Discourse on the Socio-Economic Aspects of the Global Competition Space (Based on International Publications)

Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research


Release:

2017, Vol. 3. №2

Title: 
Discourse on the Socio-Economic Aspects of the Global Competition Space (Based on International Publications)


For citation: Melnik V. V. 2017. “Discourse on the Socio-Economic Aspects of the Global Competition Space (Based on International Publications)”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research, vol. 3, no 2, pp. 8-24. DOI: 10.21684/2411-7897-2017-3-2-8-24

About the author:

Vladimir V. Melnik, Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Professor, Department of General and Economic Sociology, University of Tyumen; eLibrary AuthorID, ScopusID, v_v_melnik@mail.ru

Abstract:

Competitiveness, as a social phenomenon, has started to appropriate the institutional level at the beginning of the industrial revolutions in Europe, North America, Japan, China, India, South-Eastern Asian countries and Maghreb. This process was determined by the consolidation of the industrial policies of developed countries, growth of trade union movements and the social responsibility of business, leading to an understanding of the organizations’ main asset — their human resources, the creation of new concepts of management, the formation of competition theories, and organizations and corporations coming to global markets and integrating competitive advantages in this battle of national cultures. The World Economic Forum Research reports show, these aspects take their part in lining up the annual countries ratings. However, the processes of globalization have necessitated studying the competitiveness of territorial locus of smaller countries of Europe and the Arab States, taking into account their cultural mentality, the level of education of their population and technological development. The researchers note some negative factors of competition, which are sometimes used as a factor of political struggle at the national level. Research of competitive advantage of organizations focuses on human resources flows and employees’ competences, developed by systems of continuous education and training. This is the most important factor of innovation activity of staff organizations, firms, and, hence, their main competitive advantage. Moreover, European Governments take on the role of the organizer of the tripartite negotiation processes to strengthen the social significance of competitiveness for the EU population.

References:

  1. Weber M. 2002. “Osnovnye sotsiologicheskie ponyatiya: antologiya” [Basic Sociological Concepts. Anthology], vol. 1. Moscow.
  2. Porter M. E. 2011. Konkurentnaya strategiya: metodika analiza otrasley i konkurentov [Competitive Strategy: The Analysis of Industries and Competitors]. Translated from German. 4th edition. Moscow: Al’pina Pablisher.
  3. Porter M. E. 2000. Konkurentsiya [Competition]. Translated from English. Moscow: Vil’yams.
  4. Programma razvitiya OON: indeks chelovecheskogo razvitiya v stranakh mira v 2014 godu [United Nations Development Programme: Human Development Index in the World in 2014.]. http://gtmarket.ru/news/2014/07/24/6843
  5. Radaev V. V. “Konkurentsiya kak sotsial’no ukorenennyy protsess” [Competition as a Socially Rooted Process]. http://www.seinstitute.ru/Files/Z6-p59-80.pdf
  6. Reyting stran mira po urovnyu valovogo natsional’nogo dokhoda na dushu naseleniya [Rating of the Countries of the World by the Level of Gross National Income per capita]. http://gtmarket.ru/ratings/rating-countries-gni/rating-countries-gni-info
  7. Reyting stran mira po urovnyu obrazovaniya [Rating of Countries in the World in Terms of Level of Education]. http://gtmarket.ru/ratings/education-index/education-index-info
  8. Reyting stran mira po urovnyu prodolzhitel’nosti zhizni [Rating of the Countries of the World by the Level of Life Expectancy]. http://gtmarket.ru/ratings/life-expectancy-index/life-expectancy-index-info
  9. Chornodid I. C. 2013. “Metodologiya analizu sotsial’noi konkurentno-spromozhnosti kraini” [Methodology for the Analysis of the Country’s Socially Competitive Capacity]. Biznesinform, no 8, pp. 225-231.
  10. Shafranov-Kutsev G. F., Tolstoguzov S. N. 2014. Proforientatsionnye praktiki vuza: monografiya [Vocational Guidance at the University: Monograph]. Moscow: Logos.
  11. Cornet A., Warland P. 2008. “GRH et gestion de la diversite”. DUMOND. Imprimerie CHIRAT, Avril 2008, p. 147.
  12. Gorshkov M. K. 2013. “The Role of Non-Economic Factors in the Use of Economic Growth Potential, Modernization and Consolidation of the Russian Society and Regions of the Russian Federation”. Tyumen State University Herald. Sociological, Economic, and Law Research, no 8.
  13. Institute for Competitiveness, India. http://competitiveness.in/IFC
  14. Jonas A. E. G. “Education and Changing the Culture of Competitiveness”. www.bristol.ac.uk
  15. Lengyel I. PTT Types of Competitiveness of Hungarian Microregions: Empirical Testing of the Regional Competitiveness Function. Hungary: University of Szeged. www.slideserve.com
  16. Martin R. L. “A Study on the Factors of Regional Competitiveness. A Draft Final Report for the European Commission Directorate — General Regional Policy”. University of Cambridge. ec.europa.eu competitivenes.pdf
  17. MENA — Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. www.oecd.org
  18. Olson M. 1965. “The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups”. Cambridge Mass: Harvard University Press. 
  19. Professor Ruth Wodak FAcSS. http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/profiles/265
  20. Schwab K. 2016. “Insight Report. The Global Competitiveness Report 2016-2017”. In: Sala-i-Martín X. (ed.). World Economic Forum. Columbia University.
  21. The World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org
  22. United Nation Development Programme. Human Development Reports. http://hdr.undp.org/en/data 
  23. Wodak R. “‘Competitiveness: A Dangerous Obsession’ — ‘Globalization and Competitiveness Rhetoric’ in EU Discourses”. ESRC Seminar Series 2007-2009. Changing Cultures of Competitiveness: Conceptual and Policy Issues. www.lancaster.ac.uk