The Neoclassical Approach to Development of Solutions to Improve Our National Economy

Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research


2017, Vol. 3. №2

The Neoclassical Approach to Development of Solutions to Improve Our National Economy

For citation: Chuveleva E. A. 2017. “The Neoclassical Approach to Development of Solutions to Improve Our National Economy”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 3, no 2, pp. 167-182. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2017-3-2-167-182

About the author:

Elena A. Chuveleva, Сand. Sci. (Tech.), Associate Professor, Department of Management and Marketing, Novokuznetsk Branch-Institute of Kemerovo State University;


This article suggests the hypothesis of considering the healthy egoism of economic agents, who are limited by the negative impact on their predominant economic activity of uncertainty (risk-taking), the driving force behind the development of the economy, which requires the mechanism compensating acceptable levels of profitability underpaid to agents. A vector of development of such a compensation mechanism is set, defined by the model (ideal) state of the financial-economic equilibrium in the economy.

It is shown that the reproduction processes of mergers and acquisitions of non-financial corporations are able to distance the economy from named ideal (model) state. The reason for this is the effect of unwieldy and unmanageable (by the forces of corporate risk management) risks, including renewable, on the enterprises’ integration projects. In the context of the basic methodological principles of the neoclassical theory of economic equilibrium, the author shows the theoretical soundness and elegance of the idea of creating a mechanism of financial compensation, underserved to investors, in merger projects and acquisitions to an acceptable level of profitability.

The author shows that the establishment of a mechanism for financial compensation, underserved to selfish buyers in mergers and profitability acquisitions or losses from the negative impact of risks, can be an important element in the complex task of the national economy recovery. The operation of such a mechanism can prevent the displacement of the motivations of buyers of target companies within the scope of their consumer and speculative usage, harming the economy and society. Principles of identification of financial instrument for creation of such mechanism allow to recognize the insurance risks of mergers and acquisitions of non-financial corporations to be the only acceptable among the existing ones.


  1. Zhuravleva G. P. 2012. “Volatil’nost’ jekonomicheskoj teorii v uslovijakh novoj jekonomicheskoj real’nosti” [The Volatility of Economic Theory in the New Economic Reality]. Nauchno-analiticheskij zhurnal “Nauka i praktika” RJeU im. G .V. Plehanova, no 1 (7), pp. 40-50.
  2. Likhachev M. O. 2008. “Makroekonomicheskoe ravnovesie i modeli jekonomicheskogo povedenija” [Macroeconomic Balance and Models of Economic Behavior]. Ekonomicheskie nauki, no 4 (41), pp. 104-107.
  3. Nazarian V. A. 2012. “Finansovaja rezul’tativnost’ slijanij i pogloshchenij” [Financial Performance of Mergers and Acquisitions]. Cand. Sci. (Econ.) diss. abstract. Moscow. (accessed on 1 March 2015) 
  4. Patinkin D. 2004. “Den’gi, protsent i tseny. Soedinenie teorii deneg i teorii stoimosti” [Money, Interest and Prices. Connecting the Theory of Money and Value Theory]. Translated from English; edited by N. Ya. Patyrakova. Moscow: Economika.
  5. Pirogov A.N. “Otsenka slijanij i pogloshchenij rossijskikh kompanij” [Valuation for Mergers and Acquisitions of Russian Companies]. (accessed on 1 March 2015) 
  6. Sukharev O. S. 2015. “Metodologicheskie perspektivy jekonomicheskoj nauki: ‘mejnstrim’ i ‘evoljucionizm’” [Methodological Perspectives of Economic Science: “Mainstream” and “Evolutionism”]. Vestnik JuRGTU (NPI), no 3, pp. 24-39.
  7. Khubiev K. A. 2012. “Ekonomicheskaja teorija: mezhdu proshlym i budushchim” [Economic Theory: Between the Past and the Future]. TERRA ECONOMICUS, vol. 10, no 3, pp. 58-62.
  8. Chuveleva E. A., Zatepyakin O. A. 2015. “Riskogennyj harakter prirody korporativnykh slijanij i pogloshchenij” [The Take-Risking Nature of Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions]. Vestnik Tomskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ekonomika, no 4 (32), pp. 17-40.
  9. Chuveleva E. A. 2016. “Printsipy nivelirovanija negativnykh posledstvij vlijanija riskov na jeffektivnost’ proektov korporativnykh slijanij i pogloshchenij” [Principles of Leveling the Negative Consequences of Risks Influence on the Efficiency of Projects Corporate Mergers and Acquisitions]. Izvestija Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaja serija. Serija Jekonomika. Upravlenie. Pravo, no 3, pp. 332-337.
  10. Chuveleva E. A. 2016. “Stimulirovanie strategicheskoj korporativnoj integratsii kak faktor konvergentsii real’nogo i finansovogo sektorov jekonomiki” [Promotion of the Strategic Corporate Integration as a Factor of Convergence of the Real and Financial Sectors of the Economy]. Problemy ucheta i finansov, no 2, pp. 42-49.
  11. Schulz D. N., Schulz M. N. 2010. “Modelirovanie obshchego ravnovesija jekonomiki Rossii” [Modeling General Equilibrium of the Russian Economy]. In: Informacionnye sistemy i matematicheskie metody v jekonomike: sb. nauch. trudov, pp. 122-123. Perm’: Permskij gosudarstvennyj universitet.
  12. Yudina I. N. 2013. “Neoklassicheskaja makrojekonomika, ili novyj vzgljad na problemu jekonomicheskogo ravnovesija i rol’ jekonomicheskoj politiki” [Neoclassical Macroeconomics, or a New View on the Problem of Economic Equilibrium and the Role of Economic Policy]. Zhurnal ekonomicheskoj teorii, no 1, pp. 114-119.