Priority of the Population’s Quality of Life Components in the Contemporary Russian Conditions

Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research


Release:

2018, Vol. 4. №1

Title: 
Priority of the Population’s Quality of Life Components in the Contemporary Russian Conditions


For citation: Pasovets Yu. M. 2018. “Priority of the Population’s Quality of Life Components in the Contemporary Russian Conditions”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 4, no 1, pp. 85-94. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2018-4-1-85-94

About the author:

Yuliya M. Pasovets, Cand. Sci. (Soc.), Associate Professor, Department of the Sociology and Political Science, Kursk State University; yulia_pasovets@mail.ru

Abstract:

This paper presents a new foreshortening of a perspective of population quality of life that is connected with a problem of determining the content of quality of life as a social phenomenon, its structural components, and their interpretation as priority for society or social community at a certain stage of development.

The author defines the components of quality of life, priority for contemporary Russian conditions, reflecting the social problems significant both for Russians in general and for inhabitants of concrete regions on the analysis basis of methodological approaches and empirical data. The empirical base of research involves the results of sociological surveys: the focus group interview conducted by the author with participation of young people from the Kursk Region, and the All-Russian polls realized by the Russian Public Opinion Research Center (VCIOM).

The authors have revealed that the majority of Russians consider the most significant components of quality of life to be the following: health, safety, quality and availability of food, ecology as quality of water and air, stable earnings, quality education, and comfortable living conditions.

In the conditions of the Kursk Region as one of Russian regions, the most prioritized components of quality of life, according to youth, are income and consumption. This opinion reflects the regional importance of the low-income level and material security of the main part of the population. At the same time, the quality of food and goods, living conditions, availability and quality of medical services, education are also the key components of quality of life in the region.

References:

  1. Lapin N. I. (ed.). 2016. Atlas modernizatsii Rossii i ee regionov: sotsioekonomicheskie i sotsiokul'turnye tendentsii i problemy: kollektivnyy nauchnyy trud [Atlas of Modernization of Russia and Its Regions: Socio-Economic and Socio-Cultural Trends and Problems]. Moscow: Ves' Mir.
  2. Belyaeva L. A. 2009. “Uroven' i kachestvo zhizni. Problemy izmereniya i interpretatsii” [Level and Quality of Life. The Problems of Measurement and Interpretation]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya, no 1, pp. 33-42.
  3. Zubarevich N. V. 2005. Sotsial'noe razvitie regionov Rossii: problemy i tendentsii perekhodnogo perioda [Social development of Russia's regions: problems and trends in the transition period]. 2nd edition. Moscow: Editorial URSS.
  4. VTSIOM. 2016. “Kachestvo zhizni rossiyan: v krizisnom zerkale” [Quality of Life of Russians: In a Crisis Mirror]. VTSIOM Press-report no 3218. http://www.wciom.ru
  5. Kogay E. A., Pasovets Yu. M., Kogay A. A., Yatskova D. S. 2015. Kurskaya oblast' na sotsiokul'turnoy karte Rossii [Kursk Region on a Socio-Cultural Map of Russia]. Kursk: Kurskaya gorodskaya tipografiya; Kursk. gos. un-t.
  6. Pasovets Yu. M. 2011. “Kachestvo zhizni naseleniya kak integrirovannyy pokazatel' effektivnosti funktsionirovaniya regiona” [The Quality of Population’s Life as an Integrated Index of Function Region’s Efficiency]. Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo: Seriya Sotsial'nye nauki, no 1 (21), pp. 66-73.
  7. Pasovets Yu. M. 2017. “K voprosu o regional'nom izmerenii sovremennogo rossiyskogo obshchestva” [To a Question of Regional Measurement of Contemporary Russian Society]. Vestnik Voronezhskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Istoriya. Politologiya. Sotsiologiya, no 1, pp. 90‒94.
  8. Lapin N. I., Belyaeva L. A. (ed.). 2013. Problemy sotsiokul'turnoy modernizatsii regionov Rossii [Problems of Social and Cultural Modernization of Russian Regions]. Moscow: Academia; IF RAN.
  9. In-t sotsial.-ekonom. problem narodonaseleniya RAN. 2012. Regional'nye osobennosti urovnya i kachestva zhizni [Regional Features of the Level and Quality of Life]. Moscow: M-Studio.
  10. Lapin N. I., Belyaeva L. A. (ed.). 2009. Regiony v Rossii: sotsiokul'turnye portrety regionov v obshcherossiyskom kontekste [Regions in Russia: Socio-Cultural Portraits of the Regions in the All-Russian Context]. Moscow: Academia; IF RAN.
  11. Andrushchak G. V., Burdyak A. Ya., Gimpelson V. E. et al. 2011. “Uroven' i obraz zhizni naseleniya Rossii v 1989-2009 godakh” [Level and Lifestyle of the Population of Russia in 1989-2009]. Report to the 12th International conference on the problems of economics and society’s development (Moscow, 5-7 April 2011). Edited by E. G. Yasin. Moscow: Izd. dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki.