Interpretations of anti-global social movements from the perspective of ethics economy reflection

Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research


Release:

2019, Vol. 5. №3(19)

Title: 
Interpretations of anti-global social movements from the perspective of ethics economy reflection


For citation: Pogonowska B. 2019. “Interpretations of anti-global social movements from the perspective of ethics economy reflection”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 5, no 3 (19), pp. 8-22. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2019-5-3-8-22

About the author:

Pogonowska Barbara, Ph. D., Associate Professor, Department of Sociology and Business Ethics, Poznan University of Economics and Business (Poland)
barbara.pogonowska@ue.poznan.pl

Abstract:

The main interests of the article are the social movements and oppositions, which have emerged during and after the financial crisis of 2008. The social events like Wall Street Occupy, Fight for $15, or Make Poverty History can be perceived as a very interesting form of resistance to the capitalistic system of economy. The major objective is to recognize the plurality of interpretations of the cultural context and the role of these grassroots movements. That plurality is a consequence of axiological assumptions related to the concept of society. The other goal of such considerations is to expose that grassroots movements may cause some social changes within the sphere of economy according to current social expectations. The article attempts at presenting a culture-oriented approach that implies the constructivist vision of society. The methodology of constructivism includes the method of qualitative research such as humanistic interpretation of social beliefs developed by Jerzy Kmita.

References:

  1. Bendyk E., Mazuś M. 2015. “Archipelag Kukiza”. Polityka, no 21 (3010), 20 May. [In Polish]

  2. Górna K., Sienkiewicz K., Iwański M., Szreder K., Ruksza S., Figiel J. (eds.). 2011. Czarna księga polskich artystów. oprac. zb. [The Black Book of Polish Artists]. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Krytyka Polityczna. [In Polish]

  3. Żakowski J. 2015. “Czas horroru”. The interview of J. Żakowski with prof. Czapliński. Polityka, no 31, 29 July — 4 August. [In Polish]

  4. Stasiński M. 2015. “Czasem trzeba przegrać wybory, żeby wygrać jutro”. The interview of M. Stasiński with Javier Cercas. Gazeta Wyborcza, 6-7 June. [In Polish]

  5. Domosławski A. 2014. “Chilijscy oburzeni: nie będzie barykad, tylko systematyczna praca”. Accessed 11 October 2019. http://www.krytykapolityczna.pl/artykuly/ameryka-lacinska/20140423/chilijscy-oburzeni-nie-bedzie-bar... [In Polish]

  6. Drozda J. 2014. “Paradygmat emancypacyjny? O możliwym nowym zwrocie w polskim kulturoznawstwie inspirowanym tradycją CCCS”. Kultura Popularna, no 1/39. Accessed 5 June 2019. http://www.academia.edu/8614010/PARADYGMAT_EMANCYPACYJNY_O_mo%C5%BCliwym_nowym_zwrocie_politycznym_w... [In Polish]

  7. Durrmeyer S., Biernat J. 2012. “Stephane Hessel. Ojciec oburzonych”. Newsweek. Accessed 11 October 2019. http://swiat.newsweek.pl/stephane-hessel--ojciec-oburzonych,85993,1,1.html [In Polish]

  8. Foucault M. 2002. Filozofia. Historia. Polityka. Wybór pism. Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN. [In Polish]

  9. Foucault M. 2002. The Order of Discourse. Accessed 9 December 2019. https://www.kit.ntnu.no/sites/www.kit.ntnu.no/files/Foucault_The%20Order%20of%20Discourse.pdf

  10. Giddens A. 2009. Sociology. Accessed 8 May 2019. https://ia600206.us.archive.org/15/items/Sociology_6_edition/Sociology_6_edition.pdf

  11. Hessel S. 2011. Indignez-vous! Get angry! Cry out! Accessed 9 December 2019. http://indignez-vous-indignacion.blogspot.com/p/english.html

  12. Misztal B. A. 1998. Trust in Modern Societies. The Search for the Bases of Social Order. Accessed 10 December 2019. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/0602/5cfa3cb67675dd1cb65fa48753ede5211163.pdf?_ga=2.203289489.16748...

  13. Różycka Z. 2014. “O Madagaskarze napisze ktoś inny”. The interview of Misza Tomaszewski with Artur Domosławski. Kontakt. Accessed 11 October 2019. Kontakt. Accessed 11 October 2019. http://magazynkontakt.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/Kontakt-26_Zielone-pojecie.pdf [In Polish]

  14. Oxford Learner’s Dictionary. “Emancipate”. Accessed 10 July 2019. www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/emancipate

  15. Pałubicka A. 2013. Gramatyka kultury europejskiej. Bydgoszcz: Oficyna Wydawnicza Epigram. [In Polish]

  16. Zieliński M. A. 2015. “Polska budzi się 40 lat za późno”. The interview of Michał A. Zieliński with Jan Sowa. Gazeta Wyborcza, Saturday-Sunday 2-3 May. [In Polish]

  17. Danielewski M., Wybieralski M. 2012. “Poznań to nie Facebook” Z. Bauman in the interview with M. Danielewski and M. Wybieralski. Gazeta Wyborcza, 7 December. [In Polish]

  18. Żakowski J. 2012. “Power to the Cities”.The interview with Richard Florida. Niezbędnik Inteligenta Polityka, no 1, special edition, pp. 116-120. [In Polish]

  19. Rębała M., Wyrzykowska K. 2016. “Oburzeni młodzi Francuzi zarywają noce”. Gazeta Wyborcza, 26 April. [In Polish]

  20. Standing G. 2011. The Precariat. The New Dangerous Class. Accessed 9 December 2019. https://www.hse.ru/data/2013/01/28/1304836059/Standing.%20The_Precariat__The_New_Dangerous_Class__-B...

  21. Sztompka P. 2002. “Socjologia”. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Znak. [In Polish]

  22. Gazeta Prawna. 2015. “Turcja: Zamknięty dostęp do placu Taksim w Stambule. Dzisiaj rocznica protestów”. Gazeta Prawna, 31 May. Accessed 11 October 2019. http://www.gazetaprawna.pl/artykuly/874680,turcja-zamkniety-dostep-do-placu-taksim-w-stambule-dzisia... [In Polish]

  23. UN Global Compact. “The Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact”. Accessed 8 June 2019. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles

  24. Uslaner E. 2003. “The Moral Foundations of Trust”. Paper presented at the Symposium “Trust in the Knowledge Society” (20 September, Jyvaskala, Finland). University of Jyvaskyla. Accessed 9 December 2019. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228191342_The_Moral_Foundatio_of_Trust

  25. Waligóra A. 2019. “Social entrepreneurship vs free market. Typology (of lack) cooperation between social economy entities and enterprises”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 5, no 1, pp. 23-35. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2019-5-1-23-35

  26. Winnicka E. 2012. “Cztery pory oburzenia”. Niezbędnik Inteligenta. Polityka, no 1, special edition. [In Polish]

  27. Žižek S. 2012. “Occupy Wall Street: what is to be done next?”. Guardian, 24 April. Accessed 9 December 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/apr/24/occupy-wall-street-what-is-to-be-do...