The Role of the Social Capital in the Formation of Managerial Activity in the Work Behavior of Employees (Based on the Results of the Sociological Study in the Organizations of the Industrial Sector of the Perm Territory)

Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research


Release:

2018, Vol. 4. №3

Title: 
The Role of the Social Capital in the Formation of Managerial Activity in the Work Behavior of Employees (Based on the Results of the Sociological Study in the Organizations of the Industrial Sector of the Perm Territory)


For citation: Plotnikova E. B., Germanov I. A. 2018. “The Role of the Social Capital in the Formation of Managerial Activity in the Work Behavior of Employees (Based on the Results of the Sociological Study in the Organizations of the Industrial Sector of the Perm Territory)”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 4, no 3, pp. 43-58. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2018-4-3-43-58

About the authors:

Elena B. Plotnikova, Cand. Sci. (Hist.), Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Sociology, Perm State University; plotnikova1958@yandex.ru

Igor A. Germanov, Cand. Sci. (Soc.), Associate Professor, Department of Sociology, Perm State University; Germanov1973@yandex.ru

Abstract:

The concept of the social capital in modern scientific discussions is presented in most cases by theoretical approaches to the definition, the mechanisms of its formation, and the choice of methods for operationalizing the “social capital” notion. As a rule, the subject matter of the social capital is focused in surveys of religious, ethnic communities, territories, households, and families. The application of the concept of the “social capital” to industrial production is not so common in Russian studies, while modern literature pays attention to the measurement and evaluation of the social capital in the industrial sector, as well as to its impact on the economic success of the enterprise. The novelty of this article is to consider the social capital in the context of the formation of managerial activity of workers. This study, conducted in a qualitative tradition at enterprises in the industrial sector of the Perm Territory, complements the data from the formalized survey on the forms of social capital and the characteristics of networks.

This study provides information on the content side of the social capital: on what issues do employees interact in different types of networks? What resources are subject to exchange and accumulation? In-depth interviewing revealed such significant resource components of the social capital in industrial enterprises as the state and levels of managerial activity of workers.

As a result of this research, the classification of the network communication of the organizations’ personnel has been developed, which allows revealing the interaction of participants in the labor process when exchanging different types of resources. Formation of the managerial activity of participants in the labor process occurs through interaction at two levels: normative and subjective/agency level. At both levels, the accumulation of resources takes place, which is expressed in the possession of rights that allow workers to be involved in production management. The difference between the normative and the subjective/agency levels is the demonstration of so-called “passive activity” in the first case and the detection (demonstration) of the need and motivational activity of employees based on identifying themselves with the organization through the perception of the goals, norms and values of the organization, in the second place. To increase the subjectivity of employees, participative practices are being introduced at the enterprises under the study. Such practices directly affect not only the economic indicators of the enterprise but also form an employee of a ‘new type’. The social capital of organizations of the industrial sector is becoming an important component of the industrial policy of enterprises.

References:

  1. Bourdieu P. 2002. “Formy kapitala” [The Forms of Capital]. Ekonomicheskaja sociologija, vol. 3, no 5, pp. 60-75. 
  2. Konstitutsiya. [Constitution of the RF]. 2018. Accessed 10 June 2018. URL: http://www.constitution.ru 
  3. Coulman J. 2001. “Kapital social’nyj i chelovecheskij” [Social and Human Capitals]. Obshhestvennye nauki i sovremennost’, no 3, pp. 121-139. 
  4. Loginov V. I. 2010. “Sotsial’nyy kapital organizatsii: diagnostika i upravleniye”. [Social Capital of the Organization: Diagnostics and Management]. Cand. Sci. (Soc.). diss. abstract, p. 23. Tver.
  5. Plotnikova E. B., Germanov I. A., Kuznetsov A. E. 2007. Rabotniki kak sub”yekty trudovykh otnosheniy: izmeneniye strategiy uchastiya v upravlenii proizvodstvom na sovremennykh rossiyskikh predpriyatiyakh: monografiya [Workers as Subjects of Labor Relations: Changing of Strategies for Participation in Production Management at Modern Russian Enterprises]. Perm: Perm University.
  6. Rezanova E. V. 2008. “Struktura sotsial’nogo kapitala v sfere trudovykh otnosheniy organizatsii” [The Structure of Social Capital in the Sphere of Labor Relations of the Organization]. Viestnik Briesckaha univiersiteta. Sieryja humanitarnych i hramadskich navuk, no 4 (35), pp. 50-56.
  7. Rezanova E. V. 2009. “Sotsial’nyy kapital organizatsii: teoretiko-metodologicheskiye aspekty issledovaniya” [Social Capital of the Organization: Theoretical and Methodological Aspects of the Research]. Nauchnyye vedomosti Belgorodskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo, vol. 7, no 2 (57), pp. 120-125.
  8. Tihonova N. E. 2004 “Sotsial’nyy kapital kak faktor neravenstva” [Social Capital as a Factor of Inequality]. Obshchestvennyye nauki i sovremennost’, no 4. pp. 24-35.
  9. RF Labor Code (as of 16 February 2018). Accessed 10 July 2018. http://logos-pravo.ru/trudovoy-kodeks-rf-tk-rf
  10. Shaposhnikova V. V. 2009. “Sotsial’nyy kapital v trudovykh kollektivakh promyshlennykh predpriyatiy” [Social Capital in Labor Collectives of Industrial Enterprises]. Cand. Sci. (Econ.) diss. abstract. Moscow. 
  11. Adler P. S., Kwon S. 2002. “Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept”. Academy of Management Review, vol. 27, pp. 17-40. DOI: 10.5465/AMR.2002.5922314
  12. Berzina K. 2011. “Enterprise Related Social Capital: Different Levels of Social Capital Accumulation”. Economics & Sociology, vol. 4, no 2. pp. 66-83. 
  13. Bourdieu P. 2004. The Forms of Capital. The RoutledgeFalmer Reader in Sociology of Education. Edited by S. J. Ball. Pp. 15-29. London & New York: RoutledgeFalmer. 
  14. Coleman J. S. 1988. “Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital”. The American Journal of Sociology, vol. 94. Supplement: Organizations and Institutions: Sociological and Economic Approaches to the Analysis of Social Structure, pp. 95-120. Accessed 14 July 2018. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2780243 
  15. Leana C. R., Van Buren H. J. 1999. “Organizational Social Capital and Employment Practices”. Academy of Management Review, vol. 24, no 3, pp. 538-555. DOI: 10.5465/amr.1999.2202136
  16. Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. 1998. “Social Capital, Intellectual Capital, and the Organizational Advantage”. The Academy of Management Review, vol. 23, no 2, pp. 242-266. DOI: 10.2307/259373
  17. Portes A. 1998. “Social Capital: Its Origins and Application in Modern Sociology”. Annual Review of Sociology, vol. 24, pp. 1-24. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.1
  18. Tantardini M., Kroll A. 2015. “The Role of Organizational Social Capital in Performance Management”. Public Performance & Management Review, vol. 39, pp. 83-99.