VAT and its influence on Russian macroindicators

Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research


Release:

2020, Vol. 6. № 1 (21)

Title: 
VAT and its influence on Russian macroindicators


For citation: Koroleva L. P. 2020. “VAT and its influence on Russian macroindicators”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 6, no. 1 (21), pp. 199-215. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2020-6-1-199-215

About the author:

Lyudmila P. Koroleva, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Department of Theoretical Economics and Economic Security, National Research Mordovia State University; korol.l@mail.ru, ORCID: 0000-0002-8375-8524

Abstract:

The importance of this research links to the controversial discussion about the role of the value-added tax (VAT) in the sphere of macroeconomic regulation. The assumption of its neutral influence on economic growth has led to increasing VAT rate in Russia from 18% to 20%. However, the reduction of consumer expenditures, revenues, and profits is a possible negative effect. In addition, people criticize the mechanism of VAT refund for the absence of any impact on export and investment. Thus, the goal of this research lies in verifying the most popular visions on VAT’s influence on Russian macroindicators.

The methodology of the research comes from the concepts recognizing taxes as an effective tool. The author applies general scientific and econometric methods (correlation, analysis of variance, and regression analysis) using MS Excel.

The author formulates four hypotheses that have shown stable views about VAT’s influence on macroeconomy. They have been tested via six equations of linear regression; the significance of the equations has been estimated via the coefficient of determination, Fisher criterion, the average error of approximation; the significance of the coefficients d — via p-value and Student’s t-criterion. Each equation is statistically significant reliably reflecting the relationship between the resulting and factor.

The obtained results have proven the 2nd and 4th hypotheses. Conclusion: VAT is directly related to consumer spending, gross profit and gross mixed income, intermediate consumption, and export. VAT refund stimulates export and investments to capital assets. The results of research could be considered as an arguments of proposals to changing the procedure for calculating and paying VAT in Russia.

References:

  1. Vachugov I. V., Sedaev P. V. 2017. “Analysis of the problematic issues of abolishing the reduced VAT rate: theoretical and practical aspects”. Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie, no. 3, pp. 18-28. [In Russian]

  2. Gohberg L.M., Kitova G. A., Rud V. A. 2014. “Tax support for science and innovation: demand and effects”. Forsight, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 18-41. [In Russian]

  3. Ershov M. V. 2018. “Reduction of value added tax: some comments”. Nauchnye trudy Vol’nogo ekonomicheskogo obshchestva Rossii,vol. 209, no. 1, pp. 75-78. [In Russian]

  4. Zhuravleva I. A. 2013. “Problems of tax administration of export VAT in Russia”. Auditorskie vedomosti, no. 3, pp. 64-71. [In Russian]

  5. Kalinin A. 2019. “On the impact of increasing VAT rates on the price level”. Obshchestvo i ekonomika, no. 9, pp. 95-103. [In Russian]

  6. Kazakova M., Knobel A., Sokolov I. 2010. Quality of VAT Administration in OECD and Russia. Reforming the Russian Tax Collection System. Edited by S. G. Sinelnikov-Murylev. Moscow: IET. 128 pp. [In Russian]

  7. Koroleva L. P. 2019 “VAT: an incentive or a barrier to innovation”. In: Serbulova A. V. (ed.). Innovation Management: Challenges and Opportunities for Industries and Economic Sectors, pp. 140-148. Kaliningrad. [In Russian]

  8. Kochetkov N. D. 2019. “The relationship of VAT rates with its share in the state budget and quality of life”. Sovremennaya matematika i koncepcii innovacionnogo matematicheskogo obrazovaniya, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 486-493. [In Russian]

  9. Krutov G. V., Maksimchuk A. G. 2013. “The value added tax in the context of state regulation of foreign economic activity”. Vestnik Krivorozhskogo nacionalnogo universiteta, no. 34 (1), pp. 287-292. [In Russian]

