Representations of Social Entrepreneurship: From Business in the Social Sphere to Public Participation

Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research


Release:

2018, Vol. 4. №3

Title: 
Representations of Social Entrepreneurship: From Business in the Social Sphere to Public Participation


For citation: Negrul S. V. 2018. “Representations of Social Entrepreneurship: From Business in the Social Sphere to Public Participation”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 4, no 3, pp. 22-42. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2018-4-3-22-42

About the author:

Svetlana V. Negrul, Cand. Sci. (Soc.), Associate Professor, Sociology Department, National Research Tomsk State University; svetlight@bk.ru

Abstract:

The relevance of this study is determined by the importance of the role of a social entrepreneur in determining ways for social problems solving based on the network interconnections of civil society. A social entrepreneur is able to become a new subject of social transformations, which is emphasized in the framework of the activist approach. New practices actualize the problem of integrating the socio-entrepreneurial group into social structure and its recognition as a socially significant community. Structuring the image of social entrepreneurship was based on the identification of the following semantic units of analysis: (1) the meanings of the “social” and “entrepreneurial” in activities of the subject; (2) the nature of the identifications; (3) features of the values produced by social entrepreneurs.

Based on the analysis of the texts, the following images were identified: social entrepreneurship as a social business, social service and social innovation. The latter image is most focused on social transformations, but it is presented fragmentary and has insufficient ability to generate the trust of other communicators due to the presence of negative identities in the discourse, the context of non-seriousness and the metaphors of exclusion.

References:

  1. Anisimova M. 2011. “O probleme osobennikh detey” [About the Problem of Special Children]. Tomskie novosti +. 25 November. Accessed 22 November 2017. http://tomsk-novosti.ru/marina-anisimova-o-probleme-osobenny-h-detej/
  2. Afanasieva A., Zhidkaya A. 2012. “Iohanna Hallin, fond Reach for Change: Socialniy predprinimatel ne dolzhen boiatsja slova ‘net’” [Johanna Hallin, Reach for Change: A Social Entrepreneur Should Not Be Afraid of the Word “No”]. Tomskiy obzor. 21 November. Accessed 22 November 2017. https://obzor.westsib.ru/article/378843/
  3. Sait “Malyy i sredniy biznes g. Tomska”. 2014. “Bisnesu otkrojut dostup k socialnoj sfere” [Business Will Be Given Access to the Social Sphere]. Accessed 22 November 2017. http://mb.admin.tomsk.ru/node/8303/
  4. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Zakonodatel’noy Dumy Tomskoy oblasti. 2016. “Vystupleniye O. V. Kozlovskoy na 8-м sobranii Zakonodatel’noy Dumy Tomskoy oblasti” [The Speech of  O. V. Kozlovskaya at the 8th Meeting of the Legislative Duma of Tomsk Region]. Accessed 22 November 2017. http://old.duma.tomsk.ru/page/21891/
  5. Ofitsial’nyy sayt fonda “Nache budushcheye”. “Godovoy otchet 2015 g. Lidery mneniy” [Annual Report 2015. Opinion Leaders]. Accessed 22 November 2017. http://www.nb-fund.ru/otchet/20141/
  6. Loseva K. 2011. “Mozhet li biznes zarabatyvat dobrymi delami? (Kruglyy stol)” [Can Business Earn From Good Deeds? (Round Table)]. Tomskie novosti +. 7 October. Accessed 22 November 2017. http://tomsk-novosti.ru/143239/
  7. Matskovskaja А., Shchedrina P. 2015. “Bolshie vozmozhnosti. Kak oblastnoy konkurs molodezhnykh sotsproyektov pomogaet proyavit sebia i izmenit mir” [Great Opportunities. How the Regional Contest of Juniors’ Social Projects Helps Them to Manifest Themselves and Change the World]. Tomskiy obzor. 14 December. Accessed 22 November 2017. http://obzor.westsib.ru/article/469705/
  8. Negrul S. V., Kashpur V. V., Baryshev A. A. 2018. “Problema konstruirovaniya sotsial’nogo predprinimatel’stva kak performativnogo fenomena: konkurentsiya smyslov i tsennostey v diskurse klyuchevykh steykkholderov” [The Problem of Constructing Social Entrepreneurship as a Performative Phenomemon: the Competition of Meanings and Values in the Discourse of Key Stakeholders]. Vestnik tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no 429, pp. 5-13. DOI: 10.17223/15617793/429/11
  9. Serebryakova Ye. 2012. “Kak Roman Kazakov: Kak nauchit’ sibiryakov yest’ sushi, personal — zarabatyvat’ den’gi, a biznesmenov — zanimat’sya blagotvoritel’nost’yu” [Like Roman Kazakov: How to Teach Siberians to Eat Sushi, Staff to Make Money, and Businessmen to Do Charity]. Tomskiy obzor. 12 July.  Accessed 22 November 2017. https://obzor.westsib.ru/article/371526
  10. Taylasheva Ye. 2015. “Roman Kazakov. Boysya komforta!” [Roman Kazakov. Fear Comfort!]. Tomskie novosti +. 15 June. Accessed 14 January 2018. http://tomsk-novosti.ru/roman-kazakov-bojsya-komforta/
  11. Gorodskoy portal tomsk.ru. 2015. “Tomskiy kollayder soberet sotsial’nykh predprinimateley” [Tomsk Collider Will Bring Together Social Entrepreneurs]. 27 May. Accessed 22 November 2017. http://www.tomsk.ru/news/view/102753
  12. Fatkulina Е. 2016. “Fond “Navstrechu peremenam”: mozhet li sotsial’noye predprinimatel’stvo prinosit’ den’gi? Interv’yu s Tat’yanoy Burmistrovoy, predsedatelem upravlyayushchego soveta fonda ‘Navstrechu peremenam’” [Foundation “Towards Change”: Can Social Entrepreneurship Bring Money? Interview with Tatyana Burmistrova, Chairman of the Governing Board of the “Towards Change” Foundation]. Tomskiy obzor. 4 March. Accessed 22 November 2017. https://obzor.westsib.ru/article/478312/
  13. Fillips L., Yorgensen M. V. 2004. Diskurs-analiz. Teoriya i metod [Discourse Analysis. Theory and Method]. Kharkiv: Izdatelstvo Gumanitarnyy tsentr.
  14. Malyy i sredniy biznes g. Tomska. 2014. “Shkola sotsial‘nogo predprinimatel‘stva” [School of Social Entrepreneurship]. 10 February. Accessed 22 November 2017. http://mb.tomsk.ru/events/126810/shkola-socialnogo-predprinimatelstva/
  15. Baumol W. J. 1990. “Entrepreneurship: Productive, Unproductive, and Destructive”. Journal of Political Economy, October, vol. 98, no 5, part 1, pp. 893-921.
  16. Boschee J., McClurg J. 2003. Toward a Better Understanding of Social Entrepreneurship: Some Important Distinctions. Bowen H. 1953. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper Rowe. 
  17. Bowen H. 1953. Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. New York: Harper Rowe.
  18.  Burr V. 1995. An Introduction to Social Constructionism. London: Routledge.
  19. Dees J. G. 2001. The Meaning of Social Entrepreneurship. Center for the Advancement of Social Entrepreneurship, Duke University’s Fuqua School of Business. 
  20. Fairclough N. 1995. Critical Discourse Analysis. Boston: Addison Wesley Publishing Company.
  21. Laclau E., Mouffe C. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy. Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. 2nd edition. London.
  22. Leadbeater Ch. 1997.  The Rise of the Social Entrepreneur. London: Demos. 
  23. Martin R. L., Osberg, S. 2007. “Social Entrepreneurship: The Case for Definition”. Stanford Social Innovation Review. Spring.
  24. Porter M., Kramer M. 2011. “The Big Idea: Creating Shared Value; How to Reinvent Capitalism and Unleash a Wave of Innovation and Growth”. Harvard Business Review, vol. 89, no ½, pp. 62-77.
  25. Szeman I. 2015. “Entrepreneurship as the New Common Sense”. The South Atlantic Quarterly, vol. 114, no 3, pp. 471-490.
  26. Wood L., Kroger R. 2000. Doing Discourse Analysis. London, Thousand Oaks CA: SAGE Publications.