [In Russian]
Voldina T. V. 2016. “Long life Eternal Dance”: Reincarnation in The Context of The Mythological Traditions of The Ob Ugrians. Part I. Tyumen: Format. 206 pp. [In Russian]
Vorobyov D. V. 2018. “Ethnozoology or human interaction with the world of fauna?”. Etnograficheskoe Obozrenie, no. 4, pp. 5-13. DOI: 10.31857/S086954150000195-4 [In Russian]
Gogolev P. V. 2014. Constitutional and legal foundations of paternalism and partnership regarding indigenous peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East of Russia: abstract. dis. doctors of law. Moscow State University named after M.V. Lomonosov. Moscow, 50 pp. [In Russian]
Gogolev P. V., Mayakunov A. E. 2017. National Policy and Contradictions of Ethnic Discourse in The Constitutional and Legal Policy of Russia. In: Sat scientific articles based on the materials of the All-Russian scientific-practical conference “Interpretation of legal acts (theoretical, legal, constitutional, civil and labor aspects)”. Simferopol: Arial. 148 pp.
Golovnev A.V. 1995. Speaking Cultures. Ekaterinburg: Ural Branch of RAS. 607 pp. [In Russian]
De Castro E. V. 2017. Cannibal Metaphysics. Frontiers of Post Structural Anthropology. Moscow: Ad Marginem. 200 pp. [In Russian]
Kovler A. I. Anthropology of Law. Moscow: Izdatelstvo NORMA. 480 pp. [In Russian]
Kon E. 2018. How forests think: towards anthropology on the other side of man. Moscow: Ad Marginem, 344 pp. [In Russian]
Kostogryzov P. I. 2017. “The constitutionalization of legal pluralism in Latin American countries: a comparative analysis of national models”. Constitutional and municipal law, no. 11, pp. 73-76. [In Russian]
Kradin N. N. 2002. Power in traditional society. Sociological Journal, no. 4, pp. 46-60. [In Russian]
Novikova N. I. (ed). 2008. People of The North (rights to resources and expertise). Legal Anthropology Studies. Moscow. 512 pp. [In Russian]
Novikova N. I. 2013. Customary law in Russian legislation: current opportunities and prospects for the protection of the rights of indigenous peoples. The current state and development paths of the indigenous peoples of the North, Siberia and the Far East of the Russian Federation. Shtyrova V. A. (ed.). Council of the Federation, 2012, 2nd edition, Moscow. 362 pp. [In Russian]
On approval of the Spatial Development Strategy of the Russian Federation for the period until 2025: Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of February 13, 2019 No. 207-r. Collection of legislation of the Russian Federation. 2019. No. 7. Art. 702. [In Russian]
Novikova N. I. (ed.). 2003. Reindeer Is Always Right. Research on Legal Anthropology. Moscow: Strategiya. 320 pp. [In Russian]
2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Accessed on 10 February 2019. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/ru/about/development-agenda/ [In Russian]
Popova V. A. (ed.). 2012. Early Forms of Political Systems. SPb .: Russian Academy of Sciences, Museum of Anthropology and Ethnography Peter the Great. 388 pp. [In Russian]
Rulan N. 2000. Legal Anthropology. Moscow: Norma. 310 pp. [In Russian]
Tishkov V. A. 2001. “New political anthropology”. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 68-74. [In Russian]
Filippova N. A. 2020. The law of indigenous peoples: development prospects in the development of the Arctic. Arctic: society, science and law: collection of articles. Kharlampyeva N. K. (ed.). SPb.: Saint Petersburg State University. 542 pp. [In Russian]
Khaknazarov S. H. 2016. Problems of socio-economic development of territories of traditional nature management of indigenous peoples of the Khanty-Mansi Autonomous Okrug-Ugra (based on sociological research). Khanty-Mansiysk: Ugra format. 100 pp. [In Russian]
Chebotarev G. N., Gladun E. F. 2015. “Co-management of the indigenous peoples of the North by the Arctic territories during their industrial development”. Journal of Russian Law, no. 5, pp. 48-58. [In Russian]
Bhabha H. K. 1994. The location of culture. London and New York: Routledge. 440 pp.
Castells M. 2009. Communication power. Oxford : Oxford university press. 592 pp.
Castro-Gomez S. 2005. The Hubris of the Zero Point: Science, Race and Illustration in New Granada. Bogota: Editorial Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, pp.1750-1816.
De Castro E.V. 2016. The Relative Native: Essays on Indigenous Conceptual Worlds. Hau Books Chicago. 366 pp.
Dussel E. 1995. Europocentrism and Modernity (Introduction to the Frankfurt Lectures). In The Postmodern Debate in Latin America, ed. by Beverley J., Oviedo J., Aronna M. Durham: Duke University Press, pp. 65-76.
Dussel E. 1985. Philosophy of liberation. Orbis Books, Maryknoll. 224 pp.
Hardt M., Negri A. 2009. Commonwealth. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 448 pp.
Holbraad M., Pedersen M. A. 2017. The Ontological Turn and Anthropological exposition Cambridge University Press. 352 pp.
Huntington S. 1996. The clash of civilizations and the remaking of world order. New York: Touchstone book. 368 pp.
Kopenawa D., Albert B. 2013. The Falling Sky. Words of a Yanomami Shaman. London, England: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 622 pp.
Tlostanova M. 2017. On decolonizing design. Design Philosophy Papers, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 51-61. 10.1080/14487136.2017.1301017
Tlostanova M., Mignolo W. 2009. On Pluritopic Hermeneutics, Trans-modern thinking, and Decolonial philosophy. Encounters, vol. 1, no. 1. pp.11-27.
Wallerstein I., Lemert Ch., Rojas C. A. 2013. Uncertain worlds: world-systems analysis in changing times. Herndon: Paradigm Pub. 235 pp.