  10. Malkina M. Yu., Balakin R. V. 2016. “Factor analysis of the dynamics of individual tax revenues in Russia in 2006-2014”. Finansy i kreidt, no. 32 (704), pp. 11-24. [In Russian]

  11. Mishustin M. V. 2016. “Factors of tax revenue growth: macroeconomic approach”. Jekonomicheskaja politika, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 8-27. [In Russian]

  12. RF Federal State Statistics Service. National Accounts. http://old.gks.ru/wps/wcm/connect/rosstat_main/rosstat/ru/statistics/accounts/ [In Russian]

  13. Nepran A., Timchenko I. E., Kameneva N. N. 2017. “Fiscal effectiveness of value added tax”. Vestnik jekonomiki, transporta i promyshlennosti, no. 57, pp. 66-76. [In Russian]

  14. RF Federal Taxation Service. Report on the structure of the calculation of value added tax 1-VAT. https://www.nalog.ru/rn13/related_activities/statistics_and_analytics/forms/ [In Russian]

  15. Panskov V. G. 2006. “VAT refund problems and possible solutions”. Nalogovaja politika i praktika, no. 3, pp. 9-11. [In Russian]

  16. Pasechnik A. N., Malnov V. S., Pasechnik L. A., Stoyanovsky A. A. 2008. “On the effectiveness of the application of VAT in the system of state regulation of foreign economic activity”. Vestnik Rossijskoj tamozhennoj akademii, no. 2, pp. 67-74. [In Russian]

  17. Alekseev M. V. et al. 2019. Prospects for Tax Policy. Is There an “Ideal Tax System” for Russia? Moscow: Delo; RANEPA. 126 pp. [In Russian]

  18. Polbin A. 2018. “Increasing VAT from 18 to 20%: macroeconomic effects”. Jekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 55-57. [In Russian]

  19. Sklyar A. V., Tsatsulin A. N. 2011. “Modeling of regional budget revenues from VAT”. Obshhestvo. Sreda. Razvitie, no. 1 (18), pp. 13-18. [In Russian]

  20. Sokolov I. 2017. “Is fiscal devaluation necessary to stimulate economic growth?”. Jekonomicheskoe razvitie Rossii, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 13-18. [In Russian]

  21. Titov V. V., Zhigulsky G. V. 2015. “The effect of the implementation of effective innovations on the tax burden of an industrial enterprise”. Vestnik NGUJeU, no. 1, pp. 272-281. [In Russian]

  22. Chesnokova L. A., Yashina N. I., Kravchenko V. S. 2016. “Formation of factor models of VAT revenues to the federal budget”. Nalogi i nalogooblozhenie, no. 7, pp. 504-509. [In Russian]

  23. Shuvalova E. B., Samuylov I. V. 2010. “ The use of VAT in the field of innovation”. Jekonomika, statistika i informatika. Vestnik UMO, no. 4, pp. 82-86. [In Russian]

  24. Yadrennikova E. V. 2010. “On the problems of illegal VAT refunds from the budget, taking into account the possibility of using the declarative refund procedure”. Nalogi i finansovoe pravo, no. 6, pp. 286-291. [In Russian]

  25. Yakushev N. O. 2019. “On the development of non-resource exports in Russia: features of the application of VAT”. Zhurnal pravovyh i jekonomicheskih issledovanij, no. 4, pp. 268-272. [In Russian]

  26. Asllani G., Satovci B. 2018. “Effect of the change in value added tax on the fiscal stability of Kosovo” [Ucinak promjena poreza na dodanu vrijednost na fiskalnu stabilnost Kosova]. Ekonomski Pregled, no. 69 (4), pp. 423-438.

  27. Catarino J. R., de Moraes e Soares R. 2019. “Restructuring the european VAT tax system: advantages and disadvantages of the adoption of a single-rate model-A study based on the Portuguese case”. European Journal of Government and Economics, no. 8 (2), pp. 145-160.

  28. Tanchev S., Todorov I. 2019. “Tax buoyancy and economic growth: empirical evidence of Bulgaria”. Journal of Tax Reform, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 236-248