The formation of civil identity among students based on formation of professional competencies and public activity: the experience of a multidimensional analysis

Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research


Release:

2019, Vol. 5. №4(20)

Title: 
The formation of civil identity among students based on formation of professional competencies and public activity: the experience of a multidimensional analysis


For citation: Tarasov V. T., Boyko I. I. 2019. “The formation of civil identity among students based on formation of professional competencies and public activity: the experience of a multidimensional analysis”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 5, no 4 (20), pp. 6-29. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2019-5-4-6-29

About the authors:

Vladimir T. Tarasov, Cand. Sci. (Econ.), Associate Professor, Department of Economics and Management, the Russian Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (Cheboksary branch); tarvlad2015@yandex.ru; ORCID: 0000-0002-3539-5618

Ivan I. Boyko, Dr. Sci. (Hist.), Professor, Chief Researcher, Chuvash State Institute of Humanities (Cheboksary); boyko2003@yandex.ru

Abstract:

This article proposes methodological tools for analyzing the relationships between elements of complex social categories. It implements an approach based on the methods of multivariate statistical analysis, including factorial, canonical, and regression types. The proposed methods were experimentally tested on the data of a sociological survey of 688 students of metropolitan universities of Chuvashia in order to identify hidden relationships between the elements of synthetic categories that characterize civic identity, professional competencies, and the social activity of students. Regression dependencies and canonical correlations between the elements of these categories have confirmed the scientific hypothesis of the study that the formation of professional competencies in students during their studies increases their social activity and contributes to their civic identity. At the same time, hidden relationships between the elements of these categories have been identified, many of which turned out to be statistically significant. This hypothesis has not been previously investigated using this toolkit. The proposed methodological tools significantly expand the possibilities of sociological research.

References:

  1. Lapin N. I. (ed.). 2016. Atlas of Modernization of Russia and Its Regions. Moscow: Ves Mir. [In Russian]

  2. Bauman Z. 2008. Flowing Modernity. Saint Petersburg: Piter. [In Russian]

  3. Borzykh D. L. 2016. “On the method of canonical correlations”. Preprint WP2/20I6/01. Moscow: Higher School of Economics. [In Russian]

  4. Borodkin F. M., Ayvazyan S. A. 2006. Social Indices: Students’ Textbook on Statistics and Other Economic Specialties. Moscow: YUNITI-DANA. [In Russian]

  5. Gorshkov M. K., Sheregi F. E. 2010. The Youth of Russia: A Sociological Portrait. Moscow: Tsentr sotsialnogo prognozirovaniya i marketinga. [In Russian]

  6. RF Commission for Information Support of State National Policy of the Presidential Council on Interethnic Relations. “Meeting of the Council on Interethnic Relations in Astrakhan”. https://sovetnational.ru/sovet/materialy-zasedaniy-soveta/zasedanie-soveta-po-mezhnacionalnym-otnosh... [In Russian]

  7. Zdravomyslov A. G. 1999. Interethnic Conflicts in the Post-Soviet Space. Moscow: Aspekt Press. [In Russian]

  8. Zdravomyslov A. G. 1998. “Relativistic theory of the nation and reflective politics”. In: Zdravomyslov A. G. (ed.). A New Approach to the Study of Ethno-Political Dynamics of Russia, pp. 115-122. Moscow: Rossiyskiy nezavisimyy institut sotsialnykh i natsionalnykh problem. [In Russian]

  9. Kryshtanovskiy A. O. 2006. Analysis of Sociological Data Using the SPSS Package: University Textbook. Moscow: Higher School of Economics. [In Russian]

  10. Magranov A. S., Detochenko L. S. 2018. “Civic identity of modern student youth: features and transformation factors”. Social Studies, no 8, pp. 108-116. [In Russian]

  11. Mosiyenko O. S., Filonenko V. I., Magranov A. S., Ponedelkov A. V. 2017. “Features and contradictions of the professional socialization of modern student youth: the results of interregional sociological research”. Vlast’, no 5, pp. 18-28. [In Russian]

  12. RF President Decree of 19 December 2012 No 1666 “On the Strategy of the state national policy of the Russian Federation for the period until 2025”. https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/70184810/ [In Russian]

  13. Osipov G. V., Andreyev E. P. 1977. Methods of Measurement in Sociology. Moscow: Nauka. [In Russian]

  14. Przhilenskaya I. B., Shapovalov V. A., Shulga M. M. 2012. “Features of the formation of civic identity of students in a multicultural region”. Vestnik Stavropolskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no 79, pp. 5-9. [In Russian]

  15. Osipov G. V. (ed.). 2009. Sociologist’s Workbook. 5th edition. Moscow: LIBROKOM. [In Russian]

  16. Tishkov V. A., Barash R. E., Stepanov V. V. (eds.). 2014. Russian Students: Identity, Life Strategies and Civic Potential. Moscow: IEA RAN. [In Russian]

  17. Tishkov V. A. 1989. “Forgetting the nation (post-nationalist understanding of nationalism)”. Voprosy filosofii, no 9, pp. 3-26. [In Russian]

  18. Turen A. 1998. The Return of the Person Acting. Essay on Sociology. Moscow: Nauchnyy mir. [In Russian]

  19. Tishkov V. A., Stepanov V. V. 2018. Ethnic and Religious Diversity in Russia. 2nd edition, revised. Moscow: Institut etnologii i antropologii RAN. [In Russian]

  20. Sherry A., Henson R. 2005. “Conducting and interpreting canonical correlation analysis in personality research: a user-friendly primer”. Journal of Personality Assessment, vol. 84, no 1, pp. 37-48. DOI: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8401_09

  21. Holzinger Karl. 1944. “A simple method of factor analyses”. Psychometrica, vol. 9, pp. 257-262.

  22. Hotelling H. 1936. “Relations between two sets of variates”. Biometrika, vol. 28, no 3-4, pp. 321-377.